Nikon D3300

Pages: 1 2 3 4

09.01.2014 7:13:00

http: // www. ixbt. com / news / hard / index. shtml? 17/53/26
http: // imaging. nikon. com / lineup / dslr / d3300 /
 

09.01.2014 11:10:00
More interesting is the new kit, which is made by folding, thus significantly reduce its size in the transport state. The main thing - is not affected if the optical quality?

09.01.2014 12:11:00

main thing - has not suffered any optical quality?
nikonklabe spend too much time on his mtf "s - say should be extremely good.

09.01.2014 18:12:00

nikonklabe spend too much time on his mtf "s - say should be extremely good.
wondering how it will behave in the 24MP. It's time to update the old man alone Nikon 18-55...

09.01.2014 19:46:00
Yes, you have it all started. Already know how to write and read yet?
http: // www. ixbt. com / news / hard / index. shtml? 17/53/46
All that is done, all the worse. Those who do not understand in the photo, I suggest 18-105, I was at one time a decent copy of fell. Recently bought a Nikon D3100 companion to 18-55 without VR, I took off this lens - are still afraid to remember the horror.

09.01.2014 21:26:00

18-55 without VR
I've got a - Mlyn, rezchayshaya lens . however, the first version with ED glass.

09.01.2014 22:41:00

I've got a - Mlyn, rezchayshaya lens. however, the first version with ED glass
Interestingly, such a spread? The other friend 18-55VR will be better. For the interest of comparing these two lenses compacts Canon G9, Canon IXUS 860 and the Panasonic FZ30. In detail worse Nikon lenses proved Panasonic FZ30, both soap dish Canon better. 18-105 markedly better than anyone except G9, which is only a few gave him permission. A little 70-300VR surpassed 18-105, but in a different test. Shooting on a tripod on the D90 primarily on 35mm focal length of Canon G9. I photographed the truth is not the worlds, and weed out the window at a distance of 40m. I laid out to a photo, but compared detail for yourself, pictures deleted. If you can believe naslovo, I have everything in hand will fall on the resolution to end the 70 check. In any BB and bokeh I have always been on-Men.

12.01.2014 14:40:00
The price of the new 18-55 VR is $ 250, if you take apart

12.01.2014 21:29:00
What is the button on the whale? It is that, as in the umbrella? Press and it opened?

13.01.2014 14:43:00

13.01.2014 16:56:00

Thanks! Cool! Now the old whale carcass will be harder to sell.

13.01.2014 18:46:00
Lovely way kitёnysh, better pigs GII and VR G - it optically interesting new 24 MP matrices. . .

15.01.2014 15:19:00
Do I understand correctly that these aparata no quick (one-touch) access management: ISO, WB, Focus mode

?

15.01.2014 15:29:00
There are two touches - the button (i) for aid

15.01.2014 16:08:00
I asked about the one-touch.
simply change your thought but it is important to 1100d quick access to main functions. . On my have it all and just used

23.05.2014 12:51:00
Exposure bracketing can somehow tie to him? Macros something? Or control from a PC to emulate?

gugleniya for d3200 gave the result that it is impossible d3200.

26.05.2014 11:23:00
the question is removed, took d5200

24.07.2014 21:55:00
The Matrix in a subject, such as in 5300 and 7100 or not? Something in mm and vary in pixels too

26.07.2014 11:33:00

matrix in a subject is the same as in 5300 and 7100 or not? Something in mm and vary in pixels too
no one has yet analyzed the D3300, and D5300 and D7100 in different matrices, in D5300 by Sony, in D7100 by Toshiba (D5200 have also from Toshiba)

19.11.2014 13:55:00
​​ quote:
:
Exposure bracketing can somehow tie to him? Macros something? Or control from a PC to emulate?

gugleniya for d3200 gave the result that it is impossible d3200.

gugleniya further brought to the Helicon Remote
http: // www. photo-soft. ru / index. html

22.11.2014 1:29:00
matrix D3300 / D5300:
astronomer
If that information is not available, look at published image sensor package photos. Look at wire bonds or package pins / shape. Sony tends to use specific sources of IC packages and they are consistent in generation. For example the 134PQFP for IMX038 and IMX071, and the 158 CLCC in IMX021 and 216CLCC in IMX028 / IMX094 / IMX128 FF CMOS. These are sufficiently different from Nikon or Toshiba origin. It "s like detective work.

