D500 return zhidaya

Pages: 1 2 3

06.01.2016 15:12:00
http: // www. dpreview. com / news / 8529664044 / here-at-last ... on-announces-d500
not clear why there were three figures to revive. It is currently at 7300 pulls the difference with 7200 is less than that D5 to D4
 

06.01.2016 17:52:00
Housing, defense, focusing system like D5!
Burst 10 k / s, 4K video
cost 2000 dollars
Not?

06.01.2016 22:49:00

cost 2000 dollars

Well, cost is not the main difference. But the body and focusing system - is essential (for me).

. . . More
pyhi built there.


07.01.2016 8:55:00

Yeah, eternal Jed

surprising that called for intuziasty suddenly. . . zamarketilis completely. . .

07.01.2016 9:56:00
Luggage fire. AF module from the five adult at all atomic.

seems, for my entertainment in the forest has a new toy.

time to start saving money.



intuziasty
enthusiasts

Damn, you're much time you spend in the bath I could have learned Russian

07.01.2016 10:12:00

Luggage fire. AF module from the five adult at all atomic.
from 7200 was cooler - unit steeper than the adult Quartet. It turns out that 500 - the degradation of 7xxx series
Damn, you're much time you spend in the bath I could have learned Russian
is to make it achem pagavarit


for my entertainment in the forest has a new toy.
are you more careful, do not hurt

forest - it is - dark


07.01.2016 10:33:00

late. I have something there (Artful word) ankle. Just because of the shooting. Injury two years, has recently manifested itself. The doctor has forbidden to walk on in the kitchen and the plaster I wanted to roll.


But I all the same flowers, fences and the target will not take pictures!

07.01.2016 10:33:00
+ Google on the internet, found the frequency with which 4K. If there is at least 30 - it is the first device of crop 1, 5 by the manufacturer with the normal video (before there were only samsungi yes Panasonic, Sony have cockroaches).
- Price for more than three kilobaksov (the lens) in the current crisis - is very expensive.

07.01.2016 10:39:00

the crop is the first device 1, 5 from the normal manufacturer with video
cleverly twisted a little. Is kenona have not been good at 4k sprinkles? (I do not mean the camera


But I all the same flowers, fences and the target will not take pictures!
only then will a true Jew


07.01.2016 10:55:00

kenona Did not have a good sprinkled on 4k?
C100? - It is something special. And now many are willing to have two in one - a good camera that can shoot video in addition 4K. I allocate special, because in reality, due to a number of restrictions cameras can only demonstrate the capabilities of movies.

07.01.2016 11:05:00

this particular thing.
is another matter.
and then another thing that a7s can for the money you can take, and it's not even the crop, but the video gives a good, really. . .

07.01.2016 11:26:00

a7s can for the money you can take
A7SII really a competitor (older versions only external recorder wrote). But the problem is common - for video lenses, there is only Photoobjectives. Poverzumy only Neksa and nikonvana.

07.01.2016 11:30:00

old versions only external recorder wrote
for the pros - the fact still intrachamber only 4: 2: 0 provides

But the trouble total - no lenses for video
pros in the manual is removed mostly. . .


Poverzumy only Neksa and nikonvana.
while the Nikon DSLRs for good with poverzumami?


07.01.2016 11:36:00

intrachamber only 4: 2: 0 provides
And you the difference, in the video, the eyes differ?
pros in the manual is removed mostly. . .
Normal pros shoot camera, not cameras. Fotikom videos rented or lovers, or a pro-rogue. In the latter case, the camera is still cluttered with a bunch accommodate rig, size becomes a refrigerator, and the price - with a car.
regards "zhidaya" - cropped too expensive, even if he is a super-duper. And here is the most common crop, apart from the first Nikon 4K.

07.01.2016 11:40:00

regards "zhidaya" - cropped too expensive, even if he is a super-duper.
that's how they opened with a canon, and more and there was nobody. . .

And here is the most common crop, apart from the first Nikon 4K.
is not yet known what (matrix and all the rest - new). first 4k - only for Nikon overdue. . .


