Discussion of the article: " Overview of the Fujinon XF 14mm F2. 8 R "

Pages: 1

29.05.2017 10:11:00
I suggest discussing the Fujinon XF 14mm F2 lens review. 8 R

The lens seems to be good, but the camera for some reason badly registers small and frequent details (needles, grass, leaves)
 

29.05.2017 11:18:00

29.05.2017 11:23:00

29.05.2017 11:37:00

Because in the review it is rightly written that the maximum detail of the glass is 5.6, but the photographer stubbornly used unnecessary ones in such focal focus f / 8
Of course, x-trance does not matter.

29.05.2017 12:03:00

unnecessary on such a f / 8

Be sure to write this to Fuji's engineers! And then, panimish, did already f / 22.

29.05.2017 12:23:00
Of course, x-trance does not matter.
at 24mp the x-trans problems only concern those who do not have it.


Be sure to write this to Fuji's engineers! And then, panimish, did already f / 22.
" Savages-with "


29.05.2017 13:05:00
quote:
:

why the bad records and frequent small details
Something tells us that the reason lies in the type label " Fuji " on the body.

because the converter is the most soapy one took. . . .

29.05.2017 13:48:00
After 12mm on a full frame Fujinon XF 14mm F2. 8 R with a 21mm real and with a minimum diaphragm 4, 2 seems an entirely ordinary lens, why delight? Could and try a little.

29.05.2017 14:15:00
citation:
:
After 12mm on the full frame of the Fujinon XF 14mm F2. 8 R with a 21mm real and with a minimum diaphragm 4, 2 seems an entirely ordinary lens, why delight? Could and try a little.
not everyone needs an ultra-wide angle, for shooting architecture and interior even more likely harmful. EGF 21 mm - the classic optimal wide angle. Diaphragm 2. 8 and the sensor format does not depend, only the equivalent GRIP changes, which is not very relevant for the width, the aperture is enough for shooting of stellar landscapes, for example. In general, a good quality lens.
Although I end up with Samyang 12/2. 0 took on the Fuji, and noticeably cheaper and more powerful.

29.05.2017 14:18:00

and more powerful

So " For the width is not very relevant " .

not everyone needs an ultra-wide angle, for shooting architecture and interior even more likely harmful.

" In appearance, it is good, yes green, berries are not mature. . . & Quot;

29.05.2017 14:23:00

you carefully read what I wrote?
is not relevant for a smaller FLU, and the light-intensity is quite. These are somewhat different concepts.

29.05.2017 14:27:00
That's only the price of 60t. R. Should not have a simple, albeit a quality lens.

29.05.2017 14:52:00
Sections " Colors " And " Halftone " In tests of the lens - unnecessary: it's not the camera that is being tested.

It's clear that the full resolution is not too much needed, 16 mp for this optics and the sensor would be quite enough, and even 10 mp. On the other hand - why not. . .
 

29.05.2017 14:52:00

Fudge Price Laurels Leakey has been haunted for many years And now Fudge proclaimed himself Messiah " A new Lake " And began to rivet the glasses for their PPCs at insane prices with the massive support of washing marketing, which is evidenced, at least, by the current design of the top of the page of this photo forum.

29.05.2017 14:53:00

not everyone needs an ultra-wide angle, for shooting architecture and interior even more likely harmful
Good luck with 21 mm and interiors. In post-Soviet realities and 16 mm, EGF is sometimes narrow, for every little thing.
Aperture for such tasks is not needed, especially if there is a stub, like the same penny kenon 10-18.
Over 1000 bucks. For fix-shirik 2. 8 per crap - comments are superfluous.

29.05.2017 14:56:00
citation:
:
Here is the price of 60t. R. Should not have a simple, albeit a quality lens.
Well, for a quality lens in general, now the standard price) somehow now all the prices are not encouraging. . .
although now it is more reasonable to take 10-24 for this money, although it is a bit darker. But the 14mm idea is different, under a different style of shooting. He was just back in the days of the first Fuji cameras came out, when they seem to have an idea exclusively in the form factor of the rangefinders with the fixations to be. Good time to orientate, so that people with DSLRs do not drag))

quote:
:

not everyone needs an ultra-wide angle for shooting architecture and interiors even more harmful
fun with 21 mm and interiors. In post-Soviet realities and 16 mm, EGF is sometimes narrow, for every little thing.
Aperture for such tasks is not needed, especially if there is a stub, like the same penny kenon 10-18.
Over 1000 bucks. For fix-shirik 2. 8 per crap - comments are superfluous.
Well, I'm taking pictures. . . for money. . . Basically on 12-16 mm (on a crop). What am I doing wrong? ))
It should be understood that the superwaves are very distorting the perspective and the ratio of the elements of the interior or exterior. The whole idea of ​​the designer / architect is being sung. A pair of frames can be removed for effekt for spectacularity, or a panorama to collect. But many designers recently asked not to do much at once " Stretched into the corners " Frames.
In a penny canon and a penny and constructive picture in the same place, I left the canon for fuji, I knew him, tried it, did not like it.
Still, quality, with a good design, high-speed wide-angle fix will obviously not be cheap.

quote:
:

Fuji price Laura Lakey haunt for many years And Fudge declared himself & quot messiah; A new Lake " And began to rivet the glasses for their PPCs at insane prices with the massive support of washing marketing, which is evidenced, at least, by the current design of the top of the page of this photo forum.

