Choice, Samsung EX1 vs Samsung NX100 vs Olumpus E-PL1 vs Samsung NX11

Pages: 1

20.07.2011 1:16:00
I live in the region, so that all feel and choose not possible (

Reviewed bunch of reviews.
read a bunch of reviews.

At most an old Canon A520. But began to fail. It is time to replace
primarily needed for baby pictures. He was already 2 months)
So autofocus should be on top. T. to. Shoot while indoors, the matrix need better. The second
gulyankidacha and more. And only a third prirodarybalkales. Budget
small reflex disappear (Bu is not considered).
Just do not need large, are advanced and soap dishes nezerkalki with interchangeable lens.

Video is not critical.

shall describe their choice
1) Samsung Ex1 Price 10-11k. We should all 15! Advanced
soap dish with a good matrix.
Swivel Screen.
We have, fingered. Liked.

analogs are more expensive, so consider not.

2) Samsung NX100 or Olympus Pen E-PL1 Kit (12-13k)
Both feel I can not. We do not have in stock.
On reviews and reviews are not bad. In
Kit-e lenses are good, although write reviews in Samsunga better without stub.
have Olika stub in the body.

interchangeable lenses. But there's no flash and viewfinder.
Samsung newer, better matrix and not AMOLED screen fades in the sun (which is important, ie. To. The viewfinder is not).

3) Samsung NX11, analogues of other firms outside the budget

You could say the same NX100 only with flash (sorry does not turn up at the ceiling) and the viewfinder. There are two
Kita
C usual 18-55 mm (15 + k), much larger nx100
pancake with high-aperture 20 mm (16 to 5+, beyond the budget), it can be worn in a tiny pocket of the jacket

On the other hand then you can buy extra. lenses as well as 100 to 11

C 18-55 mm we have in the presence of 18K.
feel, very much, although the lens too big for me.

Primarily compare 1) and 3) Options
With his wife discussed everything, she insists on 1) its argument why pay more if the difference is not very big.
I'm trying to convince her that the quality and high speed and you can pay.

It turns out that it is possible to compromise and take the average.
But confusing lack of flash. The wife does not understand how you can take pictures without a flash in the dark. (What is hard to explain the luminosity girls))

I ask your advice. Alas, 2) but to see the video review in any way.
from 3) can not compare a pancake and a normal lens

'll Buy through an Internet shop, t. To. Our prices bite.

Forgot to add that in the photo almost full 0)
 

20.07.2011 9:01:00

But there's no flash and viewfinder.
have Olika outbreak there. And be able to purchase both optical and electronic viewfinder, if it is impossible to live without them.

20.07.2011 11:02:00
At the NX11 has a panorama mode with a single click - for me this is important and I do not know that the weightier - panorama or color and smaller size at Olympus.

20.07.2011 11:55:00

wife looks at the root - for 2 and 3-shalabushki you lenses. . . start buying

20.07.2011 18:13:00
http: // market. yandex. ru / compare. xml? hid = 91148 & amp; CA ... 6, 6912410, 6412953

NX11 little too big

remain for 12-13 thousand.:
1) NX100 without flash, but it is better matrix screen and flash separately
worth 4. 5k and quite large.
2) Pen E-PL1, there is an outbreak, but worse
matrix tft screen is not always clearly visible

20.07.2011 18:37:00

NX100 without flash, but it is better and matrix screen

screen better matrix - no. Matrix in Samsa larger, but not better characteristics. Take Sams has meaning only "for growth", in the hope that in the next generation of carcasses Sams deliver good modern matrix old carcass you someone to sell to, and dialed Park lenses will juzat new.
Now Olympus Samsa better in almost every way. And if you really want it Bastard crop, it is best to pay attention to Sony Nexia, where the matrix is ​​really good, much better and Samsa, and Olympus / Panasonic.

20.07.2011 18:58:00
IMHO NX100 no flash, no stub, and with a dark lens, despite the large matrix will pass where you can shoot at the EX-1.

Olik in this regard will be more interesting.

20.07.2011 19:29:00
Yes
until even and no plans to buy more extra.
Sony lens does not fit into the budget and I did not like.



Once all read and compared)

Now I want Olik.
only thing that confuses, this is the worst and slower autofocus compared to samsung-m

+ question

We have in stock Olympus Pen E-P1 Kit, if you see it, is not much different kind of model?
The main difference between the body and lens?

I'll go watch it, if you like I will probably take the E-PL1,)


20.07.2011 19:44:00

only thing that confuses, this is the worst and slower autofocus compared to samsung-m

Location information?



[i] We have in stock Olympus Pen E-P1 Kit, if you see it, is not much different kind of model?
The main difference between the body and lens?

I'll go watch it, if you like I will probably take the E-PL1,)


E-P1 abruptly, but there is no built-in flash and autofocus really slower.

