tamron 17-50 vc and nikon d90 vs nikon d7000

Pages: 1

25.10.2011 11:58:00
Good afternoon.

decided to replace its d3000 , but do not know which one is best suited for lens tamron 17-50 vc (with Stabia) .

heard that nikon d7000 is not very good "friends" with this lens, soap on the frame, the focus is not always stable, and others. He would like but I doubt d7000.
therefore began to think about d90 .

device is purchased for family photos and videos (video rare).

So the question. . . . what to choose?

PS can look towards d5100, but the problem is that the lens will cover the flash ((

Thank you.
 

25.10.2011 15:06:00
D7000 or D5100 + ext. blaze = the money somewhere about the same.
d90 not take.

25.10.2011 17:14:00
Thank
And what can you say (write) about soap and poor focus Tamron and d7000? .
This matter of chance or regularity?

25.10.2011 18:15:00
I have a Tamron 17-50 but without stub. with normal sharpness. but nedosvet - almost constantly. A feeling that the real luminosity is not 2. 8. So IMHO - it is better to take Nikkor 16-85

25.10.2011 18:58:00
quote:
: SpasiboA what can you say (write) about soap and poor focus Tamron and d7000? .
This matter of chance or regularity?

Soap Tamron 17-50 VC note in the forums regardless D7000 or another.
If so need a stabilizer, the m. B. better on the Sigma 17-50 / 2. 8 OS to see?

25.10.2011 22:05:00
quote:

If so need a stabilizer, the m. B. better on the Sigma 17-50 / 2. 8 OS to see?
IMHO - it is better to take a Nikkor 16-85

fact that Tamron is already there.
Not willing to lens, but I want to change the device.

therefore concerned about the issue. . . . choose a device or d7000 , d90 or d5100 ? ? ((

25.10.2011 23:01:00
quote:
: So concerned about the issue. . . . choose a device or d7000 , d90 or d5100 ? ? ((
D300s since much on a matter, not particularly expensive d7000, but at high ISO pleasant addition to other advantages:


25.10.2011 23:51:00

D300s since much on a matter, not particularly expensive d7000, but at high ISO pleasant addition to other advantages:

Judging by the picture 7D even better.
A K-5 is still better than 7D.

26.10.2011 1:23:00
quote:
: Judging by the picture 7D even better.
A K-5 is still better than 7D.
This is not the essence, under their existing TS lens does not accommodate.

26.10.2011 9:37:00
Yeah, now also appears in the list D300s ((.

Still, I have a question and hangs in the air.

Which camera is preferable to Tamron 17-50 VC of I submitted.

Thank you for any information))

PS. and D300s is a topic only whether such opportunities for family photos, I do not know

26.10.2011 17:51:00
quote:
:
D300s since much on a matter, not particularly expensive d7000, but at high ISO pleasant addition to other advantages:

color at high ISO better preserves the D7000 and noise standards.

Matrix D90-D300 inferior.

Matrix D5100 and D7000 in one if the Tamron already have, then one option: go to the store, take pictures and decide. After you shoot, you should arrange the photo.

26.10.2011 18:09:00
quote:
:
I Tamron 17-50 but without stub. with normal sharpness. but nedosvet - almost constantly.
If the time - it's not terrible, exposure compensation to plus and forget. I was once with a Tamron 28-75 it was so.

26.10.2011 22:44:00
quote:
: color at high ISO better preserves the D7000 and noise standards.
Which color? Red D7000 swam in another ISO800 , yellow in comparison with the D300s floats on ISO1600. Blue and green are not completely better than the D300s. Worst of all things from the D7000 with black color - not at all on any ISO while the black color D300s can be considered as a reference the competition.

quote:
S. and D300s is a topic only whether such opportunities for family photos, I do not know
Well you is something D3000 did not accept? Just D300s will be a dramatic improvement. Especially in handling extraneous optics. Buy yourself more to it a thread of classical mechanics type 105/2. 5 for portraits.
 

26.10.2011 23:20:00
Pyhu to D3000 and all.

27.10.2011 0:03:00
quote:
:
pyhu to D3000 and all.
people hotit video.

27.10.2011 0:13:00

or d5100? ?

take d5100 and video will be removed.

27.10.2011 9:15:00
Thank you to everyone involved in this thread))
do so.
Kindly show d5100, d7000 d300s and in the store and going to choose.

Thank you again))

27.10.2011 17:24:00
quote:
: Which color?

I saw another test, he was in the spring or winter. Pictures of bouquet.
So I took off D90 and D7000 see advantages in noise at high ISO.

D90 almost the same 300 minutes, and the pictures in the Internet is not always indicative.

27.10.2011 21:48:00
quote:
: I saw another test, he was in the spring or winter.
I brought laboratory tests most authoritative fotoressursa network. There excluding the impact of the hands, lighting and spring to winter. There EXIF.

28.10.2011 14:21:00
Good afternoon)).

I've still puzzled selection of shops to buy, always bought in PLEER. RU but now that it sykotno. Still buy expensive toys, as if not to miscalculate with warranty and quality shopping.

I would like to know what stores do you think deserve attention, and what better to get round?

PS. Shops in Moscow

28.10.2011 14:23:00
quote:
:
most authoritative fotoressursa network
They have so directly and says "the most authoritative fotoreSSurs network"?

28.10.2011 18:24:00
quote:
: I brought laboratory tests most authoritative fotoressursa network. There excluding the impact of the hands, lighting and spring to winter. There EXIF.

you bring tests, and I compare their pictures.

general, "The visualisations of RAW data (and the accompanying downloadable JPEGs) are based on a standard development process using Adobe Camera Raw" speaks primarily about the capabilities of Adobe Camera Raw in the case of the default settings. But the fact that the default settings are the same does not mean that they are the best. In my opinion, they are more suitable for the evaluation of field (the thickness of the AA filter), and to assess the colors are not very.

28.10.2011 21:36:00
quote:
:
quote:
:
most authoritative fotoressursa network
They have so directly and says "the most authoritative fotoreSSurs network"?

Yes. Here . And it is hard to argue with.

quote:
: what stores do you think deserve attention
adorama and bhphotovideo
quote:
: what better get round?
Just stores in Moscow and the CIS in general :

. . . Will take OTC aids for Russia? I know that we designed equipment, to reduce the cost after a robbery at customs, pass inspection and OTC has specials. marking.

29.10.2011 21:29:00
Good evening.

interested in the question of official guarantee about buying camera

What can you say about these cantors
Foto. ru
and / or
onlinetrade. ru
and
m video ))

I've heard that there is a guarantee okay

Somebody took from them? Thank
 

30.10.2011 16:59:00
quote:
:
I Tamron 17-50 but without stub. with normal sharpness. but nedosvet - almost constantly. A feeling that the real luminosity is not 2. 8. So IMHO - it is better to take Nikkor 16-85

And how you work with the included focus liveview, no smears?
Pages: 1

tamron 17-50 vc and nikon d90 vs nikon d7000

info@www.about-digital-photo.com