And you the difference, in the video, the eyes differ?
I was not looking, but if you catch a flea, so catching. Sonia even-pixel reading is. . .

in D5 is also 4k


07.01.2016 11:55:00

from 7200 was cooler - unit steeper than the adult Quartet.
it does not abruptly, he was just a slightly updated t. To. The camera came much later, but all the same M3500, and the same modules work differently on sprinkled module called 3500DX, on FF it was 3500FX and they do not work at the same
D5 \\ 500 actually steeper TTX, that there really is a new module in the 7200 module old

07.01.2016 11:58:00

he was just slightly updated t. To. The camera came much later
stop sensitivity - this is not a little

at D5 \\ 500 actually steeper TTX, that there really is a new module in the 7200 module old

I about the situation of 7200 at the time of release, it was steeper, and the module is the coolest, and here just the same as the older

07.01.2016 12:04:00

top sensitivity - this is not a little
well, wait, before Prof. modules to \\ n just different this stop, Nikon was always sensitive, but on the whole unit was steeper than he had something better ( dark WMS), but the rate of lost

I'm talking about the situation of 7200 at the time of release, it was steeper, and the module is the coolest, and here just the same as the older
completely different situation because in the D7200 came much later than D4, D5 and D500 and go at the same time, thank God that the D500 has not yet cut, it could not be better t. To. They have no better at the moment

07.01.2016 12:10:00

well, wait, before Prof. modules to \\ n just different this stop, Nikon was always sensitive, but on the whole unit was steeper than he had something better (in the darkness we can), but lost speed
tsuvstvitelnee - is better (the rest - was the same)

completely different situation because in the D7200 came out much later than the D4
and I say, at 7200 steeper situation

thank God that the D500 has not yet cut, it could not be better t. To. They have no better at the moment
yes, OK, a simple repetition of history with d3-300. it turns out that line xxx poslabzhe than 7xxx, it is not clear what was the name of the once-famed series resurrect - only confuse neophytes. . .

07.01.2016 12:16:00

that line xxx poslabzhe than 7xxx,
remember which AF was at D7000, it was misery, and then only in the D7100 set like a stamp, but not better, and D7200 were just lucky with the fact that it came sooner than D5, but since then he AF much worse than the D500 \\ D5, in fact, he left the old module, the current drank, and new cameras make real a new module

07.01.2016 17:07:00

So I say, at the 7xxx series went on the rise, and then regress, and a series of what-is changed. And how much better the new module is no one knows. . .

07.01.2016 20:10:00

7xxx series have gone on increasing
a regression model, if both came at the same time? could not D500 receive module better t. To. it had never been,
when the D300 received exactly the same unit as the D3, in this regard, nothing has changed, D7200 byudzhetka module and her worse than the D500, a fact

A how much better the new module is no one knows. . .
well compared to how much there M3500 "improved" there is clearly a LOT

08.01.2016 8:21:00

And that 750 of the budget other than the most advanced ah? The fact that the unit had 500 better than that 7200 will be when they are compared. While the fact is that it is not the only camera with the top unit in the system, as opposed to the d7200 (on (release

08.01.2016 10:34:00
English I do not know if there's something better in terms of ease of recording on external disks, such as online?
And I suppose that d750-810 also upgrade to the new auto-focus, and 750 more will be removed and the filter.
the centenary of the company.
 

08.01.2016 11:14:00

750 to update without refreshing the matrix is ​​not much point. After a year with the new 760 will die and the module AF, even in a year would be 7300 with an improved AF. 810 - even the song another story. It will be 820 new 42mp sensor and this af

After the 7300 500 will be the only advantage malopikselnost


08.01.2016 11:18:00

unlike d7200 (on (release
on D7200 M3500DX, this unit was already in many cells + \\ - small differences in sensitivity, appearance D500 \\ D5 is as the appearance of D300 \\ D3, and then to a thread of 7300 or even 7400 will receive from them this module

And that 750 of the budget other than the most advanced ah?
budget so he, he did not put something more on the D600 \\ 610, and that was not, AF was there like D7000, but at the time the module 3500 has long been invented


After the 7300 500 will be the only advantage malopikselnost
only the price would be almost the same, top Nikon in this line is not cheap


08.01.2016 11:29:00

again. Stop in photofission is not minor differences. To understand this, you can, for example, look at the difference in lens aperture stop (well, type 70-200 / 4 and 70-200 / 2).

According to the disclosure of understanding of budgetary drain also counted.

d7300 price will be lower, and the module can also be better and it can completely shut down a strange zhidayskoe razvodilovo 500

I would prefer to have a new matrix and AF in the carcass of 7200 (it is clear that the price would be logical 1500).

