Canon EOS 550D / Rebel T2i / Kiss X4 Digital

 

08.02.2010 17:24:00
Briefly:
* 18 Mpix APS-C CMOS
* ISO 100-6400, s / w 12800
* DIGIC 4
* 3. 7fps
* Full HD movie recording with manual control and selectable frame rates
* 7. 7cm (3 . 0 ") 3: 2 Clear View LCD with 1, 040k dots
* iFCL metering System with 63-zone Dual-layer Metering Sensor
* Quick Control screen to change shooting settings
* Exposure compensation +/- 5 stops (must be the same , ± 2EV barrier is breached)
* Select maximum value for Auto ISO
* External Microphone socket
* Movie crop function
* Eye-Fi connected functions compatibility

here - http: // www. dpreview. com / news / 1002 / 10020806canoneos550d. asp

Names:
• US: Canon Rebel T2i
• Japan: Canon EOS Kiss Digital X4
• Elsewhere: Canon EOS 550D

Yes, new battery LP-E8 (and a new battery grip, too).

SDXC memory cards.

Video Modes:
• 1920 x 1080 (1080P, 16: 9) @ 30/25/24 fps
• 1280 x 720 (720P, 16: 9) @ 60/50 fps
• 640 x 480 (4: 3) @ 60/50 fps
• Quicktime MOV format (H. 264 video, linear PCM audio)
• Up to 29 min 59 sec (or max file size 4 GB)

sRAW not.

Autofocus seem the same.

Bracket everything just three frames to ± 2EV.

Shutter seem the same.

Viewfinder seem the same.

add a dedicated button Live View / video.


08.02.2010 17:59:00
I think that 18 Mpix APS-C - never ice ((((

on FF more rules, but at 1, 6, IMHO, is soap.

08.02.2010 18:08:00
Well, Che said. . . I congratulate kEnonistov with melkopikselnostyu. Olik on melkopikselyu already overtaken, left to catch up with the soap dish, and Canon will open its new direction - zerkalomylnitsy. . . Where there m4 / 3 to Canon. . .
What is now a strong case in Kenonistov? "And we have more than all the pixels!"

08.02.2010 18:25:00
Judging by the fact that the noise with increasing magnetic field is practically not increased (see. 7D) - let them be .

08.02.2010 18:26:00
quote:
:
Well, Che said. . . I congratulate kEnonistov with melkopikselnostyu. Olik on melkopikselyu already overtaken
envious?
actually have not surpassed, at 4/3 the density of pixels a little more.
If the matrix of seven, it's good, nazhoristye 18 megapixels.

Metering of seven. Okay.
buffer capacity does not seem to increase - less than the length of the series. Bad.
new pen - why?

quote:
:
I think 18 Mpix APS-C - never ice ((((

on FF more rules, but at 1, 6, IMHO, is soap.
It's time to wean considered 100% .

08.02.2010 18:29:00

new pen - why?

new battery. For more detailed indication chetyrёhsegmentnoy charge.

08.02.2010 18:39:00
As a result, obscure, on what niche will be designed 60D, if the new 550D looks like a lightweight version of "Seven".

08.02.2010 19:13:00
Wow, canon once again demonstrated who is who. Hats off.


new battery. For more detailed indication chetyrёhsegmentnoy charge.
This is sabotage, of course - with each new carcass change the form factor, again, can afford and like only in the initial segment.

08.02.2010 19:18:00
Another
500D = 7 mm 4. E-520 Olympus caught up 4. 7 mm, but right now uzho distilled. Success in developing and quickly cross the Rubicon in 20mPukseley. . .

It's time to wean considered 100%
Similarly, privintivno ban (under threat of life... Canon wearing around his neck) view more than 33%. . .

08.02.2010 19:43:00

usual product photography - image. Imprint, output to a monitor or screen through a projector. Should compare images at the same scale, the scale of the so-called 100% viewing depends on the number of pixels per line.

Some details and compare the extent of 100% image viewing converted "1 sensel 1 pixel" with 10 and 15 cm megasenselnyh sensors. Here - Canon 40d or 50d to change that 400d, # 29

08.02.2010 19:48:00

buffer capacity does not seem to increase - less than the length of the series. Bad.
Something I missed it, do not tell me the length of the Old Series?