And lastly, FYI, the sensor in D5300 / D3300 is Sony IMX193. I" ll leave the source out as a homework for anyone is interested.

13.02.2015 6:55:00
strange somehow, the camera is good, and the theme - dead. . .

13.02.2015 7:03:00

strange somehow, the camera is good, and the theme - dead. . .
properly, the camera is so good that spodvigaet owners to engage in "direct fotoobyazannostyami" and not sit on the forums besides, the camera is absolutely hassle, so infinitely fray owners within the community some of its bugs and glitches - just unnecessarily. . .

13.02.2015 7:05:00

camera is absolutely hassle
such did happen?

13.02.2015 7:18:00

such did happen?
not that only Fuji, Samsung and Olympus)

13.02.2015 7:20:00

not that only Fuji, Samsung and Olympus)
Monsieur racist. but oh well. Tiomka dead even against other Aryan absolute masterpieces. . .
 

13.02.2015 8:02:00

Monsieur racist
neee, Monsieur has just a hard look at all

but oh well. Tiomka dead
Tiomka about gold bullion can not be dead - that there is something to discuss?

23.01.2016 15:39:00
And no one do not irritate instead of frames bright LEDs viewfinder focus point? Question for those who have not the first SLR.

23.01.2016 16:40:00
and they did not have the adaptive brightness? Adjustments in the menu is not present, but got the impression from the use.

23.01.2016 18:14:00
quote:
:
and they did not have the adaptive brightness? Adjustments in the menu is not present, but got the impression from the use.
I do not know, I just looked at the store. But the more the brightness of the room such points is not necessary. But much whether these are evident svetodiodiki against the backdrop of sun-drenched landscape? Probably not seem so bright. Thank you said about the adaptation.
I D3300 or D5300 considered the second lens unit 70-300VR. But something for everyday use need 18-55VR2 or 18-105. The first did not seem to scold, but 18-105 Quality glasses are not to be better for the 24 megapixel resolution?

23.01.2016 18:21:00

But something for everyday use need 18-55VR2 or 18-105. The first did not seem to scold, but 18-105 Quality glasses are not to be better for the 24 megapixel resolution?
18-105 lens old, will not be better

23.01.2016 18:49:00
quote:
:

But something for everyday use need 18-55VR2 or 18-105. The first did not seem to scold, but 18-105 Quality glasses are not to be better for the 24 megapixel resolution?
18-105 lens is old, it is better not
18-105 But still worth 12-18 thousand. Rub. when 18-55 VR II 5, 2-7 thousand. For something as take 2 and a half times more. Although not surprise me that they are the same in detail.

23.01.2016 18:52:00

For something as take 2 and a half times more.
as usual, the range


Although not surprise me that they are the same in detail.
they are not the same, better 18-55


23.01.2016 19:08:00

Although not surprise me that they are the same in detail.
they are not the same, better 18-55

Thanks for the advice. While I understand that items may vary.

23.01.2016 19:12:00

While I understand that items may vary.
it here niprichem


Thanks for the advice.
what?

23.01.2016 19:22:00
quote:
:
Thanks for the advice.
what?
helped in choosing between the new 18-55 and 18-105.

23.01.2016 23:11:00
:
And whom did not irritate instead of frames bright LEDs viewfinder focus point? Question for those who have not the first SLR.
not annoying, but it is very unusual, yes. The most embarrassing is that the selected focus point is not selected frame.

18-105 But still worth 12-18 thousand. Rub. when 18-55 VR II 5, 2-7 thousand. For something as take 2 and a half times more.
to the large range of focal. I once 18-105 did not like and I replaced him at first 18-55vr. A new kit very much, I take on the diaphragm 8, 3300 with a rather sharp.

04.02.2016 1:05:00
quote:
[] :
:

18-105 But still worth 12-18 thousand rubles.. when 18-55 VR II 5, 2-7 thousand. For something as take a 2 and a half times more.
For a greater range of focus. I once 18-105 did not like and I changed it to the first 18-55vr. A new kit very much, I take on the diaphragm 8, a rather sharp with 3300.

