Discussion of the article: " Review and test the professional SLR camera Nikon D5 "

Pages: 1 2

16.09.2016 10:14:00
I propose to discuss the review and test the professional SLR camera Nikon D5

In the gallery we have to spend one more test - to see how the noise borne by the picture of a human face. As we have already encountered situations where artificial surface squelch handles perfectly, and the human face shamelessly Photoshop & quot; - I did not understand, tests that, in the Cam. dzhpeg? ?
 

16.09.2016 10:41:00
But this same test chamber actual operation , rather than artificial problems. Yet it is a powerful tool masthead reportazhnika rather than measuring tool

16.09.2016 11:06:00

I think these cameras should testit reportazhnik professional and not as a man, and not anyhow.

16.09.2016 11:09:00
A professional - who is this? Anyone who has learned to rewrite a passport, or years earning reportazhkoy most top-end cameras of its time? Who & quot; anyhow who & quot ;?

16.09.2016 11:26:00

What rhetorical questions? Of course the one who takes such cameras, professional. And if someone, it's like the authors of reviews and local resources, and your link.

16.09.2016 11:31:00
Then the question is not even a rhetorical and empty - the author does not know what kinds of reportazhki much, but as a writer - only a passport can rewrite, considering this test. All, no one to talk to.

16.09.2016 13:22:00
Show the results of these cameras is necessary with medium format.
That second reportazhki not clear, and that these - ideal reportazhki - too.
But show them in a way that the top of all, I think, not worth it.

16.09.2016 13:24:00

Show results of these cameras is necessary with medium format.
That second reportazhki not clear, and that these - ideal reportazhki - too.
But show them in a way that the top of all, I think, not worth it.


to battle with sredneformatkami have D810 (well, all there 5DS (R) Yes a7R II) .

16.09.2016 14:20:00
I do not know exactly why, but I always prefer pictures taken by Nikon. Once there either softer colors (especially physical), I do not know, but my eye-pleasing pictures with Nikon. However, the last time I compared the 5th mark with 700 Nikon.
compare without picking long shots in Photoshop. And immediately obtained from the camera.

16.09.2016 14:22:00

Corporal general it is better to canon, the more immediately from the camera.


sredneformatki And here, I do xs.


16.09.2016 22:03:00

I do not know exactly why, but I always prefer pictures taken by Nikon.


is called vkusovschina. I also like mandrel 610 with more than Mrak2.

17.09.2016 12:16:00
Nikon is always better shot. But Canon has always been more convenient. It is the collective opinion.
way or another, and in 1980 was decisive for Nikon: Nikon shoot - better. A pontovatsya - canon.

And by the way, no one has never occurred to compare Hasselblad to Canon. No one in his right mind.


17.09.2016 12:27:00

Nikon always better shot. But Canon has always been more convenient. It is the collective opinion.
you team?

17.09.2016 14:08:00


But Canon has always been a convenient

preferred in what?

P. S. In the right hands, and x. . . balalaika

17.09.2016 19:50:00
quote:
:

Corporal general it is better to canon, the more immediately from the camera.

With all due respect) I was terribly far from professionalism. Amateur. Maybe a little bit advanced. Simply choosing a good camera down, compared to the different test sites are absolutely identical pictures of the different camera down.

Watching 2 identical pictures. In one something irritates the eyes, the other - like everything. Oh, and it increased, and gazed at. I can not understand, what is it? But Canon's something wrong.
And especially it cast my eyes on the portraits of people.

But I myself was a simple canon, because I originally set was mark5. But
. . . eventually chose nikon.

And more. Many photographs taken Canon (completely different) and laid out without treatment, I noticed a very noticeable hrommaticheskie aberration. Particularly noticeable on the branches of trees. In Nikonov - ever.

17.09.2016 19:53:00

XA depend only on the lens, and has almost all high-aperture lenses. . . And you confuse nikon and canon, skin tone better with the canon, it is a recognized fact, all except the rabid nikonistov.

17.09.2016 20:14:00
quote:
:

XA depend only on the lens, and has almost all high-aperture lenses. . . And you confuse nikon and canon, skin tone better with the canon, it is a recognized fact, all except the rabid nikonistov.

I was kenonistom))) & quot; This is because at the time I did not have Nikon & quot; (C) the postman Pechkin

I watched runoff lenses - I'm not a professional.

I think professionals with their experience and skill can create at any fote miracle.

Right now you will laugh but. . . potyrkal I mark5 and Nikon 700. . and chose the Nikon 7000 - I realized that the 700th exceeds my needs. Yes, and my photographic ability. + Sorry will drop / lose / steal traveling. . .

