Canon DPP v. 4. 3

Pages: 1

19.07.2015 14:50:00
Do I understand correctly that cr2-files (Canon 6D), previously processed in DPP v. 3. 14, when opened in DPP v. 4. 3 completely ignore all the fruits of the previous editing in version 3? E. Do not open as processed - all editing options files are set to default values?

strange somehow.
 

19.07.2015 15:03:00

Duc CR2 files, then no one is editing. . .

all options are kept separate from them.

19.07.2015 15:10:00

I understand that the response from the series "say anything"?

At least for version 3 of the edits are stored in cr2-file. Judging from everything, the same can be said of the 4 version.

19.07.2015 15:19:00

edits are stored in cr2-file.

So the program works with RAW files are not working. Basically. Never.

RAW - it is the source. He does not change. Result - issued for export. Settings are recorded separately - either a file (which may be located either near or in a special place) or in the service records of the converter.


Everything was much worse than I thought.

These idiots still smart enough to append to write the recipe directly into the RAW file - that is disrupting its authenticity and may work with other RAW-converters.

That is - the answer to the original question is now changing:

The new version of the format recipe has changed, and she did not understand the old recipe. But since the data itself is not changed with the matrix - the new version and displays the source code as it is.

Would it or I've found some records in the database - it would be easy to write a converter from the old format to the new one, as well - welcome to the world of idiots from Canon, which proposes to throw out their old operating time when changing versions softiny.

PS Personally, I would see such a free treatment of the source would be immediately uninstalled it and went to softinu to something more decent - good choice now is: from the fantastic DxO Optics, capable of Ray-Tracing method to correct errors or omissions images caused by imperfections obhektiva optics to simple Adobe Lightroom.


19.07.2015 15:41:00

So the program works with RAW files are not working. Basically. Never.
Take 3 DPP and be surprised.
))

19.07.2015 15:43:00

already surprised. More precisely - outraged idiocy seems to be adequate before the brand.

19.07.2015 15:50:00
I would still like to not discuss your surprise and peremptory, and hear something on the merits: is it possible the new version of DPP continue processing files previously adjusted in DPP 3?

Actually, there is a more general question - anyone working with the new version DPP?

-
I urge you not to discuss this topic idiocy Canon, the incorrectness of its approach, suschestovanie "really true" converters and stuff like that.

19.07.2015 16:25:00
I set myself a few days ago version 4. 3.
seems you are right: the files of my Canon G1X Mk. 2 treated in version 3. 14 pristine.

19.07.2015 17:15:00
Maybe somewhere there is a hidden setting in converter "edit the parameters of the previous version"? ))

Although, of course, it would be very funny option. ))

19.07.2015 17:41:00

online now looked kenona, in describing the DPP 4. 3 in black and white that the Foyle for processed in DPP earlier versions are not supported.

19.07.2015 17:44:00

Well, you'll love them! ))

can link vzlyanut?

Nikon Capture versions with the major release has always supported the use of the information on how to edit recorded in earlier versions.


19.07.2015 17:47:00
Duc right on the page to download. See "Caution!"

19.07.2015 20:28:00

quote:
"Recipes" Digital Photo Professional Series 4 can not be used instead of "recipes" Digital Photo Professional 1 through Digital Photo Professional 3.
quote:
The recipes in Digital Photo Professional 4-series can not be used interchangeably with the recipes in Digital Photo Professional 1 through Digital Photo Professional 3.

Well, generally speaking, I think it says here (including the original English warning) that recipes 4-ki can not be used in versions with 1 on the third. E. The earlier versions can not read the data later. This rule is typical for most software.

But on the incompatibility of the earlier versions to the 4th here, I think, is not said.
))

Which one concerns the interpretation of warnings on the subject?
))

19.07.2015 20:46:00
4-ka is very specific.
First - 64-bit. Second it does not just look deeply processed, but just different. There was a reconstruction of the channel.
What fundamental problems raise the previous settings are difficult to understand, but perhaps for hemorrhagic free utility did not recognize the appropriateness.

19.07.2015 22:46:00

What fundamental problems raise the previous settings are difficult to understand, but perhaps for hemorrhagic free utility did not recognize the appropriateness.
Yes, it is difficult to understand. ))

Continuing theses on the topic of gratuitousness and feasibility, it is easy to conclude not appropriate at all to bother with the development of version 4 in the presence of excellent)) 3rd! ))

19.07.2015 22:54:00
Yesterday staged over 4. 3 4. 2. 32, all the recipes are preserved. Poshustree work than the previous version.

19.07.2015 23:02:00
A
recipes created in version 3?

19.07.2015 23:14:00

No, 4. 2. The third and fourth versions never nebyli compatible recipes. But nobody forbids to use both.

20.07.2015 0:15:00

Bullshit, of course, complete. It turns out that you can not walk around with the results of the accumulated baggage handling, finished if necessary new chips version 4.

good word does not call! )

20.07.2015 0:19:00
This is a different program, and recipes are different, that does not interfere with each arc. The same file can be processed with both versions, and each will have its own recipe, t. E. In a single file to be three independent prescription faiths. 3 Ver. 4, and one recorded by the camera when shooting.

20.07.2015 13:27:00

Exactly this lack of forward compatibility and is atypical for the ugliness of the world of software.
))

-
ps
is not different programs - a version of the same program
))

20.07.2015 14:51:00

lack of upward compatibility

little more about compatibility. . . DPP4 not open raw old cameras (like 650D).