Here the author of many of the old Pro Photo is expressed in the debate, that "rare stuff... Shall be replaced immediately for at least 18-105." I a few years ago, and I compared their 18-105 70-300VR, focus on the 70 and 105 to resolve the difference was minimal, any interest in favor 70-300VR. The truth is 12 megapixels. D90.
http: // vmirefoto. blogspot. ru / 2014/01 / nikon-d3300-nik ... -nikon-d3300. html
http: // vmirefoto. blogspot. com / 2014/01 / nikon-d3300-ni ... 48285905607102337

04.02.2016 1:32:00

True to 12MP. D90.
it is large in

difference there still filter


04.02.2016 21:13:00
I at 12MP 18-105 also liked it and wanted to take the d3300. I tried a few instances, and they all turned out to be much worse resolution than the new 18-55VRII.

04.02.2016 21:24:00
quote:
:

True to 12MP. D90.
it is large in difference



Addition of 04. 02. 2016 01: 33:

there still filter
antialiasingovy you mean? I am embarrassed that Canon is not steamed about this sale and he has more than the Nikon. Something pro with Canon Nikon did not rush to buy, like the absence of AA learned.
Even as the nikonist doubt that 24 megapixels. D3300 matrix without AA is better than "poor" 22 megapixel Canon 5D Mark III with allegedly unnecessary AA filter. It would be funny if it were not so sad. I think we are deceiving.

04.02.2016 21:50:00

doubt that 24 megapixels. D3300 matrix without AA is better than "poor" 22 megapixel Canon 5D Mark III with allegedly unnecessary AA filter.

incorrect to compare the crop with FF. On FF resolution (not to be confused with the number of megapixels!) Turns up already just because of the physical size of the matrix.

About AA filter can search in the internet article about how it was removed from the matrix, there is a photo taken with AA filter and without it, the difference is visible very well. It is better to see once than to discuss a long time unknown.

05.02.2016 0:26:00
A year rented with fifty dollars on a subject 1. 8. The biggest drawback for me - poor autofocus. In conjunction with this lens very often it misses the focus. A little regret that I hurried to buy D3300, it would be better saved for 5D Mark III


About AA filter can search in the internet article about how it with the matrix removed, there is a photo taken with AA filter and without it, the difference is visible very well. It is better to see once than to discuss a long time unknown.
will be inordinately grateful for the provision of reference, a quick search on google did not give anything intelligible.

05.02.2016 4:35:00

I am embarrassed that Canon is not steamed about this sale and he has more than the Nikon.
steamed. 50Mp done without hours used display. sales - generally a strange thing, by inertia people kenon opkupayut


little sorry that rushed to buy D3300, it would be better saved for 5D Mark III
750 half the price, but the focus for 7200 was enough ...

05.02.2016 8:58:00

I can credit that he saw long ago, so sorry, for you to look busy. Google will help, but the time spent will be repaid interesting material. View is really worth.

Damn, lazy, keep: http: // www. forum. minolta-club. ru / showthread. php? t = 36439

PS Is Google blocked all that they themselves can not find the right material?
Infantilism what else.
Sorry, did not mean to offend.

05.02.2016 11:07:00
It seems to me that in order to realize the potential of the current crop matrices, 24 Mpix and, moreover, without the filter of AA, preferably much more often than with other cameras use a sturdy tripod, and the time delay for optimal max. Quality of the diaphragm 5. 0 to 11. 0, the best focal length of zoom range, ie. e., where they can solve these Mpix 24 without soap. (C zumami expensive and simple, in the optical circuit, Fix bit easier)

And Fullframe this nuance is manifested not so acute. There is noticeable micro-motion blur is less pronounced. It is possible and with shallow depth of field to play, savor beautiful bokeh, and so on. D. But even complex landscapes on modern crop matrices may look surprisingly transparent and naturally at moderate magnification. So that anyone budgetary whale - is also a powerful tool in experienced hands. IMHO

05.02.2016 11:23:00

quality diaphragm from 5. 0 to 11. 0,
11 - already beyond the limit differential

05.02.2016 11:24:00

agree! I would have ruled her cropped from some of the most acute, but sometimes you need a macro to squeeze everything possible.
 

05.02.2016 11:26:00

It seems to me that to realize the potential of the current crop matrices, 24 Mpix and, moreover, without the filter AA,
in your terms "implementation matrix potential" is the same as the per-pixel sharpness?
Pages: 1 2 3 4

Nikon D3300

info@www.about-digital-photo.com