Things - work of professionals. Although someone and Hasselblad little. )

you professionals probably are important differences between the camera down a level in the article. And to me, lover. . . both seem fantastic. And free to take any. And for the money - nikon. Well I'm a fan of Cho to take me? )

17.09.2016 20:29:00
To begin with, the raw shots no one compares. This is silly.

17.09.2016 20:37:00

I watched runoff lenses
On whales ha little as a rule, or have been defective, evaluate whale system is strong. .

17.09.2016 20:44:00

So I'm not a professional - my house. . . )

17.09.2016 20:53:00

Porsche horseradish with tires from the Zhiguli, but I'm home
Home Pontus by little whale SLR and shooting in dzhpeg.

17.09.2016 20:55:00
skintone from Canon - the problem
skintone from Nikon - the same problem, only & quot; in the other direction & quot; - Went too far.

was even a video on youtube paired skintones 5dm3 and some Nikon (d600 can not remember exactly). nikon there was a little more preferable color rendering skin tone.

not dealt with Canon, Nikon, but with skintone I do not like. Artist profile Nikon. but the color reproduction, including skintone - no.

so that the rule had to color reproduction. Now, Nikon provides a perfectly acceptable color. including skintone. You can even twist the rules. gemorno but it is expensive and perhaps not necessary - with a color rendering explicit probemy removed, and small inaccuracies - in the real image is not visible.

17.09.2016 20:58:00
quote:
:

Home Pontus by little whale SLR and shooting in dzhpeg.
I needed a camera that takes acceptable in low light conditions. NEzerkalki in this regard at all. But since 7000 - quite worthy)

Below - 5000 and 3000 also did not like. A 700 was only one / half step better. I would take. . . but the fate of the camera travel is unpredictable. Especially in terms of theft. Naturally, it would be richer - Hasselblad would take, or what else is there to take the yacht Abramovich)))


And after that was 7000 for me - just fantastic.


17.09.2016 21:22:00

was even a video on youtube paired skintones 5dm3 and some Nikon
comparison was with the d750, and yes it was a good skintone comparable. In greenhouse conditions. And I have to hand d610, I know whereof I speak. With 5dm3 better.

18.09.2016 9:34:00

But I myself was a simple canon, because I originally set was mark5.

And do not care that this has not yet been released .


And my hand d610

A uncle in Kiev theme of D5.


18.09.2016 11:10:00
Thank
cap
 

18.09.2016 11:16:00

such cameras should testit professional reportazhnik
A professional reportazhnika always established professional addiction.



Nikon always better shot. But Canon has always been more convenient. It is the collective opinion.
Yeah, that something at all events 95% pro shoot canon))

18.09.2016 11:18:00

Thanks cap

Treat, if that!



is something at all events 95% pro shoot canon))

In what year?

18.09.2016 11:36:00

A professional reportazhnika always established professional addiction
But he & quot; in the subject line & quot ;.

18.09.2016 12:08:00
quote:
:
Nikon always better shot. But Canon has always been more convenient. It is the collective opinion.
Yeah, to-to at all events 95% pro shoot canon))

"Anyone who seriously claims about the superiority of one-to-one brand over another - either a fool or financially interested in the promotion of a particular brand. Participation in the debate «Nikon vs. Canon »- destiny-technophile beginners, for whom photography - fashionable hobby, not a way of artistic expression. & Quot;

18.09.2016 13:00:00
Nikon taxis

18.09.2016 13:09:00
quote:
:
Nikon taxis
and where he steers?

18.09.2016 13:20:00
quote:
:
quote:
:
Nikon taxis
and where he steers?

Well, he was not alone, he, along with Sony.
https: // www. dxomark. com / cameras # hideAdvancedOptions = ... yDataType = rankDxo

18.09.2016 13:33:00
You checkers or go?
©

Both cameras are just marvelous, and each of them can be in the presence of direct hands to make smart shots.

Then these cameras do not buy as the very first (here all the same thing is the three-digit Canon / four-Nikon), or even the second or third (here already can be & quot; budget & quot; full frame, if the user has an extra 2- 3 pieces bucks).
When it comes time to buy a professional camera, the user has long been an adherent of a & quot; religion & quot; (Be it Canon, Nikon or even any UPC) and move it is unlikely to be on a different system, so that will have to change all the windows.

18.09.2016 18:46:00

You rightly said. Professionals need to except that the comparison with the previous version of the camera in the same class. To know it time already to sell the old KONYAKI and change to a new, or quietly remove farther))
Although the pros meet transitions from system to system, especially a lot of migrations began when Nikon released the first FF SLRs after years of excuses, saying that and FF without good)) But the popularity kenonovskih dimes also fell because the people en masse began to shoot video on DSLRs. Though here and Nikon video is now very, very much, so that the reasons for migration already do not see who is on what used to - on that will sit a matter of taste.

