Advise compact camera down with quality auto mode to 10000r.

Pages: 1

30.12.2013 18:57:00
Good day.
I know that the forum has a bunch of these, it was, but all the camera down now obsolete or discontinued.
need a compact camera down for a girl, so tavarischi professionals before writing anything please forget that fotike have any settings and modes other than "auto" and if you tell me please what the camera down within 10 kilorubley can take as much as possible with the best quality shooting in auto mode.

PS Umlyayu - no need to write, that the quality of a car on any sucks (I know very well) and it has to take a more advanced model, this girl for anything in life will not touch the buttons except power, zoom and shoot .
 

30.12.2013 22:54:00
Buy iPhone 4 girl and above. Fotik with access to the attached instagramm free.

30.12.2013 23:45:00
Maybe, Nikon 1 S1, price 10 thousand (with an official guarantee). This is the cheapest model of the Nikon 1 does not praise the work in manual mode (up to some of the settings are difficult to reach), praised automatically. This camera with interchangeable lens. But if not interchangeable, I do not see what else you can choose the Nikon for the money - not a bar of soap P330 praised for automatic mode, S9500 has a large multiplicity of the zoom (but can still suitable, to learn on their own). From Nikon is not the same is the Panasonic GF5, but probably better Nikon 1 S1 (IMHO).
iPhone I would not buy even a dog (IMHO), however, it has no bearing on the question.

31.12.2013 19:48:00

Maybe, Nikon 1 S1, the price of 10 thousand
Thanks for the advice of course, a large matrix camera down and I am sure the pictures are of appropriate quality, but there is no stabilization Vryal whether a girl with a portable camera tripod will carry And portability he is not very (s purely to throw in your bag and wearing a holster) and the optical zoom is not (I hope they know how to use it )
What do you say about Panasinic Lumix DMC-SZ7?

31.12.2013 20:28:00

no stabilization
- if you shoot people, the stub is not necessary - it will only compensate for hand tremors at slow shutter speeds. The movement of people can not compensate for the stub. For this reason, the shutter speed of 1/100 everyone will have to put at such a stub is required. Tried this
S1 - a nice machine and gives good shots. At its price on the soap dish is better not to watch.


portability he is not very
- he has good portability with 11-27 for a handbag at the time

no optical zoom
- then 11-27, if not zoom?


31.12.2013 22:49:00

Maybe, Nikon 1 S1
What it seemed to me that he is better than the Canon S110 shoots. It is fit to ISO 6400 /

31.12.2013 23:12:00
abbreviatur

the Nikon 1 stabilizer, if there is - in the lens. The lens 11-27. 5 no stabilization. The other lens 10-30 it is. However, some, buying a camera with a lens 10-30, then still bought his stead 11-27, 5. It is compact, and the lack of stabilization and even contributes to blurring, but without the sharpness is good. In general, you can find a comparison of these lenses.
Canon S110 - also an option. Although the picture quality is not as praise, but some use the camera cost 2000-3000 rubles and satisfied. So it may be a special quality is not necessary, it is a matter of taste.

01.01.2014 12:50:00

quote:
and it has to take a more advanced model
Here's a look this review & gt; & Gt; & Gt;
With machine no problem. The lens quality even whales from DSLRs kills.
There are, however, already P7800, but he does not fit into the budget.

Example night shooting handheld. There are not many cameras that is able to.


01.01.2014 13:05:00

- R7700 larger and in 1, 5 times harder than s1. By S1 can then be inexpensive televichok buy.

03.01.2014 0:08:00

quote:
R7700 larger and in 1, 5 times harder
So that's a plus. But, more importantly, that the P7700 is sold cheaper than any zoom and pseudo and SLR. And another question, can I shoot something we conceal glass from close range. Most often, they lather macro distances. A
buy a bar of soap with a few fixes that this masochism. All deficiencies soap dish and one advantage SLRs.
 

03.01.2014 0:19:00

So that's a plus. But, more importantly, that the P7700 is sold cheaper
- my wife chose the S1 (New Year presented), it is not only much smaller, but still cheaper. The second advantage - the matrix of larger and less megapixels.

03.01.2014 2:21:00
Nikon P7700 - the old model, it is difficult to find for sale, but you can - the price of 13,000 rubles (with an official guarantee), instead it has a Nikon P7800 for 14,500 rubles. Since the question was about fotike 10 thousand, they do not quite fit (unless you increase the maximum amount).

03.01.2014 21:08:00

quote:
price 13,000 py
Yes, indeed. . . Took a year ago, and now looked at Amazon-e, the price has not changed. On Ebay has over $ 350, but there is a risk to take. Thought, as usual, at a hundred and a half decent shops in the fall. Well, then, indeed, was a good camera. P7800 is even better (appeared viewfinder), but it is still $ 100 more expensive. It is strange that you should so cheap. Maybe it refarbished?



quote:
my wife chose
there will not argue. P7XXX the color of the dress not pick the New Year. Yes and no extra buttons. Navёl and removed.

04.01.2014 4:12:00

iPhone I would not buy even a dog (IMHO), however, it has no bearing on the question
And here is the reason. . . dpreview: Smartphones versus DSLRs versus film: A look at how far we "ve come , believe that the difference in image quality between smartphones and DSLRs last decade, of course there are, but the gap is narrowing, and sometimes even frightening pace...

I have given a link to the last page to conclusions. You can look through the previous pages with 100% sprinkled pictures. In no case did not try to convince you, just wanted to share a curious illustration of what an iPhone can be considered as a substitute for tsifromylnitsy ladies.

04.01.2014 9:21:00

quote:
. . . differences in image quality between smartphones and DSLRs. . .
iPhone 5 is worth twice as much as the budget DSLR. They have full-length movies filmed. It is clear that for the money it needs to be competitive. DSLR there is another problem. They need to buy the lens, which can cost more than the camera itself, if it is the zoom. For a bar of soap and phones do not need to buy more. In addition, the lack of interchangeable lens and a modest increase the size of the operational capabilities of compact digital cameras and phones.
But here whether phones to catch up with SLR cameras for DD. . . By reducing the pixel size, make it is becoming increasingly difficult. Maybe that's why the network so hard to find samples of pictures from the phone with a big DD.

07.01.2014 17:15:00

Example night shooting handheld. There are not many cameras that is able to.
ISO 1600 for the soap dish? Well it's already beyond.

07.01.2014 23:41:00
quote:
:

iPhone I would not buy even a dog (IMHO), however, it has no bearing on the question
And here is the reason. . . dpreview: Smartphones versus DSLRs versus film: A look at how far we "ve come , believe that the difference in image quality between smartphones and DSLRs last decade, of course there are, but the gap is narrowing, and sometimes even frightening pace...

I have given a link to the last page to conclusions. You can look through the previous pages with 100% sprinkled pictures. In no case did not try to convince you, just wanted to share a curious illustration of what an iPhone can be considered as a substitute for tsifromylnitsy ladies.

There are no full-size image, carved from pieces of possible photos from different angles * distance. Net advertising.
 

08.01.2014 22:12:00
I would recommend for this price look-aperture compact Canon S110 (the most intuitive), Olympus XZ-10 (the most recent of these), Fujifilm XF-1 (most beautiful). All fit into the budget. If you start to crawl, then is there such a ladder in increments of 1 m. P. - Mama Do not Cry! All normally removed from the machine, all decent jpeg and besides, all have vozmozhnot growth (which however can not be used). Recommend UPC if not crawl out of the auto makes no sense, and even on compact nikon1 loses (see the camera bed)
Pages: 1

Advise compact camera down with quality auto mode to 10000r.

info@www.about-digital-photo.com