It is necessary to take the Canon EOS 1000D SLR as the first?

Pages: 1

17.03.2012 0:21:00
Not satisfied with the quality of compact digital cameras for 2000 USD. (200 euros) Should I start a new level with the Canon EOS 1000D, I mean the body itself. . . or to a qualitatively new level need something poluchshe?
 

17.03.2012 0:25:00

or to a qualitatively new level need something poluchshe?
What better than a good dish soap (CD) or a bad SLR? (Part 23)

17.03.2012 0:33:00
Reading - "jovdet:" from your reference nasmelyus ask a question. . . If
high skills soap technology. . . whether the principle of winning if reach an intermediate level of SLR photo equipment?

read - "jovdet:" from your reference nasmelyus ask a question. . . If
high skills soap technology. . . whether the principle of winning if reach an intermediate level of SLR photo equipment?


17.03.2012 1:09:00

high technology skills soap

You really do not lose your mind, there was discussed "competition with soap" RICOH, and not with any dormice / Samsung
+ again, it is one thing to compare landscapes (which do not run away)) and every sport / animals / children, where the compact brake fundamentally not kept pace with the object and the idea of ​​the photographer. . . On simple aquarium fish SLR "make" a bar of soap 1: 100 as a minimum. . .

a general theme arhipyatnichnaya)) there used it and glue. . .
read - "jovdet:" from your reference nasmelyus ask a question. . .
all the answers to all your questions - in the topic in the following thousands of posts))

19.03.2012 7:12:00

not satisfied with the quality compact digital cameras for 2000 USD. (200 euros) Should I start a new level with the Canon EOS 1000D, I mean the body itself. . . or to a qualitatively new level need something poluchshe?

Absolutely suit, he bought to begin with Canon 1000D and the cheapest 50 fixed thereto. With soap holders and can not be compared.

19.03.2012 7:14:00
Today should not take 1000D and 1100D. 1000D is still a bit old.
 

19.03.2012 8:51:00
When I had a child - I "missed" his first New Year t. To. Soapbox for $ 500 was not able to remove byst moving object in subdued holiday lighting. This was a good incentive for instant purchase 60D + 24-105 + 50/1. 8

In my opinion, it is better to buy a little used. y. canon 550d / 600d, than 1000d / 1100d t. To. for about tezhe money - and get a decent camera. But if the camera is not needed (in vain! Think again!), It is possible and 1000d.

Soap can only rejoice in the bright equatorial light for shooting stationary subjects, then of course I exaggerate, but to remove the child in the winter when light chandelier 5 llamas 50 W - unrealistic - continuous blurring and brake chamber.

Pro Glass:

24-105 / 4 - decorated street shots and shots with flash in a room, but 0 for 4. poorly-lit room enough.

50/1. 8 - gave decent shots in low light, but it felt cheap (autofocus does not always have time, zhuzhit t. To. No USM, rattles, flimsy - after the fall broke into 2 parts). But for 3000 rubles - this is just a song, rather than glass. I do not regret that year to use it, though, and sold for only 500 rubles for parts.

50/1. 4 - a magnificent glass, devoid of most of shortcomings 50/1. 8, but it is also better not to drop

50/1. 2 - take out, I want to buy. Magic crap. Room 12 meters lit flashlight in one corner, and the camera shoots what is in the other corner at the expense of the reflected light at ISO 100 and images are obtained as day. When switching to a higher ISO - you can shoot motion under the same lighting.

Sorry about the lyrics with glass, but it's a question of choosing the most appart. The device - it is an opportunity to fasten the glass plus a decent shutter speed, and of vedeokamera if necessary. (There is also the question of the matrix m. To. It significantly affects the formed image, but here it is necessary to understand the seriousness of the budget and hobbies.)

Look how and what others are shooting at different cameras and different glass:

http: // ru . pixel-peeper. com / adv /? lens = 16 & amp; camera = 9 ... ax = none & amp; res = 3

can not be considered separately from the carcass camera glasses. The kit is selected for specific tasks and primary here ratio of focal lengths with aperture optics, rather than the model of the camera.

the portraits, 1000d in conjunction with 50/1. 2 - tear 7d with a whale (in the same hand).

19.03.2012 9:14:00
quote:
:
50/1. 4 - a magnificent glass, devoid of most of shortcomings 50/1. 8, but it is also better not to drop
He greatly helps blend - and hares unnecessary cuts, and the front part protects against shocks.

19.03.2012 9:52:00

4. 0 for poorly-lit room enough.
've got to understand that "bad light" and "well-lit, but a bit dark" - are two different things. If indeed "poorly lit." the aperture by 1 stop wider does not help - will be "poorly lit, but lighter."

19.03.2012 12:03:00
quote:
:

4. 0 for poorly-lit room enough.
've got to understand that "bad light" and "well-lit, but a bit dark" - are two different things. If indeed "poorly lit." the aperture by 1 stop wider does not help - will be "poorly lit, but lighter."


Just a subjective assessment of what chandeliers (5 to 50 W) winter evening for 24-105 / 4 - small t. To. In these conditions it is necessary to lift up to 1600 ISO and noise is, and if there is a question about shooting very moving object at a speed of 1/300 second, ISO need to turn up even higher and in this case it turns out such a noise that the glass (and matrix) want to throw out.

course I Can pyhnut the ceiling or in a diffuser, but the flash kills all light and shadow and makes any photo - the photo on the passport. And build a house for each frame of a system of three outbreaks - too gemorno for home photo.
 

19.03.2012 12:11:00

course I Can pyhnut the ceiling or in a diffuser, but the flash kills all light and shadow and makes any photo - the photo on the passport
Portrait assumes no harsh shadows on the face (ie. E. The flash at the ceiling + reflector to illuminate the front - "filling"). Portrait
full coverage involves slow-moving subject. Shooting
interior suggests a tripod, the slow and low iso.
to run in the original light the subject - it's fantastic. . . (In the sense that there are no miracles)
IMHO
Pages: 1

It is necessary to take the Canon EOS 1000D SLR as the first?

info@www.about-digital-photo.com