Can I take the baby with the flash?

Pages: 1

15.04.2003 9:38:00
Is not harmful to the eyes of a newborn baby flash photography (variants: "head" in the ceiling)? And if harmful, then at what age can I use it?
 

15.04.2003 10:02:00

To view harmless. Can just scare - that it is harmful. If it has never been taken with the flash, it is better to "waste" flip it first in the corridor, then in a room in the corner at the ceiling. And since getting closer and closer - gradually, making sure that he does not notice it or perceive as a game. Then you can and shoot.

15.04.2003 10:12:00
Note. Infants better look at the photos in natural light . The first half of daylight, open the curtains, it is better not to direct sun, and a little in the back of the room. Away from carpets and other large colored surfaces. On the wall you can hang a white sheet, it aligns the lighting in the shadows.
Direct flash zagrubit features will not be described as soft transitions.

15.04.2003 17:24:00

I have in the manual for the camera down (Oly220) is in black and white prohibited (something like "Do not remove the pets and small children" ).

15.04.2003 17:35:00
I shoot with a tripod and only without the flash. With a sensitivity of 200 lens c hole 1, 8-2, 8 is enough.
I feel sorry for the baby, IMHO health is more expensive. . .

15.04.2003 18:36:00

forbidden precisely because not to scare. Well, young children can only cry, but pets are different - and can bite anything.
And of course, if it is possible, it is better to use a source of constant light, the flash is not "decorate" picture.

16.04.2003 10:41:00
One was a discussion in the conference. As far as I remember, the newborn is better not to shoot with the flash, and so almost up to 6 months. It has something to do with their eyes, not with fear.

16.04.2003 20:58:00
I am their babies (2) Never remove the flash, up to 3-4 years. Then through the ceiling began. Purely for reasons of health. How would say there is not - convinced the flash sight deteriorates. Remember, "bunnies" by welding or the sensations from the flash in the face, Multiply is the age difference and draw a conclusion. It's your kids! ! ! !

17.04.2003 0:18:00

H E L L H I!
may adversely affect the mind and vision.

And if harmful, then at what age can I use it?
Better with one and a half years, choosing times when the child is "ready" to act, and not "on the forehead."

This is not IMHO, but the opinion of a professional photographer shooting young children.

17.04.2003 0:51:00
Thank you all! I thought about.

17.04.2003 11:01:00

This is not IMHO, but the opinion of a professional photographer shooting young children.

What photographer? If it was a doctor. . .

And then, as I understand it, the real studies have been conducted and clearly considered that the outbreak worsens health is impossible. In fact, these studies take place in any case impossible, t. To. On child health affects a whole bunch of different factors, and to determine what affect the health of the flash, it is still impossible.

Naturally, I do not mean the flash directly into the eye before the flash when shooting once a month is hardly realistic worsen health. Especially because built-in flash is usually quite weak, and if there is an external, then it is still directed at the ceiling.

Even if the flash is somehow affected, its impact is much smaller than other factors such as unfavorable environment, radiation from a computer / TV / subway, substandard products, dirt, bacteria and so on. D. So flash duration 0. 01sek . once a month can be neglected

17.04.2003 17:06:00
quote:
:

This is not IMHO, but the opinion of a professional photographer shooting young children.

What photographer? If it was a doctor. . .

. . . . So flash duration 0. 01sek. once a month can be neglected

And the children that you have? Or convicted of a child as some kind devayse for his "technical specifications". Expert pancake.

17.04.2003 20:50:00
& Gt; Well, young children can only cry, but pets are different - and can bite anything.

Bullshit. Cats just do nothing but blink. . . Moreover, the bastards, faster shooting =) No reaction except super fast blinking not. Only if you put a red- Graz, causing flash 10 times before shooting breaks out - then turns away.

17.04.2003 21:42:00
There is such a device as Diffusers for flash (worn out), you can then do as well if the flash at the ceiling, then do not worry, kids do not really scared, anyway mine. Shot from the month.

17.04.2003 21:43:00
Does anyone know how to detect epilepsy neurologists? To this end, the study of elektroentsefalografom patient blaze flash (photic stimulation). However, it uses rhythmic flash (strobe) with a frequency of 0, 5-20 Hz.
Thus in patients with EEG curve appear sharp spike-wave, which is essentially an echo of conventional electric breakdown in brain structures.
Sometimes such stimulation leads to epileptic seizures in his chair doctor.

So, if even in adults is possible electrical breakdown in "chains", then what about the baby? And furthermore, such a powerful high-frequency pulse, as the camera flash.

course, research on the harmfulness of flash nobody ever spent. And that's just another reason not to "blaze"?
No sane doctors can not guarantee that the flash is harmless to infants.

Incidentally, doctors do not recommend doing photostimulation for kids.

18.04.2003 0:17:00

What photographer? If it was a doctor. . .

I wrote " professional photographer ." This characteristic of the man who matters beyond its jurisdiction decides to professionals in the relevant field (in this case the doctors) and that their recommendations.
the way, he had to shoot strangers children.

