Canon EOS 5D Mark II (Part 4)


29.01.2011 14:11:00
(This is a continuation of the previous topics)
 

29.01.2011 14:11:00
70mm studio? Not a lot of it? For a portrait, I can understand, but if growth well, or something a little wider. For such a small room and does not need a little time
35mm I think the fix does not hurt. Or zooms without problems go?

29.01.2011 16:58:00


examples I have in my album

29.01.2011 19:14:00

For 70mm studio? Not a lot of it? For a portrait, I can understand, but if growth well, or something a little wider.

Normally, if a full frame. Although again "studio" are different. Someone in the kitchen studio 3 * 3.


35mm I think the fix does not hurt. Or zooms without problems go?

standard background 2. 7 meters with 35mm or close to the background removed or it will pull in the frame nonsense. In general, it is the same works for me. But the Running 50-90mm.




I 1. 2 recently filmed. Nothing special to synchronize did. In general, problems with the diaphragm zero. Problems with the plane shutter to shutter speed is yes - happen.

29.01.2011 20:28:00
Well then, in principle, I think my 24-70 should be quite enough. Here
think of fixes to purchase.

29.01.2011 23:27:00

I 1. 2 recently filmed. Nothing special to synchronize did.

I meant sync at speeds above 1 / 200-1 / 250 - something that many people use in the studio to studio standard pulsed light. When
ISO 100 and hole p2, 8 (not to mention F1, 2) if you do not synchronize the camera at 1/500 and shorter, even at 1/32 power 300Dzh puff (and in some outbreaks, Cho cheaper moscha happens adjusted only to 1/16) will be overexposure.

natural solutions to this issue exist: but all require knowledge and money!


And what did you have problems with short gate? ? ? ?

29.01.2011 23:47:00

Here I think that because of fixes to purchase.
135/2. 0 Although if only studio - this lens will be mainly for the shoulder portrait. Over time, these will shoulder 24-70 is not even dream.

29.01.2011 23:48:00

Well then, in principle, I think my 24-70 should be quite enough.

enough of course. Buy him portretnik if nothing else there is no suitable.



And what did you have problems with short gate? ? ? ?

Same as everyone else - can be seen darkening of the lower edge of the frame shutter curtain. On the central locking systems, this effect is expressed as vignettes and occurs much later. A slotted so that's rubbish.



At ISO 100 and hole p2, 8 (not to mention F1, 2) if you do not synchronize the camera at 1/500 and shorter, even at 1/32 power 300Dzh puff (and in some outbreaks, cho cheaper moscha is regulated only to 1/16) will be overexposure.

Well either buy lamps with more depth adjustment. Koreans some 1 \\ 128 promised. ND filters or dress, or put the light so that would not have shone with all the dope. Cell to contribute to this very nozzles - I specifically rented by 1. 2 like a very soft image, and light a great software with cells. Foty turned on the fan, but it is interesting.

30.01.2011 0:20:00

buy him portretnik if nothing else there is no suitable.
And what would be advised to and usability of various events was that? 85 135 taxis or even so .

30.01.2011 13:00:00
Well
or buy lamps with more depth adjustment. Koreans some 1 \\ 128 promised. ND filters or dress, or put the light so that would not have shone with all the dope.

Appears go conventional, habitual ways - not always applicable and not always comfortable for the photographer!

You will not believe - but there is still a "magic way" to have up to 1 / 8000S without darkening of the frame!
After purchasing this device I can with the usual studinoy pyhoy have here is
http: // fotkidepo. ru /? id = photo: 564667
not applying NDfiltrov without fear blinds in the frame and exposing any open hole.
(to make it clear - in the frame beads flew down in free fall)

example here portraits of F2, 8:
http: // www. photodom. com / photo / 2040220
http: // www. photodom. com / photo / 2045076
specifically shows one "light" other "shadow" - in order to demonstrate the features of the "game open"!

How do you?