20.07.2015 14:59:00
For myself, I do not see the point in this compatibility. RAW is an intermediate format that they have me lie on the HDD only because that is the place allows, where space is the first candidates for removal. Re-processing RAW files, I have neither the time nor the inclination.
In fact, they are different programs with the same name. The fourth version is not something that the recipes she did Rava kenonovskih from most cameras do not support.

20.07.2015 15:02:00

little more about compatibility. . . DPP4 not open raw old cameras
So it was written immediately in "Supported". Although the previous reincarnation M, 1200D and 60D were added. We must try


reprocessed RAW files, I have neither the time nor the inclination.
Sometimes you have to force yourself to do an audit of the archive. At the same time to take another look at the old pictures

 

20.07.2015 15:10:00

So it was written directly in "Supported"
So, yes. . . But I have to be honest, there is not even looked. was sure somehow that the new version of the DPP must support all the same as the old + something else. But no. . . That's not a problem. For the old version of the file remains 3 (because it does not overwrite the Quartet), for the new - 4th. . .

20.07.2015 20:25:00
Download, set. Fun turned - now downloading site asks you to specify the serial number. My Grey did not pass on the Russian site.
I had to download from the Irish - there was normal serial

20.07.2015 21:15:00

I apologize. I glanced at the Russian thought, as always transfer curve and speculation their interpretation), but essentially the same thing, and it turns out they are different programs with the other sisters boyfriend are not compatible


I once upon a time for your 650D shaking and asked to enter a serial number, too. Since never again this was not


21.07.2015 11:55:00


and that this version 4, which is not in 3?

23.07.2015 14:25:00

and that this version 4, which is not in 3?
said reconstruction knocked channels.

23.07.2015 14:49:00

said reconstruction knocked channels.
Chet found I could be so.
At least when it comes to analog corresponding features in RT.

23.07.2015 14:59:00

Chet found I could be so.
The description was.
It may look like this - on exposure to negative details continue to recover, where to 3-ke no longer appear.

03.08.2015 17:22:00
When did the DPP 4, then I tried to twist it. For me it was minus 2:
1. Incompatibility of CR2 - I knew immediately looked their old files from the "troika".
2. Slower job as edited (in a separate window I, for example, the exposure and the effect can be seen after a few seconds), and upon conversion.
now, tried to experiment a little more, and 3 and 4 to compare the results of the output.
the same settings, in Vol. H. Field, 4-ka gave a little more sharp details, both of exposure were -0. 8.
If both frames to put a highlight in the -2 to remove the overexposure, the difference is, you can see that in the 4-ke do it better.

03.08.2015 20:24:00

Slower job as edited (in a separate window I, for example, the exposure and the effect can be seen after a few seconds), and upon conversion.
I on the old Core 5 2500K had no such problems. .

04.08.2015 8:27:00

2. Slower job as edited (in a separate window I, for example, the exposure and the effect can be seen after a few seconds), and upon conversion.

on one of the computers with AMD integrated graphics platform, DPP 4 runs noticeably slower than its predecessor. Put a simple graphics card, the speed of response to the sliders had risen to more or less comfortable. Output to TIFF, however, remained the same slow.

on Intel i7 everything quickly.

06.11.2017 20:25:00
Once again, after a long break, after trying DPP 4 (fresh version - 4. 7. 20. 0), it found support for CR2-files from cameras of old (and not top-notch) models. Unfortunately, the correction data made in DPP 3. 15. 0. 0, are not recognized, but if the lens data is saved in the data file, its size increases by only a few percent, and not twice, as in the triplet. Well, yes - the fourth (at least on my quad-core) is slightly slower than the third version, but, in my opinion, it began to work faster than the former one.

27.11.2017 12:02:00
By the way. I have 4. 4. * and Q6600 quad (2, 2. 4 GHz). Compared with the old tupit much stronger, pauses when editing compared to the old at times more, a few seconds passes, while it crooked, even with a banal change in exposure. Indecently tupit, shame kenon-neoptimizatoru.

27.11.2017 12:55:00

Your processor is too old already for such programs.

27.11.2017 17:18:00

It's normal. Simply, it seems, their crooks did not try to run on these antique pieces of iron. I doubt that there is an optimization under the core i * line at the instruction level. Although. . .

27.11.2017 17:23:00
When I moved from i3-530 to i7-3770k, RAW conversion time decreased every ten.

27.11.2017 18:10:00

For some tasks - very critical. The Java compiler javaskript on the dual i5 mobile is faster than quad kore2 visually at times. Most likely no one in their right mind is testing on old computers while developing, and on new architectures, it works reasonably well. Well, in general, I'm not happy with how the upgrade version went. . .

28.11.2017 1:59:00
By the way, the latest version of DPP 4. 7. 20. 0
Maybe it's worth upgrading.

15.06.2018 16:51:00
Latest version:

Digital Photo Professional 4. 8. 30 for Windows
Last Updated: 18-Apr-2018

Russian manual.

https: // en. nodevice. com / user-manuals / digital-cameras-and-frames / canon / eos-1000d / 1017438? d = 793420


05.10.2018 12:16:00

06.10.2018 13:51:00

06.10.2018 14:02:00
 

09.10.2018 19:01:00
Pages: 1

Canon DPP v. 4. 3

info@www.about-digital-photo.com