And the funny thing is, all this will be in 7300, when 500 in Peru to everyone (half-year). D500 will have the same price in 1500, because it is 10 k / s, and 7300- 7-8


08.01.2016 12:15:00

can, for example, look at the difference in lens aperture stop (well, type 70-200 / 4 and 70-200 / 2)
In this example, the difference in luminosity of not one, but two stops.

08.01.2016 12:24:00

Well, you understand, I hope

08.01.2016 12:43:00
Discussion is good, but in the end this thing not to talk, and for the acquisition of real someone interested?

08.01.2016 12:45:00
Kupyut necessarily

08.01.2016 12:50:00

again. Stop in photofission is not minor differences. To understand this, you can, for example, look at the difference in lens aperture stop (well, type 70-200 / 4 and 70-200 / 2).
and then stop in the aperture ratio and sensitivity of AF in the dark? are different concepts

price d7300 will be lower, and the module can also be better and it can completely shut down a strange zhidayskoe razvodilovo 500
and maybe even worse as it was with the D7000 which frankly merged by AF counterparts from Canon not to mention the older D300

I would prefer to have a new matrix and AF in the carcass of 7200 (it is clear that the price would be logical 1500).
I would have, but it will have to wait at 7300 as a thread of 7500 while the owners of the D500 has to be removed to a new AF

have D500 will make the price of the same in 1500, because it is 10 k / s, and 7300 - 7-8
the result D500 is even more preferably, t. To. byudzhetke in some functions likely porezhut

08.01.2016 12:56:00

aperture stop it and stop in Africa - I showed him the importance for photographers who can so quickly will reach

All will be in 7300 and it would thus be preferable, 7200 strongly backs.


10.01.2016 7:47:00
And quickly sd card somehow ashamed to put even half

popularity D300 he did not get there d7200 d750 and much cheaper. . .


13.01.2016 10:15:00
Lord!
Something t do not see, and he nasensornye phase AF sensors have? AF LiveView like - smart, or as usual?

13.01.2016 10:41:00

AF LiveView like - smart, or as usual?

even more interesting about servo AF in video.

13.01.2016 11:14:00
Even half
popularity D300 he did not get there d7200 d750 and much cheaper. . .

Well, it is certainly true, t. To. At the time of D300 was not a relative of the budget FF or available Kropa heaped with AF, and for many that the camera was no alternative. But some popular new devaysina get, and is unlikely to be a failure in the market. 7Dm2 sold well, and obviously looking at its sales, Nikon has decided to continue the same line of professional reportage Kropa.

13.01.2016 12:02:00

between failure and popular model has a decent difference. Two rival is also quite cheap for Prof. reportage. . .

http: // www. dpreview. com / articles / 9189851572 / hands-on-with-nikon-d5
A sleepy-type maps are done fast. . . No, to quickly put the cd, which have long been higher than 200 MBS yield on record. . .


16.01.2016 10:32:00
Auto AF Fine tune - has come true at last! And the campaign is the JVI best cropped in the universe (1 0x), even better than the D300s. Covering AF too impressed.
PS correct a mistake in the name of the topic.

16.01.2016 15:19:00
quote:
:
Auto AF Fine tune - has come true at last! And the campaign is the JVI best cropped in the universe (1 0x), even better than the D300s. Covering AF too impressed.
Still matrix 6 megapixels, and would be ideal .

16.01.2016 15:25:00

and the housing 7200

16.01.2016 16:42:00

and the housing 7200

Pro body in the petition, like, nothing.

17.01.2016 3:06:00

Nadra immediately add such a good turn out petition ...

23.01.2016 12:22:00
In technical terms, SLR beast! Who is the manufacturer of the matrix? Sony?

Any questions on the touch screen:
1- in SLR has the ability to turn off the touch control and use the display in normal mode, the Button?
2- to protect the display can be put protective glass or only a protective film? If you put the glass, will be able to control the touch screen?

23.01.2016 12:24:00

Who is the manufacturer of the matrix? Sony?
likely

Any questions on the touch screen:
camera is no one

23.01.2016 12:37:00
In theory, the ability to disable the sensor simply has to be.

Reportazhnikam from this feature only harm. A camera, kind of like for them sharpened.
 

23.01.2016 12:59:00

In theory, the ability to disable the sensor simply has to be.
there just has auto-shutdown for presentation to the eye
Pages: 1 2 3

D500 return zhidaya

info@www.about-digital-photo.com