30.01.2011 21:17:00

After purchasing this device I can with the usual studinoy pyhoy have here is

And what model of "normal studio pyhi" and how it was connected to a pixel?

30.01.2011 23:34:00

yes it's all I've read a hundred times - for zastavkine chew it thoroughly. here to discuss it clearly off topic. One is certain - there is not no miracle, and it works only with devices that have very long pulse - for micropower sometimes do, to freeze the motion is ill-suited t. To. Very power falls.

specifically shows one "light" other "shadow" - in order to demonstrate the features of the "game open"!

Vadim was not seen anything. 2. there may be 8 and 11 may not understand. Probably print seen something, but fotodomovskoy picture can not see anything.

How do you?
blue thing like - whatever hole I can not see.



85 135 taxis or even so

135 I have no business mainly lies. sometimes at weddings posing shoot them all. in the studio on 99. 99 is not claimed. But I have a 85 \\ 1. 2, there are 90 \\ mc 2. 8 when it was not - roasted on 135 just like that.

31.01.2011 1:58:00

yes it's all I've read a hundred times - for zastavkine it thoroughly chewed

Yes, yes, yes! Exactly there. . . in general, I was there one of the "chewing"!
moscha course sneaks, but freeze Motion still easy, especially if you have:
a) does not blaze 300 J and 600 J.
b) not shoot 5, 6-8, 0 and somewhere in the 2, 8 -3, 2
c) to raise up to ISO 400-1000 (and our Pyadvak it easily allows)
and - voila: Flight of the Bumblebee on 1/8000 with your service!

The pictures (of course uzhaty the dimensions fotodoma) certainly seen weaker, but even there is a noticeable drop in sharpness to the ears of the model (this is the "blue pieces"), and so do polnorazmere gorgeous seen: unit and eyes the model of field, and soup, soup is not already floating detski!



And what model of "normal studio pyhi" and how it was connected to a pixel?

long to paint - that you can credit:
http: // www. zastavkin. com / forum / viewtopic. php? f = 19 & am ... 8fb7abd6f531596cc
there is not a lot of pages - not too lazy to read all (there I like here - Vadim V)

31.01.2011 5:44:00

not applying NDfiltrov
And what evil these filters? I Genus works with a bang. http: // www. genustech. tv / filters / genus-nd-fader-filter-77mm. html

31.01.2011 12:11:00

And what evil these filters?

if nothing ever!
Moreover, they are indispensable when a bright day it is necessary to lengthen the shutter speed. . . well, such as removing the flowing water, and so on. n.

Then it was just about the studio, pulsed light and shortening the exposure. . .

31.01.2011 13:39:00

Yes, yes, yes! Exactly there. . . in general, I was there one of the "chewing"!

Sasha lambskin is the way with regards to Hensel and canons before pixel invented.


and soup, soup is not already floating detski!
I believe.

But vebrazmere many photos look different.

way polyarik worth much cheaper pixel, and I have it already. A ND even cheaper. Yes, and without them I 1. 2 shot, though the scheme has been specifically. A pixels and poketvizardy buy yet do not want to. Given that I do not much they need, IMHO pixels buggy and buggy with Pocket 580 II - Wait until.




And what evil these filters?

Like any filters they do not like the backlight. Even the most expensive can give ghosting glare in the frame and drop the contrast. In the viewfinder can be seen much worse respectively, plus autofocus can zaglyuchit - the last true for cheap devices for which the pilot is weak, and the divider for power is not deep.

for outdoor shooting with a bright sun essential first two points - the way they are usually directly linked to the price of optics and filter.

01.02.2011 13:48:00

to long to paint - that you can credit

read - a useful discussion. On the PocketWizard Utility can be adjusted via the ignition point for such "non-standard" cases, but better (only more expensive) to their specialized ST4 compatible flash units for FSS (unfortunately, very few models supported), and the controller AC3, very convenient if you need to.

01.02.2011 23:13:00

but better (only more expensive)

This is the key hitch! much more expensive!

