Maximum quality in the minimal form factor. What to buy? UPC (whale) or premium compact? We determine the selection of quality universal camera. (part 2)


06.10.2015 17:36:00
(This is a continuation of the previous topics)
 

06.10.2015 17:46:00

ryksu measure up. Nameryanno type around like blinozuma. But the edge of a soap what to do?
. So
identity m2.

06.10.2015 18:00:00
What no one here No A5100 / A6000 and 35F1. 8?
When ~ F7 zabubenit peyzazhig in sunny weather. . .
. . . Micro will not find it, and pozaproshlogodnie Samsung will probably catch up on detail.

06.10.2015 18:03:00

When ~ F7 zabubenit peyzazhig in sunny weather. . .
. . . Micro not find
She will not find it with old Nexia.

06.10.2015 18:05:00

She will not find it with old Nexia.
So show.

06.10.2015 18:06:00
So
identity m2.
trteey And what has changed? Edges improved? Well, judging by the examples enough
Or is there some other changes were?



Micro will not find
Fix against China? Well, ok, let it be so Let us something. That is because I feel that in a large area 24Mp resolution should be much better than on the micro 16Mp, and I can not prove Somewhere we sonevody bred

06.10.2015 18:10:00

Fix against China?
Yes, no, why?
against Fix Fix - so be honest.

06.10.2015 18:29:00

against Fix Fix - so be honest.
more honest whale against China. We have to think about the majority of people who buy the UPC.

06.10.2015 18:38:00

more honest whale against China.
. . . while Sony with its squalid blinokitozumom merges with a bang.

06.10.2015 18:55:00

Zzachem you have additional conditions are imposed? Let
is anything show, and then the audience bid

, and I, for example, the landscape is not a fix, I also fulfill your terms will not be able
And then compete at all? 24 greater than 16 - it's obvious. I'm not so much a comparison wonder how to find out what glass Sony can normally resolve it 24Mp matrix. And soap A6000 I have seen enough enough

06.10.2015 19:05:00

any glass Sony can properly resolve it 24Mp matrix
If the final image is possible to obtain at least 8MP, the already very good.

06.10.2015 19:07:00

If the final image is possible to obtain at least 8MP, the already very good.
8MP with 24Mp matrices? It will be small

06.10.2015 19:07:00


It will be small enough for me.
Here, for example, no more 10Mp.
232_. jpg:

06.10.2015 19:10:00

Quite
agree.
But I'm not about that. What for need matrix 24-28Mp if 8MP enough?

06.10.2015 19:10:00

that compete here at all? 24 greater than 16 - it's obvious.
Yeah. B 1. 5 times. Luchshest And how many times?
.
less interesting comparison of how to find out what glass Sony can properly resolve it 24Mp matrix
. Given
and adapters, it is possible to find enough.
truth will hang monstrously, and cheap.

06.10.2015 19:12:00

Haha need matrix 24-28Mp if 8MP enough?
I think you know the answer to this question.

06.10.2015 19:15:00

Yeah. B 1. 5 times. Luchshest And how many times?
And it depends on the optics. Depending on her luchshest and may be hudshestyu

Given and adapters, it is possible to find enough.
agree. But me personally optics crutches adapters are not interested at all.

truth will hang monstrously, and cheap. Well, if
from expensive, and then we can take the Chinese Zeiss


I think you know the answer to this question.
My answer may be different from other

06.10.2015 20:17:00

But I'm not about that. What for need matrix 24-28Mp if 8MP enough?
to dissolve itself on the new screw! ))

06.10.2015 20:20:00

to dissolve itself on the new screw! ))
First, a new USB flash drive (especially when talking about the Samsung Rawaha ), and only then screw upgrade a computer, and so on. N.. . .

06.10.2015 20:51:00

not to upgrade a computer invented 4K video

06.10.2015 21:36:00

8MP with 24Mp matrices? It will be small
*
way, about matrices. Let us return to our sheep All compete for a long time, and not on the leaves and on the water.

06.10.2015 21:49:00
As you can see
G5 merged Rykse M3.
in my opinion, it is obvious that the more megapixels, under certain conditions, "tear" less megapixel.

06.10.2015 22:05:00

in my opinion, it is obvious that the more megapixels, under certain conditions, "tear" less megapixel.
*
What does it mean in specific? At base ISO. In G5 is 160, at 125.
M3 By the way, G5 natseplen fix poltosu. He . . . Rykse merged. Test methods, if anyone interested - here

Behind the lens M3 vs kitozum Panas - worth rubbing after that? What do you think?


06.10.2015 22:10:00

What does it mean in specific?
now and then. At high ISO ryksa deflate. Or close deflate. Or in the body. Little did the camera uses can be found. . .

06.10.2015 22:16:00

now and then. At high ISO ryksa deflate. Or close deflate. Or in the body. Little did the camera uses can be found. . .
*
Soooo. That is all the fuckers Krivorukov or disbursed. Just tell me.
 

06.10.2015 22:17:00
As you can see
G5 merged Rykse M3.
All the rest do not you?
test tables, probably relieves pyksa better, but I somehow more interested in the practical application of the camera

What does it mean in specific?
then mean in the real world we have seen in the great examples that goes
difference with the ideal test conditions are often radically different

, you know that your 5N merged everything and rykse and micro?
Do not believe me? See the picture

06.10.2015 22:18:00

All the rest do not you?
*
Yeah. A necha three on one. not fair.