20.07.2011 20:08:00
IMHO NX100 no flash, no stub, and with a dark lens, despite the large matrix will pass where you can shoot at the EX-1.

Olik in this regard will be more interesting.


Samsungovsky 20-50mm has no operating system, but (and maybe - because of this) draws well.


Yes until even and have no plans to buy more extra. Lens

Namely, that while - to the NX100 more top 30 - as full-time fix, I can assure you that will block most of the needs. Yet, it is necessary to take into account that buying f / Capability and with the use of interchangeable lens, it is necessary to focus on the camera with a smaller crop factor - please get a return in the form of, for example, the beautiful "bokeh" and so on. D.. Olik, in terms of buying additional lenses would probably be more expensive.

20.07.2011 21:17:00

at the camera with a smaller crop factor - please get a return in the form of, for example, the beautiful "bokeh"

bokeh - a double edged sword. For tourist photos (typical story - a man on a background dostprimechatelnosti and sharp should be and then, and more) blur the background - hemorrhoids and headache at the same time. Here the best small crop on the same luminosity will be sharper, or at the same field you can put a large aperture and shutter speed is less, reducing the chance of blurring.
shoot portraits with a tripod - thank small DOF, travel photo shoot - down with a small depth of field, soap dish all taxied.

20.07.2011 21:38:00

shoot portraits with a tripod - thank small DOF, travel photo shoot - down with a small depth of field, soap dish all taxied.

here and argue about, all right, just think for what it would cost to fix 4/3 50/1. 4 AF (t. E., Native) - the ability to give a small depth of field?
 

20.07.2011 21:48:00


In fact, in this thread people looking for an inexpensive alternative to the compact. And additional optics is not going to buy.

NX100 on the background of e-pl1 in this plan looks very pale.


Well, if you really think about the depth of field, portrait, bokeh, it is necessary to take SLR - optics will be much easier. That's what the portraits on the NX shoot? Portretnik of, like, the only one announced and the $ 999 in the US.

20.07.2011 22:03:00

From portretnik, like, only one announced and the $ 999 in the US.

And this size.

20.07.2011 22:11:00


NX100 on the background of e-pl1 in this plan looks very pale.

I'm looking at the pictures with Olika somehow do not feel its "brightness". And though people looking for a cheap alternative to the compact. And additional optics is not going to buy the ability to change the optics will be interesting to experiment, unless, of course, f / and not bought, as a piece of furniture.

20.07.2011 22:11:00

And this size.


Well, 85/1. 4, the compact can not be physically

20.07.2011 22:24:00
85/1. 4 compact can not be physically

same portretnik for FF, even for one and a half too big Kropa EGF. . .

20.07.2011 22:57:00

same portretnik for FF, even for one and a half too big Kropa EGF. . .

Just do something 85mm - this is just a crop portretnik 1, 5. FF classic portrait lens - 135mm:
Canon EF 135mm f / 2 L USM
Nikkor AF 135mm f / 2 D DC
Zeiss Sonnar T * 135mm f / 1. 8 ZA (Sony SAL-135F18Z)


That is, if we are talking about facial portraits

20.07.2011 23:00:00
quote:
:
Just do something 85mm - this is just a crop portretnik 1, 5. FF classic portrait lens - 135mm:
Canon EF 135mm f / 2 L USM
Nikkor AF 135mm f / 2 D DC
Zeiss Sonnar T * 135mm f / 1. 8 ZA (Sony SAL-135F18Z)

A type 85L - it's stupid moderate telephoto?
Rahitekturnye details Sima and dogs?

quote:
:
Well, 85/1. 4 compact can not be physically

Check it out yet announced poltosu at Nex. Size delivers.

20.07.2011 23:24:00

A type 85L - it's stupid moderate telephoto?
Rahitekturnye details Sima and dogs?


portraits are not only facial.

classic focal length for the full frame:
Rostova portrait - about 50 mm
or Bust waist - about 85 mm
Face portrait - about 135 mm

Moreover, 135mm and growth can be removed if you move away, and 50mm front not snimesh - izuroduesh person.


Check it out yet announced poltosu at Nex. Size delivers.

Yes, the size of the optics of the Nex depressing

22.08.2011 2:07:00
Tell me, what countries are doing olympus E-pl1? ?

22.08.2011 12:30:00
http: // yablor. ru / blogs / nebolshoy-test-samsung-nx100 / 1083620
here's a good review for Samsung. . . the same text links to tests nex5 and PEN e-pl1. . . Realistically, shown in the cameras, ie. E., That it is possible to do with them straight arms. . .
 

25.08.2011 1:09:00
Take the NX11 and do not worry about size, it is - the best of the above. Not only because less analogues, but by itself, due to the sensitive quality matrices first. And Panorama successful obtained personally seen from a friend, but he was not a pro.
Pages: 1

Choice, Samsung EX1 vs Samsung NX100 vs Olumpus E-PL1 vs Samsung NX11

info@www.about-digital-photo.com