18.09.2016 19:13:00
Serg Kam
Well, he was not alone, he, along with Sony.
professional & quot; dhomarka & quot;

18.09.2016 21:53:00
quote:
:
Serg Kam
Well, he was not alone, he, along with Sony.
professional & quot; dhomarka & quot;

Giggles like a redneck, who said that in fact the Earth revolves around the sun.
seems like irrefutable fact, and it seems like they do not believe it.

18.09.2016 21:57:00
Serg Kam
redneck believe in drawing on the fence, normal people take off

19.09.2016 11:36:00
Charts on the fence? nothing more intelligent to come up with failed?
Leave establish the truth engineers and scientists, who did for you this complex technique, since you yourself live on concepts and & quot; & quot ;. seemingness

p. s. and you are offended, because you did not have any objective argument? do not worry, simply remove the photo, to each his own.

19.09.2016 12:08:00
Serg Kam

visionary you

19.09.2016 12:33:00
Was overs one pepper, claimed that Canon remove only color-blind. Yet Nikon lovers - special people.

19.09.2016 14:23:00
Unfortunately, this is not the best camera is the Nikon, t. To. The traditional space DD Nikon / Sony here present (compare possible to dpreview), and in this case, the canon was slightly ahead even in this parameter, which is not typical in general for him.

In any case, I do not know the people who are moving to the top devices when changing generation to another system (have to buy a ton of new optics, and is mad costs), if such there is, their unity on this this argument & quot; it is better & quot; usually applies only to fans who drool at the top technique, the real users will remain on their usual system, the novice photographer does not buy such equipment in general.
But for beginners & quot; middle segment FF & quot; especially no choice - if the mirror - the Nikon 810 or 750, if the system unit - Sony A7RII. Canon openly surrendered all positions in the middle segment, and poor 5D Mark 4, in which even an HDMI output cut to FullHD (what finally destroyed its use as Prof. camcorders, t. To. 2. 0 CFast slot he did not get, and then even hacking the firmware will not help him) proof.

19.09.2016 14:35:00
*

19.09.2016 16:36:00
quote:
:
Unfortunately, this is not the best camera is the Nikon, ie to the traditional space DD Nikon / Sony here present (compare possible to dpreview), and in this case, the canon was a bit ahead of even this parameter.. which is not generally typical for it.
Perhaps. Nikon could not do that matrix, which could be expected from him.

quote:
:
But for beginners & quot; middle segment FF & quot; especially no choice - if the mirror - the Nikon 810 or 750, if the system unit - Sony A7RII. Canon openly surrendered all positions in the middle segment, and poor 5D Mark 4, in which even an HDMI output cut to FullHD (what finally destroyed its use as Prof. camcorders, t. To. 2. 0 CFast slot he did not get, and then even hacking the firmware will not help him) proof.

Yes, Sony looks very promising. Actually, the best sensors - all of them in t h and Nikon...

quote:
:
Serg Kam

visionary you
No fancy, just the facts. Indoor, you have nothing.

19.09.2016 17:25:00
Serg Kam
Well, what can cover an alternate universe, telepathy and the crystal ball? Against such a combination I'm powerless

19.09.2016 18:13:00
quote:
:
Serg Kam
Well, what can cover an alternate universe, telepathy and the crystal ball? Against such a combination I'm powerless
Oh, yes you are a drug addict campaign. Well, then no questions.

19.09.2016 18:37:00
Serg Kam
Of course, you already know on the squiggle good camera or not, and I'm an addict
I've been looking at the pictures in different conditions. According tsiferki bought a camera a couple of times already taught. .

19.09.2016 21:03:00

poor 5D Mark 4, in which even an HDMI output cut to FullHD (what finally destroyed its use as Prof. camcorder

Yet Nikon lovers - special people .

19.09.2016 21:56:00
quote:
:

poor 5D Mark 4, in which even an HDMI output cut to FullHD (what finally destroyed its use as Prof. camcorder

Yet Nikon lovers - special people
A. what makes you think that he is a fan of the Nikon? Or do you think, if you criticize a company that just can not be it user? Primitivnenko..
 

19.09.2016 22:11:00
Serg Kam
Primitive judged by Tsiferki DRL camera
Pages: 1 2

Discussion of the article: " Review and test the professional SLR camera Nikon D5 "

info@www.about-digital-photo.com