06.10.2015 22:19:00

Yeah. A necha three on one.
okay. . but climbs into his pocket!

06.10.2015 22:24:00

Well, for the test then say povnyatnee I Chota nevkuril. That is, think on the wall and leaves on a tree - different? I pralno understand?
And if the target to make the streets and tree branches nailed to the wall in the studio? Cho will - on the contrary?

06.10.2015 22:39:00

oleg_v_v, you know that your 5N merged everything and rykse and micro?
Not a single resolution. He, like many others, this picture explains everything.

06.10.2015 23:45:00

That is, think on the wall and leaves on a tree - different? I pralno understand?
Yeah, I do not think so. But between shooting, target, or bills and landscape are two big differences.
the street light, shadow, color, halftone, and that the target? Very contrasting picture.
clear hint?

Not a single resolution. He, like many others, this picture is the picture explains everything
Something you much sausage. That Give you permission, it is not a single resolution.
You have already determined it merges 5N resolution rykse or not?

And some pictures poke under which merges rykse G5 and the matrix, and resolution, and real-life examples for some reason out everything exactly the opposite

07.10.2015

Something you much sausage. That Give you permission, it is not a single resolution.
*
zakolbasilo you.
I stood up for the A6000, the owners were blown away and slapped Rykse kicks.

07.10.2015 0:52:00

So show.
I'll be home in the afternoon - show.


oleg_v_v, you know that your 5N merged everything and rykse and micro?
Do not believe me? See the picture

I see a picture and I do not notice the drain.


Rykse slapped kicks.
Next time be careful with examples. We must learn to handle even that.

07.10.2015 1:09:00

I look at the picture and do not notice the drain.
a significant drain on the autofocus

07.10.2015 1:12:00

Next time be careful with examples.
*
I speak well, izgalyatsya a background and color. And anyone can wash everything. For this purpose and need not equal.
shoot in zhpege disabling the squelch general, luminance noise is no color in place, resize to 3800 on a long, and that's all.
What interest?

07.10.2015 1:26:00

shoot in zhpege disabling the squelch, and that's all.
Never.

What interest?
Share an example that level, rather than initially loses everything.


a significant drain on the autofocus
When shooting on location dancing pop, for example, autofocus is not needed.

07.10.2015 1:59:00

Share an example that at
*
For me it is primarily the original size.

07.10.2015 2:08:00

For me it is primarily the original size.
In my opinion size should depend on the goals rather than on kamzhipega.

07.10.2015 3:24:00

In my opinion size should depend on the purposes
*
Well estessno. I put the last option without experiments.
Resize do not fundamentally. This should be done as Valeriy0053. Choto Shinyo everything about him as a moonlit night.
A really sunny, slightly red, sunset began. And with its contrast, I do not agree. Too much HMB.
ACR +:

Who should RAV - torment. http: // f-bit. ru / 696,261


07.10.2015 7:44:00

I stood up for the A6000, the owners were blown away and slapped Rykse kicks
stand up - it is punishable. . . A ryksa survive


I look at the picture and do not notice the drain.
and I'll show the same thing
Ryksa in another weight category

shoot in zhpege disabling the squelch general, luminance noise is no color in place, resize to 3800 on a long, and that's all.
may be so, but with 3800 the long is not much navoyuesh


RAV - torment
From the good - water is still normal, color spill there, you can swim
In the center you can compete, but the edges leave no chance


07.10.2015 8:38:00

autofocus is not needed.
manual'nye lenses - the lot of brake Sony

07.10.2015 8:42:00

manual'nye lenses - the lot of brake Sony
Come on. . . . even samsungovody FA removed. A modern sonevody
, having read the advertisement, even believe that they have the fastest AF *

07.10.2015 8:48:00

even samsungovody FA removed.
In-in. Only Sony has not gone.

07.10.2015 9:03:00
- Sonivody think the quickest trick them.
- Mikrovody - that they have.
- nikonvana owners do not doubt that they are ahead of the rest.
- BChGisty simply believe that the UPC does not autofocus, and guano.
- Connoisseurs manual optics claim that everything can be removed without any autofocus.

07.10.2015 9:12:00
quote:
:

Quite
agree.
But I'm not about that. What for need matrix 24-28Mp if 8MP enough?

And here we return to the old Nikon with zhirnopikselami.

07.10.2015 9:17:00

back to ancient Nikon with zhirnopikselami.
has been discussed.
Summary 12MP picture looks better if it is to remove 36 / 50Mp FF camera than the same picture shot at 12 / 16Mp FF. In the shadows of the balance may change, but I'm not sure.

07.10.2015 9:37:00

Summary 12MP picture looks better if it is to remove 36 / 50Mp FF camera than the same picture shot at 12 / 16Mp FF.
Members A7S do not think so

07.10.2015 9:40:00





Yes, comrades. . . Many can not hurt to check Fakie neighboring branches.

Each lens is bad in its merging with each other in something (a) Ensebeo

Disputes colleagues of megapixel in this branch rather have the motivation or justify their purchase or loyalty / fanaticism brand or just ambitious, but nothing to do with objectivity (c) chez

And so on. d.
 

07.10.2015 9:41:00

A7S users do not think
Still. . .
. . . overpay for zhirnopiksel and get good lighting significantly worse picture.

Maximum quality in the minimal form factor. What to buy? UPC (whale) or premium compact? We determine the selection of quality universal camera. (part 2)

info@www.about-digital-photo.com