08.02.2010 19:52:00

Something I missed it, do not tell me the length of the Old Series?
• 34 JPEG / Fine frames
• 6 RAW frames

08.02.2010 20:02:00
quote:
:

Another 500D = 7 mm 4. E-520 4. 7 mm caught up with Olympus, but right now uzho distilled. Success in developing and quickly cross the Rubicon in 20mPukseley. . .
[. . . ]
Oli: 12 3/1. 73/1. 3 = 5. 47 Mn / cm 2 ,
Ken: 18/2. 23/1. 49 = 5. 42 Mn / cm 2 .
quote:
It's time to wean considered 100%
Similarly, privintivno ban (under threat of life... Canon wearing around his neck) view more than 33%. . .
No, well, if one has a monitor 18 megapixel, all bets are possible and 100% .

08.02.2010 20:08:00
• 34 JPEG / Fine frames
• 6 RAW frames

thanks, and from this information? In an official press release not have it. All
found on the official. site in the description.

08.02.2010 20:11:00

well, if one has a monitor 18 megapixel, all bets are possible and 100%
Manufacturers matrices monitors nervously smoking, knowing that for the needs fotoonanistov photographers they have just not keep up.

On a subject, a system focusing noticed. Remains of the old? So 7D and 60D will still be significantly countered 550D.

08.02.2010 20:11:00

Information is the link from the first post.

08.02.2010 20:19:00

Information is the link from the first post.


"Semen Semenovich.... Aaaaaaa.." (C)

08.02.2010 20:24:00

Oli E-520
10 4/1. 8/1. 35 = 4. 28 Mn / cm2
Oli E-620
12 3/1. 8/1. 35 = 5. 06 Mn / cm2
I hope that does not popret further. . . but then so have to crawl on the Nikon or malopikselnuyu Sonya (well, type 12 megapixels) as the most zhirnopikselnye (though in something conservative).

Canan 7D, 550D:
18/2. 23/1. 49 = 5. 42 Mn / cm2.
We look forward to further growth. . .

Everyone likes to see what you want to see.
I have repeatedly upload photos matrix Olympus and wrote about size. The matrix size 19h13, 5 mm, is used by Rabbi 18h13, 5 mm and 17 3h13mm this crop ZhPEGa chamber. Why is it necessary to ask Olympus. . .

08.02.2010 20:29:00
Well, do not understand why there (amateur) class need 18 MP? ? Write here if you type noises as 7D, then everything is OK. Well, the other parameters that so dramatically stepped progress (DD for example), do not believe. And the fact that the hole on the glass has not much prikroesh, due to diffraction, as a consequence of the small pixel. . . (Th landscape painters do?). Nikon D95 is also preparing like 14 MP. Why the heck is it necessary? ? Only files in the volume of growing and improvements zilch. Home
buy SLR like the people who already have an idea of ​​what they are buying (mostly, I hope), and beautiful = big numbers on a quantity of MP should already scare.
short range kropnutyh DSLRs has reached a dead-end marketing, take the camera down until it is too late, and there is only FF, but soon there will be trouble
Essno, IMHO.


After 15 minutes: what is happening there with soap holders? So people on the film back. . . .

08.02.2010 20:36:00

Nikon D95 is also preparing like 14 MP.
IMHO this is normal (not on whales of course), 50D with 15mPiks very good looks, good glasses on pixel by pixel, while the Nikon and the matrix more pixels and less on 1mPiks.
read the review about the 7D, testers expressed a clever idea, it would be in the 7D would 15mPiks top, as well. . . .

08.02.2010 20:45:00
7D I do not understand the situation, in the line * D go to the crop, after a nickle? ? general delirium.

08.02.2010 20:46:00

And that hole in the glass has not much prikroesh
Believe in http: // www. the-digital-picture. com / Reviews / Canon-EOS ... amera-Review. aspx , at 7D relative loss of resolution due to diffraction at the aperture is visible since its value about 6. 8.
And, say, 10D is 11. 8.
And now the question - what, at 7D on the diaphragm 11, 8 effective resolution drops to 6Mp?
I do not think so . . . . 3 times hardly reduced.

IMHO, throw such phrases should clearly understand that no one stops to clamp the diaphragm below the DLA, just starting around that time-resolution lens system camera _NACHINAET_ decrease. But when it decreases further with 18Mp at 7D / 550D to a mere 12MP. . .

08.02.2010 20:49:00

And that hole in the glass has not much prikroesh, due to diffraction, as a consequence of the small pixel. . . (Th landscape painters do?).

Same as before. At the press do not care what there diffraction and noise at a particular pixel fine.

08.02.2010 20:50:00
It remains to wait a similar freak of Nikon DSLRs and Entre Level topic can be closed. R. I. P.