18.04.2003 10:49:00

And the children that you have?

There are already two years. Already clearly pronounces the word "stand" and is worn around the apartment with the change-8M
While I was shooting with a flash of his rare, because my old IXUS-a flash was weak, and all the background was obtained failed.

Expert pancake.

simply a matter of common sense, I am confident that with the current state of the environment, the level of industry, social factors, and life in general, the impact of the flash duration of 0, 01 seconds once a month, it can be neglected.

18.04.2003 11:22:00


However, it uses rhythmic flash (strobe) with a frequency of 0, 5-20 Hz.

That's exactly what is "fighting" part. Rhythmic flash. Because with this it is necessary to recall the same about the sensational case, when Japanese kids got epileptic seizures while watching the animated flick "Pokemon". And in this case, the current is often the alternation of brightly colored objects.
clear that the pulse power was a fraction of the flash output. For children (and not only), the flash is dangerous primarily because it can damage the retina of the eye - this is directly from the flash output (at full power, direct flash, the minimum distance). That is a direct flash contraindicated. Through the ceiling or umbrella - you can. But adults powerful flash in the eye hit is not recommended. Well, of course there was still the problem of the impact on the psyche of a child - it can scare elementary, it is.

The instructions also ban on shooting with the flash write for stupid Yankees.
There, in the instructions, sometimes prohibit animal hair dry in a microwave oven, for example. Some moron puffed flash at full power with half a meter, the child has received or damage to the eye or any breakdown. And citizen filed against the company. Mol what you freaks did not warn me that this can not be done, and I myself do not know how to think for a long time, I asshole for life. That's why such things appear in the instructions, to lose money in lousyutah because companies do not want to freak. And if the mind, without excessive zeal, then there is no harm. Just head to think.

p. s. This question is raised here is not the first time. Data that can shoot I got the doctor-otfalmologa, after accidentally flash puffed himself straight in the eye when securing devaysa the camera (well, who knew that the coffer vspyh turn ). Earned in the eyes of rabbits for two days. Well, come on consultation. There's me and told everything, so it's not IMHO.

18.04.2003 11:26:00
The instructions to the Nikon 4500 is written:

"Young children are not recommended to remove the flash from a distance of less than 1 meter."

This is not whether that with more than 1 m. You can shoot?

18.04.2003 13:29:00
I read it all. . . Little children of my 21 year old really filled. . . and the rest of the familiar kiddie not too little. . . although filmed about a month. . . and nothing [pah-pah-pah! ! ! ]
absolutely correct answers at the beginning:,,. Better picture without flash or flash at the ceiling / reflector / umbrella, and scare "in focus" better not. And so. . . Computers are also harmful to health. . . and even harmful to live - all are dying without exception (except Elijah).

18.04.2003 23:15:00

data that can take pictures I got from the doctor-otfalmologa after. . .

Such data can only specialist : (about one month) neonatologists later (one year) - mikropediator or doctors recommended them.


absolutely correct answers. . .

 

19.04.2003 18:33:00
It would be nice to develop the theme:
Is it possible to shoot with a flash of pregnant women . Fright still, . . . prezhedevremennye childbirth and so. d., and so on. n.. . . .
Perinatology - in the studio! ! !

20.04.2003 11:29:00
Photographing babies with flash - possible. Within reason, of course - blaze flash with HF 50 from a distance of 1 meter, I would poosteregsya. Frighten month old baby flash unreal - they it does not react, reflexes still not the same. But
! Despite all the writing, shooting babies do not need flash with artistic and aesthetic point of view, the result will be bad. Primarily due to the fact that the surface skin in children is very thin and the reflected light is colored capillaries, gaining significant redness. As a result, the picture turns creepy children complexion. Of course, this can be compensated for printing, but for this you need a normal minilab, not with riders (when recording on tape) or a good knowledge of Photoshop (when printing at home struynike). But why do you need the extra crap? Tripod and fast lens rule.
own son three years, all tested in practice, shooting with the first 15 minutes of his life to this day

21.04.2003 11:05:00

C for 15 minutes - it's great, but. . . flash is the same light as the sun or the conventional bulbs. Additionally show capillaries - there seems to need a source with strong red or even infrared component. Rather, here (in "gets terrible complexion") is another reason By myself I know: alien baby, age in months - terribly red, and covered with a rash. . . generally ugly, but your own. . . and the skin is beautiful, and the eyes are looking and where to focus and all this in a month already True pictured it really worse
So it's - psychology. And in real life all the kids in the first month (and more than a minute) and krasnovatenkie. . . In general, the photo - a fact of life.

and conventional approaches need to be guided in this case: a few scattered and draws power. Flash - so with an umbrella, the ceiling is also possible, but usually drops sharply contrast - as in cloudy weather turns better and draw light to add.

