Help me choose a camera from this list (5 models)

Pages: 1

21.12.2010 10:39:00
re-read a bunch of descriptions eventually stopped here on these models:
Nikon D 3000 Kit AF
Nikon P100
Pentax Optio X 90
Olympus E-450 Kit
Nikon Coolpix L100
Which is better to buy these? For SLR then you have to buy a bunch of bells and whistles, and nezerkalki more convenient to carry with you everywhere. Generally fotik need for universal purposes (on vacation, landscapes shoot, family / friends, and in the dark to an acceptable quality images were)
Please help me decide
 

21.12.2010 10:42:00


And here and there is nothing to be determined. The best is the D3000 kit (with VR - stub). No bells and whistles to it is not necessary, except for the card. But the card all need to buy.

21.12.2010 10:54:00

that would not start holivar - buy one machine that looks like you.
This is the best choice.

21.12.2010 11:09:00

For SLR then you have to buy a bunch of bells and whistles
This is not "necessary", but simply can)) for a substantial expansion of opportunities that you probably do not burn.
If you absolutely everywhere - then take a light most of the shoot cameras. Soap dishes at reasonable Canon. In your budget S90-95 is quite amiss.
And with "acceptable quality in the dark" to cope unless the carcass of 1 kg and 5 kilobaksov, and then conditionally, for lack of a better)

21.12.2010 12:59:00

For SLR then you have to buy a bunch of bells and whistles
Which of the bells and whistles you're going to buy a whole bunch? Seems to me that you just been listening to non-professional opinions. Voted for the Nikon D3000, because of the proposed is the best choice for universal purposes (on vacation, landscapes shoot, family / friends, and in the dark to an acceptable quality images were)

21.12.2010 13:13:00
Also connected to the common opinion about the Nikon D3000 kit (with VR - stub) - definitely the best optical quality (especially in the dark to acceptable quality images were ). If the size of the final priority over quality photos - then the same Canon S90-95

21.12.2010 13:24:00

the functional benefits P100.

21.12.2010 13:31:00

main "bells and whistles" to SLR photography books will be! And then interchangeable lenses. flash. Other not cheap stuff. Type
cool to click on the SLR! But the pictures in the green zone - lohovstvo. To do this, soap dishes and advanced enough.
If you want to take pictures, it is best to start with reading and SLR with a whale. And if to click, you need a soap dish, a suitable color to clothes and get into the clutch.
camera with interchangeable lenses never suitable for the role of wagon, wagon rather P100 with its zoom and video, but also krupnovat. Pentax X90 is almost the same egg. only in the profile.

quote:
:

the functional benefits P100.

Type "most versatile"

quote:
:
If the override final quality photos - then the same Canon S90-95
This clutch and fit and a picture (in reasonable aisles) please

21.12.2010 15:50:00
quote:
:
general fotik need for universal purposes. . .
Nikon P100 - on the quality of the photos is comparable to entry-level SLR - functionality and possibilities of use - significantly surpasses them!

21.12.2010 20:32:00

For me this is one of the most complex issues. For myself, it is difficult to make a choice, let alone for a stranger. . . To me several times turned to the same question, I answered a question with a question: do you have small children? Do you want to earn (earn) in the photo? You often have a rest (to hunt, catch fish) in picturesque places? You love to "spy" on the streets? Or all at once, and more? You have a lot of money on the camera? Do you have a computer? and so on. d.
In fact, maybe you have a sense to buy an inexpensive tsifromylnitsu and try to start it?

21.12.2010 20:46:00

Nikon P100 - on the quality of the photos is comparable to entry-level SLR
's really a controversial statement! After viewing the photos with this machine I got the exact opposite IMHO.

21.12.2010 20:47:00
quote:
:
Nikon P100 - on the quality of the photos is comparable to entry-level SLR
"To the bride and the mare."

21.12.2010 21:34:00


Pixels go and looked again.

21.12.2010 21:53:00

Nikon soap dishes do not take, Nikon does only good reflex and then with stabilizer rare because it is for him a license for that you post stabilizer for extra money than other brands, so Nikon tries somewhere something to cut for the sake of competition stabilizer.
Personal stabilizers have to segodyan Sony (2nd and pieces from your Minolta) Sonya in this plan wins SLR, t. To. By Minolta stub most still the best. because you can use any lens already, Kenon- it generally makes TRAC and the first-born in this matter but the truth is if SLR, all lenses with a stub. And it is money well and Panas, the general BEETLE 15 years it has managed to cram in a special unit and now it throws any technique as 2nd cent.