08.02.2010 20:55:00
quote:
:

IMHO, throw such phrases should clearly understand that no one stops to clamp the diaphragm below the DLA, just starting around that time-resolution lens system camera _NACHINAET_ decrease. But when it decreases further with 18Mp at 7D / 550D to a mere 12MP. . .
But if still decreases (and further, the sooner = more in the sense of further stuffing matrix MP-E), then again the question what does it all necessary? ! ? Well, what are the pros of these 18 MP? At least in line Kropa? Stock cropped, in the sense of cutting the frame in the shop?
IMHO, marketing deadlock.
 

08.02.2010 21:01:00
Hmm, have always believed that in the matrix of the 500D 50D. But no.

http: // a. img-dpreview. com / previews / CanonEOS550D / imag ... atsnew / ML-001. jpg

Gapless micro lenses
First touted by Canon on the 50D, the EOS 550D "s sensor has what are effectively gapless micro lenses, which significantly increases the efficiency of each pixel. Click on the thumbnail above to see the EOS 550D compared to the EOS 500D.

08.02.2010 21:01:00

But if still decreases (and further, the sooner = more in the sense of further stuffing matrix MP-E), then again the question what does it all necessary? ! ?
It's very simple - to make the photographs more diaphragm resolution was more.
Well, besides obvious and not necessarily that of the same (and good ) at 550D lenses on the diaphragm 7, 6 drops to 15Mp resolution, like the 50D. It can stay above, although slightly below "passport" 18Mp. Say, 17 - all are winning, is not it?

A win - yes, left Kropa. With his 7D felt fully, especially when you consider that it passed with 10D. Well
and in print format panoramas more too - and then before to all the little details to convey, "stitching" of the frames had to 10D. And now in the non-extreme cases, I hope to get out the middle part of the frame with the 7D , if "Shirikov" enough.

08.02.2010 21:02:00
Please do not make threads of fludilnya. Pofleymit possible in [flame] SONY Alpha System vs. Nikon vs. Canon vs. Pentax vs. Olympus vs. Fuji. Vol. 38

08.02.2010 21:05:00

Yes, like all the decorum and yet noble, and even on the topic, even though I sometimes 7D and knocking out of habit .

08.02.2010 21:14:00

Yes like everything yet grandly and nobly

Chino and noble that remains after the removal of the batch that is not

08.02.2010 21:23:00
quote:
:
* Exposure compensation +/- 5 stops (must be the same, ± 2EV barrier is breached)
* Select maximum value for Auto ISO
* SDXC memory cards.

Well, at Canon in the public sector there was something like a camera for people.
but memory pozhmotilis:
• 6 RAW frames

08.02.2010 21:25:00




Let's try to estimate using the test on what the meaning of the aperture diffraction effects would be so significant that will reduce the resolution to 12 18Mp as competitors. Here
appropriate test, http: // www. the-digital-picture. com / Reviews / ISO-12233 ... p = 0 & amp; APIComp = 7
compare 7D (18Mp) and 450D (12MP) on a good lens, EF 200 / 2L.
In my permission 7D is reduced almost to the level 12MP only to f / 16, and that is not quite up to it comes. So I would rate reduction effective resolution up to 12MP 550D somewhere at f / 18-f / 20 approximately.

similar comparison with the 7D 50D (18 vs. 15Mp) my feeling is given about f / 16 dlya7D that he fell to 15Mp resolution.

08.02.2010 21:29:00
quote:
:
Oli E-620
12 3/1. 8/1. 35 = 5. 06 Mn / cm2
1. On the 8x1. 35 MP there are several more.
Truly "everyone likes to see what he wants to see."

I, for instance, no matter how I look at the title of the topic, the word "Olympus" Well, I can not see. . .

08.02.2010 21:40:00
quote:
:
No, well, if one has a monitor 18 megapixel, all bets are possible and 100% .

In the near future, not only monitors, but also ordinary TV will switch to the new video format 33 megapixel ultra-high-definition UHDTV, and then you were afraid of some 18 megapixels. On the contrary, the picture is already behind in the resolution on the progress in the video!

08.02.2010 21:42:00
Nose smell - Canon has released a new Comercial hit exactly as 5dm2 and 7d. And for those who know how to use it - a small camera №2 (3).

08.02.2010 21:43:00
quote:
:
quote:
:
No, well, if one has a monitor 18 megapixel, all bets are possible and 100% .
In the near future, not only monitors, but also ordinary TV will switch to the new video format 33 megapixel ultra-high-definition UHDTV
"I only wish to live in this beautiful season I do not have neither me nor you."