02.02.2011 1:00:00

Sorry, after reading At 1/250 - camera includes HSS , whinnying and further reading I could not. I'll have to read at your leisure, the main thing again on this site does not stumble

you intrigued me: "You would not believe - but there is still a" magic way "to have up to 1 / 8000S without darkening of the frame! After purchasing this device I can usual studinoy pyhoy have here is a "

02.02.2011 9:49:00
With
dnyuhoy!

02.02.2011 9:51:00
quote:
:
With dnyuhoy!

Thank you!


Vadim! Let's continue the discussion in a thread of light Flash for DSLR Canon independently while we were not "glued" forcibly


02.02.2011 11:30:00

Sorry, after reading at 1/250 - camera includes HSS, whinnying and further reading I could not.

It quoted my words?
I do not remember to be honest, but. . . .
Do not apologize, I'm glad that you cheered up!

I really do not quite understand where I wrote "gaffe", but if you think so - znachitsa the way it was.

You see - I'm not an engineer by cameras and could incorrectly describe the process, but the essence remains the same: to 5dM2 mode "M" after having set the shutter speed 1 / 250s (and shorter) icon at lightning lit letter "H" - Mode High Speed ​​Sinhro. . . . (You remember that the usual instructions of synchronization in NP carried out to 1 / 200c inclusive) and who is it there cut in - camera or not - that's you decide for yourself!

02.02.2011 12:00:00
See
. Post above

02.02.2011 13:19:00
Prompt, who knows why
format 480p H. 264 on this camera (and maybe not just on it) is so cumbersome?
size of each frame of a video stream to 7 times smaller. in file size is only 2 times.
how so?

03.02.2011 11:46:00
otmetilsa

03.02.2011 13:02:00

I'd like to send to the docks.
As far as I remember, it is almost too tight.
 

03.02.2011 13:59:00
quote:
:

I'd like to send to the docks.
As far as I remember, it is almost too tight.
sorry. means amazing fig format selected. compression, presumably, the processor can not handle.

upd:
reached the docks. http: // h264encoder. com /
"# For a frame size of 1920 x 1080 (full high definition), choose a data rate of 7, 000-8, 000 Kbps.
# For a frame size of 640 x 480 (standard definition), choose a data rate of 1, 000-2, 000 Kbps. "
t. e difference should be 4-8 times. and it turns out just 2.
this is especially kanonovskoy implementation!

curiosity I pinch the first in your avi 11ti-minute video, then back to h264 (mp4).
difference is 16 times! was almost 2GB, was 114mb.

t. H, I think, especially the codec has nothing to do with it.

03.02.2011 17:43:00
people waiting for RAW-video and here. . .

03.02.2011 18:29:00


quote:
For a frame size of 1920 x 1080 (full high definition), choose a data rate of 7, 000-8, 000 Kbps.

7000-8000 - is the level of SD video from the DVD, to "full high definition" here very long breaststroke. . .

03.02.2011 18:37:00
Now look
movie with pyadvaka ~ 47000 kbit per second.

03.02.2011 19:40:00
quote:
:
7000-8000 - is the level of SD video from the DVD, to "full high definition" here very long breaststroke. . .
it, if I understand correctly, not uzhaty level. there's something about it pressed down.

upd:
checked by pinching 19ti-second spot in 1080p. was 110mb, became 16MB

04.02.2011 8:07:00

Try to go to the rear: why in 1080 at almost 7 times higher resolution image, the size of the video file only 2 times more than 480p.
The most likely answer is: the hardware can not handle the b of lshim bitrate.
But in fact here: Canon 5D Mark II as a camcorder. . .

04.02.2011 9:33:00

On the other hand, the fact that less reaped easier to work.
When I have to shoot the video (no matter what), always choose the highest resolution and best quality. Resize - last.