Olympus also does not have a stub, but t. To. They are friends with Panas then it makes allowances for Leica lenses from Stabiae.

Pentax as well as Nikon.


21.12.2010 22:11:00
So what? From voiced d3000 still ahead by a wide margin.

21.12.2010 22:25:00

Olympus also does not have a stub
In E-5xx stabilizer in the carcass.


When people from China will grow or want other focus, so it will be in full separation due to non-motorized lenses.
 

21.12.2010 22:38:00

-----------
In E-5xx stabilizer in the carcass.
-----------
remember they're something mutili the similarity Minolta, shaking off the dust from the matrix neuzh it has managed to collect on this matter stub?

Please refresh your memory ttp: // forum. ixbt. com /? id = rules # main. 4. 13

21.12.2010 22:42:00
Hello everyone, I personally would have voted for a couple of Canon S90 (95) + nikon D3 (1) 000, well, compact DSLR against it is even so the author to solve

21.12.2010 22:50:00
quote:
:
Hello, personally I would have voted for a couple of Canon S90 (95) + nikon D3 (1) 000, well, compact DSLR against it is even so the author to decide

- canon is not in the select list. If the list is not to limit, the other options can be added.

21.12.2010 22:52:00

In E-4xx no stub. This is just one of the contenders. And the price on the optics bites.

21.12.2010 22:55:00

So the stub in the E-5 or purchase them?

21.12.2010 23:06:00
quote:
:
Nikon P100 - on the quality of the photos is comparable to entry-level SLR - functionality and possibilities of use - significantly surpasses them!

And how is superior features and capabilities?

PS. Let me guess - you do the owner of P100, huh?

21.12.2010 23:24:00

---------
Nikon P100 - on the quality of the photos is comparable to entry-level SLR - functionality and possibilities of use - significantly surpasses them!
----------
remembered me that Nikon had not considered making a soap dish that they should serve the people, and therefore he never mode manual focus was not on the scale in meters and t. To. Nikon is not Auto Focus does in the dark, the user generally turns chode who took this miracle machine into the darkness. . It would at least on the LCD can be as on the film vystvit scale in meters to the subject and to click, annnet, Nikon ever for the people did not think users buying soap dish. . .
But maybe I'm too carp to Nikon, but the topic was going to live and where to shoot continuously white nights?


21.12.2010 23:36:00

Stab in the carcass of their own.


And how is superior features and capabilities?
Continuous shooting, video recording. . .

By the way, I also did not like the Nikon because of the lack of opportunities to see the manic exposure parameters in the soap dish.


21.12.2010 23:48:00
quote:
:
Continuous shooting, video recording. . .

How many frames per second makes the P100 in the ro-format? What is the difference from the movie of the same Nikon 3100? - Not counting the video with some 35/1. 8 will be a lot more interesting than mylnichnogo proboscis.

22.12.2010 10:03:00
quote:
:
. . . and so on. To. Nikon does the Auto Focus in the dark. . .

P100 does!

quote:
:
What is the difference from the movie of the same Nikon 3100?
3100 First on the list is no counterpart. . . , and one that in the video list do not write

22.12.2010 10:16:00
In
equal Nikon P100 does nothing, and dzhipeg - 10 frames per second. And the video with 30 frames per second will look better than 24th.

22.12.2010 23:12:00
quote:
:
th 3100 is not listed

So easy to add.

quote:
and one that in the video list do not write

So what? Well, do not write, okay, the main thing - photo makes it much better.

quote:
:
in equal Nikon P100 does nothing

e. 3 frames per second with the SLR will be at all out of competition.

quote:
Yes and video with 30 frames per second will look better than 24th.

Oh not the fact that there is and where it will be better.

22.12.2010 23:50:00

Oh not the fact that there is and where it will be better.
autofocus in video zoom is also available? And more than 400 millimeters are too.

23.12.2010 0:22:00
quote:
:
autofocus in video zoom is also available?

No, not there. But a lot of pictures, a lot better. But it's the little things on the background of the AF in the video, right?

quote:
Yes, and more than 400 millimeters are too.

Screw some 12-24 - where there will be a P100? Screw 100-400 (eq. 150-600) - where there will be a p100?

In general, to arrange the next version of "tsifromylo Versus reflex" no desire. . . Have a desire to play the pipe in the same tune with the owner of p100, which is nothing okromya carrots thereof p100 never tasted, but good advice to give reasoned ready - yes on health.
 

23.12.2010 1:10:00

Also no desire to enter into a confrontation.
Pages: 1

Help me choose a camera from this list (5 models)

info@www.about-digital-photo.com