30-60 thousand straight horror what insane money? Well then now all the prices for optics are insane))
That's a really crazy Sony)

29.05.2017 15:29:00

It should be understood that the superwaves are very distorting the perspective and the ratio of the elements of the interior or exterior. The whole idea of ​​the designer / architect is being sung.
The design is so " One-piece " , That all together is strewed and falls apart, but separately the details are beautiful? Oh, I'm familiar with this, just like a designer.

But many designers have recently asked not to do much at once " Stretched into the corners " Frames
What do they ask you to do when you need to shoot a bathroom in 5-10 m2?

have kopeck Canon and a cheap picture
Typical Shirikov, some sharper, distortion (no perspective distortion) very norms.
But here you have the obvious " Yoda-yatakvizhu "

Construct there as well
Does it break if they are clogged with nails? It's a pity.

29.05.2017 15:55:00

Of course, x-trance does not matter. What did not it please?

29.05.2017 16:15:00
quote:
:

must understand that sverhshiriki very distorted perspective and relationship elements of the interior or exterior. The whole idea of ​​the designer / architect is being sung.
The design is so " One-piece " , That all together is strewed and falls apart, but separately the details are beautiful? Oh, I'm familiar with this, just like a designer.
something you did not carefully read (well, or not filmed this). . . Falls apart when in the corners and on the PP everything is drawn and huge, and half of the interior goes to infinity and to trifle. . .
Well, as if the designers who asked, elite interiors are engaged and with a lot of experience and portfolio. Not about the budget sphere, it's mostly speech. In fact, I myself have been working in the company for 20 years, which is engaged in interiors, including designer and designer)).

But many designers recently asked not to do much at once " Stretched into the corners " Frames
And what they ask you to do when you need to shoot a bathroom in 5-10 m2?

I'll take the panorama off if it's cramped, and there I can better manage the perspective and distortions. If it's not critical just simulate the superwave, well, or fisheye. By the way, I'm also shooting them, sometimes just when I need to show more even at the expense of geometry.

have kopeck Canon and a cheap picture
Typical Shirikov, some sharper, distortion (no perspective distortion) very norms.
But here you have the obvious " Yoda-yatakvizhu "

you shoot with bright sources to understand the difference. Especially when they are in the frame across the field and directly into the lens shine. Well, somehow there is a difference in the picture with good optics. If you do not see, does not mean that others do not) need to develop visual perception, not sarcastic)

constructive to the same
break if they hammer nails? It's a pity.

Plastic during active use wears out very quickly, plus shaking in the car, or sometimes it's enough to go to the metro during the rush hour.
Sometimes it is shooting on the street and on construction sites, well, landscape photography is in difficult conditions, a strong construct is not superfluous.


However, the flood started somehow. . .

30.05.2017 0:57:00
A sad lens. Samyang 14/2. 8, remember in his torn scraps

citation:
:

course x-trans and. What did not it hit?

traditionally poor leaf detail and hard to remove diagonal moiré. And so the sensor is good

30.05.2017 14:00:00
citation:


citation:
:

course x-trans and. What did not it please?
Traditionally poorly detailed foliage and hard to remove diagonal moiré. And so the sensor is good. Bad specification, if the converter does not know how to properly x-trans demosize, lazy and slow-moving Adobe, for example. There are converters that do this well. Another question is that the fuji themselves as " Native " Unsuccessful SilkyPix chose, which is even worse than adob's detailing.

I've compared different converters: http: // feanorus454. Livejournal. Com / 85600. Html

30.05.2017 16:52:00
Zeiss is the same 12/2. 8 for comparable money for Fujik.
It will not be any worse.

30.05.2017 17:31:00

poor detail if the converter does not know how to do it properly x-trans demozit, lazy and slow Adobe, for example
Well, Capture One can show up with the latest versions with both T20 and T2

30.05.2017 19:23:00

poor detail if the converter does not know how to properly x-trans demodulate
Well, this can be remedied by the choice of converter. Began to forget the Fuji. . . .
 

31.05.2017 12:00:00
quote:
:

bad detail, if the converter is not able to properly x-trans Showroom, lazy and clumsy as Adobe, for example
Well, Capture One can be with the latest versions with T20 and T2
I This is hinting) although I use Iridient Developer myself, I liked it somehow)

FEB5B8444C6B4CC8AE56B29C8EB 055BB:

bad detail, if the converter is not able to properly x-trans Showroom
well, it's fixable converter option. Began to forget the Fuji. . . .
I'm talking about the same)
Pages: 1

Discussion of the article: " Overview of the Fujinon XF 14mm F2. 8 R "

info@www.about-digital-photo.com