30.01.2014 23:01:00
I think that we should not shoot with the flash just born))) Though I am not a pro, but I think that with a hole 1. 4 (well, up to 2. 8) and iso 200-400 norms fotochki can do without flash, placing telepuza on good lighting natural light. . . A flash in the ceiling - it's the same natural light is obtained, just say the right and even at some point. . . So, I think that the baby must be a couple of days to get used to the outside world and only then safely into the ceiling, with a brightness of "-1" and "-3". . . A forehead and vzroslikam not advise)))

31.01.2014 23:26:00
quote:
Yuri Pavlov :
I think that we should not shoot with the flash just born))) Though I am not a pro, but I think that with a hole 1. 4 (well, up to 2. 8) and iso 200-400 can be done fotochki norms and without flash, placing telepuza on good lighting natural light. . . A flash in the ceiling - it's the same natural light is obtained, just say the right and even at some point. . . So, I think that the baby must be a couple of days to get used to the outside world and only then safely into the ceiling, with a brightness of "-1" and "-3". . . A forehead and vzroslikam not advise)))

Tom kid who asks about already 10 years

03.02.2014 7:29:00
Try yourself in the face popyhat ten times . The infant is simply not enough vocabulary to express an opinion about the photographer.

Excellent results will flash at the ceiling through the reflector.
If you plan to take your baby regularly buy extra flash with a trap - shadowless types of children's toys from the crib and looked good. No obektmv
aperture in the room did not help. Tips to buy expensive lens and shoot with a tripod on the open hole - sounding nonsense. Will not help

03.02.2014 13:26:00

No obektmv aperture in the room did not help.
categorically that as well! The men then do not know. . . .

04.02.2014 15:13:00
Here
right eye caught an example picture without flash in the room. Even the search is not necessary.

09.02.2014 15:47:00
quote:
:
Does anyone know how to detect epilepsy neurologists? To this end, the study of elektroentsefalografom patient blaze flash (photic stimulation). However, it uses rhythmic flash (strobe) with a frequency of 0, 5-20 Hz.
Thus in patients with EEG curve appear sharp spike-wave, which is essentially an echo of conventional electric breakdown in brain structures.
Sometimes such stimulation leads to epileptic seizures in his chair doctor.

So, if even in adults is possible electrical breakdown in "chains", then what about the baby? And furthermore, such a powerful high-frequency pulse, as the camera flash.
.

heard the sound so I do not know where he is. In adults and adolescents, yes, no small children. the more there is need to do a series.

Never mind the flash is not, but of course the external flash to beat right in the eye do not need. I fotkayu with foreign children in the ceiling, and built to a minimum in the forehead at the same time. No one is afraid and not blind. Front of the TV / computer much more harmful to hang for the eyes.

09.02.2014 16:33:00
Always use the flash only on reflection (in the ceiling, the wall, head back to the curtain, the floor, anywhere), depending on what you want to highlight. But overdo it in any case can not be easy to kill frame, children, too, can shoot flash enough its presence in the room, no need to peel it toward the child, try to send to the corner of the room, so there were several planes of reflection. . . , The options are many, better, of course, if there is daylight.

10.02.2014

children too can shoot flash enough its presence in the room
So write down, let it lie on the shelf

10.02.2014 2:04:00

So we write, let it lie on the shelf

No need to poke its nose in a child let blaze somewhere in the far corner of the room, and then the image will be normal tonal values ​​and no harm to the child. . . So clear?

10.02.2014 3:17:00
quote:
:

children too can shoot flash enough its presence in the room
So write down, let it lie on the shelf

booze when I rented, slave flash really is on the shelf. . .

10.02.2014 15:20:00

not need to poke her nose in a child let blaze somewhere in the far corner of the room, and then the image will be normal tonal values ​​and no harm to the child. . . So clear?

Thank you so explained in detail, now I understand, and then all head to break.

10.02.2014 15:30:00
2all

in British hospitals removed from the donuts in the face of babies on the day after delivery
in the sense they often have a staff photographer for the coin which can make the "first frame dityaki"
and so these staff photographer with the permission of the medical staff without challenges the conventional on-camera "donuts forward" at close range fotkayut malyavok


+
difference in the distance I can not see - from half a meter will give blaze 1 \\ 16 \\ two meters 1 4 - illumination will face the same


+
me himself was a wild idea pyhi face fine people but it turned out it's not so scary

10.02.2014 15:39:00

I myself was a wild idea pyhi face fine people
electroshock speak effectively. . .

10.02.2014 15:39:00

now I realized

11.02.2014 10:55:00

child no harm
And what harm? Kind of like with babies for centuries have seen the lightning, and the last couple of generations grew up with the flash.
While yes, there is a kind of stupor youth, probably with outbreaks in Chinese soap dish 90 is connected.
 

12.02.2014 17:48:00
took off his flash, rose, health all is well, only one minus as sfotografiruesh necessarily run to see what happens)
Pages: 1

Can I take the baby with the flash?

info@www.about-digital-photo.com