04.02.2011 9:34:00
quote:
:
Try to go to the rear: why in 1080 at almost 7 times higher resolution image, the size of the video file only 2 times more than 480p.
The most likely answer is: the hardware can not handle the b of lshim bitrate.
But in fact here: Canon 5D Mark II as a camcorder. . .

hehe, yes, the right question. see here is not in the hardware, and the reluctance of poking around with a video at a lower resolution. crooked implemented.

05.02.2011 13:13:00
quote ():
crooked implemented.
There are a huge number of devices in which compression is implemented smoothly: compact, mobile phones, webcams. . .

05.02.2011 14:12:00
quote:
:
quote ():
crooked implemented.
There are a huge number of devices in which compression is implemented smoothly: compact, mobile phones, webcams. . .
if this is sarcasm, it is not consistent. Obviously, this fact is not in favor of a nickle.
if not, well, so what? from the series "in Apples and uncle in Kiev"

05.02.2011 15:32:00
Video Features a subject largely used for other tasks, for which (as stated above) RAW format is more suitable.
T. h. It is rather a series of "crooked implemented Microscope - for nailing did not fit."

07.02.2011 10:11:00

crooked implemented microscope company Intel.


Video in dimes honed to maximum - fulHD, diabetes well remove all the previous camera. You may ask why he does not know how C-VHS! . .

07.02.2011 11:23:00
quote:
:
"crooked implemented Microscope - for nailing completely adapted"
wonder why this microscope attached a pen and boyok?
probably for the best optical quality.

07.02.2011 11:38:00

Again, it is possible and a sledgehammer to hammer small cloves, if podnapryachsya. But the main use of it - more!

07.02.2011 13:36:00
hello!
Strongly do not beat for the question - is it worth to change 7D 5D mark II? For me, the main priority in the photo - its quality. Sports and ballroom dancing is not rented. Heard about the fact that autofocus is slower Pyadvake Semyon. So whether it is significantly -can who compared the two cameras. Or, again, it is not necessary to compare the two cameras at different levels: Crop and FF?

07.02.2011 14:23:00
quote ():
Again
In my opinion it is futile.


At 7d there is one distinct advantage - frequency clatter shutter.

07.02.2011 15:00:00
quote:
:
quote ():
Again
In my opinion it is futile.


At 7d there is one distinct advantage - frequency clatter shutter.

frequency clatter need again for filming action scenes. . . Has anyone from the owners 5dII would like to shove on the 7d?

And then there are some undeniable advantages in 7D except for the frequency of the shutter?


07.02.2011 17:56:00
quote:
:

. . . Has anyone from the owners 5dII would like to shove on the 7d?
I - nothing.
And when elected, amateur CROP did not even consider.

quote:
And then there are some undeniable advantages in 7D except for the frequency of the shutter?
Easier.
Wireless control external flash already in the chamber.
Faster AF.
Newer matrix, but eliminates the crop. . .

07.02.2011 20:03:00
ttp: // forum. ixbt. com /? id = rules # main. 4. 12. 4

07.02.2011 20:16:00

At 7d there is one distinct advantage - frequency clatter shutter.

not well. the main thing is of course the price.

07.02.2011 20:21:00

Why change now seven in the second mark, may be released in the fall 5DM3 with autofocus and seven from other stray more so now than have to shoot

07.02.2011 20:53:00
quote:
:

Why change now seven in the second mark, may be released in the fall 5DM3 with autofocus and seven from other stray more so now than have to shoot

not it "may come" and "autumn". . . . and at 100 tyrov for carcass with such and such parameters. . . .
Eh. . Still, this is not achievable FF to it. . . .

07.02.2011 22:20:00

Well, then you can sell some m-are taking on the commission, add and take ff
 

07.02.2011 22:35:00

Easier.
leveler pen with two batteries and some 70-200 / 2. 8

Wireless control of external flash in the camera
Then it is the presence of built-pyshechki.

Faster AF
How much? Someone spent measurements? ? ?


important thing is of course the price
is yes.
"If I had five rubles yesterday, I have today and not three..."

Canon EOS 5D Mark II (Part 4)

info@www.about-digital-photo.com