08.02.2010 21:54:00
quote:
:
Let's try to estimate using the test on what the meaning of the aperture diffraction effects would be so significant that will reduce the resolution to 12 18Mp as competitors.
Why? And indeed all of these tests, math, and so. D., And so on.. All these estimations, fitting. More and more people are beginning to talk about the stupidity of the race MP. And here and there, and over the hill, not on an empty place was born a parameter called DLA? IMHO once SLR and prized big, bold pixel, yes but they were not enough, but there must be a limit, but progress is not in place, but do not think that is such a pace. Only here now marketing taxis. Besides, I do not think a lot of people are starting lineup kakogougodno manufacturer has high-end optics, right? Here I'm talking about the crop, and at the same crap FF will be soon.
other words, I personally see in the race MP more real minuses than some mythical advantages. Everything all forgive me, modernizing, round out on this subject, I am sorry for offtopic.

08.02.2010 21:59:00

sorry for offtopic

No, no, no, it is in any case not offtopic. Megapixel - this is one of the characteristics of the camera, it also needs to be discussed.

Here to discuss here, for example, centrifugation, samples of benthic ciliates gradient methods perkolsorbitola yes progressive hybridization of ribosomal RNA, I would not

08.02.2010 22:00:00
quote:
:
"I only wish to live in this beautiful season I do not have neither me nor you."

I then just hope to see the broadcast of the Olympic Games 2012 in London, which has promised to do in the format UHDTV.

08.02.2010 22:05:00

Why? And indeed all of these tests, math, and so. D., And so on. N.
Clearly, as long as you had hoped that the general arguments about the "loss of resolution" and so on. N. A ride, this phenomenon will interfere . And the facts seem to prove otherwise - just "why all these tests," huh?
So just then, to avoid unfounded allegations.

me personally, these tests are necessary in order to, for example, to choose the Exposure value when shooting - and so was giperfokal and resolution sufficient.

08.02.2010 22:08:00

1. On 8x1. 35 MP there are several more.
E-620 4100h3084 12 6mPiks
Total density is less than the 7D and 550D
12. 6/1. 8/1. 35 = 5. 185 Mpixels / cm2
AAAA. . . Mlyn, guard, from Canon to melkopikselyu lagging behind. . .

08.02.2010 22:24:00
Antiofftopik: quite a logical and traditional development line *** D. Who wants jumps type FF at a price Kropa or all features in a cheap 7D camera - big dreamers .



I then just hope to see the broadcast of the Olympic Games 2012 in London, which has promised to do in the format UHDTV.
on what you are going to watch it then? A TV format with a resolution much? You kind of do not live in Japan, no?

08.02.2010 22:27:00
quote:
:
Antiofftopik: quite a logical and traditional development line *** D. Who wants jumps type FF at a price Kropa or all features in a cheap 7D camera - big dreamers .
Yeah. And for some niche 60D remains.

Like, 60D also promised to declare someone knows something?

08.02.2010 22:36:00

Bracket everything just three frames to ± 2EV.
Wrote just about +/- 5 0 EV: http: // www. dpreview. com / previews / CanonEOS550D

08.02.2010 22:43:00
quote:
:

Bracket everything just three frames to ± 2EV.
Wrote just about +/- 5 0 EV: http: // www. dpreview. com / previews / CanonEOS550D
+/- 5. 0 - no bracketing and exposure compensation (Exposure compensation).
Bracketing (AE Bracketing) that is +/- 2 0.

08.02.2010 22:47:00

Wrote just about +/- 5 0 EV

Compensation metering ± 5EV.

Bracket - three shots to ± 2EV.

That's how it looks in the collection:

upd. There :

quote:
+/- 5. 0 EV compensation
Previous consumer EOS models were criticized for only offering a meager 2 stops exposure compensation either side. The EOS 550D finally catches up with most of its competitors by increasing that to +/- 5. 0 EV, which can be combined with +/- 2. 0 EV Bracketing.

Note that you can only see +/- 2. 0EV indicated in the viewfinder (the scale hasn "t changed).

08.02.2010 22:49:00
quote:
:
on what you are going to watch it then? A TV format with a resolution much? You kind of do not live in Japan, no? [/ off]

Cinemas 4K (4000 pixels on the long side of the frame) in Moscow already, and in two years will already 8k - there'll be watching.

08.02.2010 22:53:00
AF does not seem to 7-ki, and is easier, but body price - $ 800 in the US!
http: // www. dpreview. com / previews / CanonEOS550D / page2. asp
 

08.02.2010 22:57:00

In-in, half the price, and picture (if possible to remove) and compatibility with the optics / Flashes (except wireless E-TTL control external system flashes) is the same.

Canon EOS 550D / Rebel T2i / Kiss X4 Digital

info@www.about-digital-photo.com