FAQ: Canon EOS 450D / Digital Rebel XSi Volume III


30.12.2009 14:11:00
This take into their ranks. . .

Native me unlikely to approve, but I bought it. Canon 450D. First SLR in your life.

Sometimes you buy a new piece, and brings home disappointed - it is no better than the old one, only buttons-ruchechki differently arranged.

In this case, there was no disappointment - after all SLR differ markedly from non-SLR.

What really liked how the system is the focus - that is, I know, and I can choose where to focus frame and easily get beautiful bokeh (As far as I know, bokeh - it's cool )

But seriously, previous models, I almost never knew exactly how to focus the unit. But this is probably one of the main and important functions.

Well, then - mastered 1/2 instructions, keep doing it. While clearly not all, but if it is short - enjoy. Like device, like the process, one does not like it - that all this money is needed.

I used are still very reasonable to the lens as Olympus SP-570 and SP-590 with a focal length of 26-520 mm or ~ ~ 26-676 mm. There are such in nature?
 

30.12.2009 14:32:00

I used are still very reasonable to the lens as Olympus SP-570 and SP-590 with a focal length of 26-520 mm or ~ ~ 26-676 mm. There are such in nature?
These do not happen, but there http: // www. tamron. com / lenses / prod / 18270_vc. asp

30.12.2009 14:32:00

I know and I can choose where to focus frame and easily get beautiful bokeh
If you really want to choose where is the area of ​​field, learn better manual focus.
And about bokeh in the first stage is better to forget, because noticed and appreciated by connoisseurs, it is only "a small circle of limited people" ((c) M. Zadornov). Especially with China.
better to do the basics of composition and fotosveta.
I used are still very reasonable to lens
This break-former Snapshooters superzumnika, will soon pass.
All budget superzoom for DSLRs (type 18-250) give a picture at the soap dish. And was it worth while to take the SLR?
At first, would be enough to buy additionally CANON EOS 55-250 IS.
In general, congratulations on a great gift to itself favorite, on NG.
a great shot!

30.12.2009 14:48:00

I used are still very reasonable to the lens as Olympus SP-570 and SP-590 with a focal length of 26-520 mm or ~ ~ 26-676 mm. There are such in nature?
happens, but then Mother certainly not approve

30.12.2009 15:33:00
Wellcome in our ranks

30.12.2009 15:45:00
Now to learn more pictures of normal

30.12.2009 16:20:00

I had a half a year 450y, masterpieces not see not all given

30.12.2009 22:07:00
And how do you
Bigman, for example (50-500), in addition to the whale?

31.12.2009 2:22:00

And how do you Bigman, for example (50-500), in addition to the whale?
Then it SX1 / SX10 / SX20 (EFR35: 28 - 560 mm) and f. . . . in these SLRs with lenses and rabbis.

31.12.2009 2:35:00
quote:
:
I used are still very reasonable to the lens, both the Olympus SP-570 and SP-590 with a focal length of 26-520 mm or ~ ~ 26-676 mm. There are such in nature?
Nature is organized as follows. The frame size (line) at your reflex 4 times greater than that of said Olympus. Linear dimensions (dimensions) of the desired lens also will be 4 times greater, and the weight, respectively, in 3 4 ** == 64 times, well defined partial price weighing partially lens surface area - so that somewhere in the approximate times 30 more expensive, given the same share in the cost of tooling, and as expensive things have disproportionately few buyers, the price of a piece of production is difficult to imagine - you have to pay not only the object but also the plant for its production. But to work with such customers nice, they are actually partners. . .

31.12.2009 12:11:00
quote:
:

And how do you Bigman, for example (50-500), in addition to the whale?

um, yeah. Here, apparently, just need to buy a crane and dolly to him.

I now just can not understand how Olympus upihat EGF 26-676 mm. in a fairly modest in size of the object?

31.12.2009 12:20:00

I now just can not understand how Olympus upihat EGF 26-676 mm. in a fairly modest in size of the object?
And you crop factor taken into account Olympus (5, 65x)? Real DF had 4, 6 - 119, 6 mm - nothing outstanding in this package are not shove.

31.12.2009 12:38:00
quote:
:

And you crop factor taken into account Olympus (5, 65x)? Real DF had 4, 6 - 119, 6 mm - nothing outstanding in this package are not shove.

Would you like something without matershiny words (such as "crop") communicated with newcomers.

Since SLR in my life first, while I only know what the EGF, and that means the first and second digit.

About that shoot cameras and DSLRs have identical numbers mean very different characteristics, is not yet known. I will go read about the crop and other things.

31.12.2009 16:12:00

And you crop factor taken into account Olympus (5, 65x)?

do not mislead the .

If you are talking about Olympus DSLRs, the crop factor they "2X".

31.12.2009 16:49:00
quote:
:

And you crop factor taken into account Olympus (5, 65x)?

do not mislead the .

If you are talking about Olympus DSLRs, the crop factor they "2X".
Did you actually read a topic or just the last post? Absolutely certain cameras are discussed: two models ultrazumomylnits.

31.12.2009 18:13:00

Would you like something without matershiny words (such as "crop") communicated with newcomers.

Since SLR in my life first, while I only know what the EGF, and that means the first and second digit.

EGF actually considered using the crop factor, t. E. The relationship "normal" frame of 36 mm to the real size of the matrix.

31.12.2009 18:50:00

About that shoot cameras and DSLRs have identical numbers mean very different characteristics, is not yet known. I will go read about the crop and other things.
Recommend - start with Afanas: http: // www. afanas. ru / ROF / rof0. htm

31.12.2009 20:02:00

Did you actually read a topic or just the last post? Absolutely certain cameras are discussed: two models ultrazumomylnits.

read.
Moreover, there is nothing to discuss them in the theme of CZK .
You see how I understood it, after reading only a few extreme positions?

01.01.2010 21:04:00
quote:
:
quote:
:

And how do you Bigman, for example (50-500), in addition to the whale?

here I just do not understand how Olympus upihat EGF 26-676 mm. in a fairly modest in size of the object?

you also post above otveteli or you read selectively?

03.01.2010
Another is that something in the FAQ or any instructions I can not find as indicated by full diopter adjustment lens in the eye cup? he bought a couple of years ago and now I can not ask nowhere to be found

03.01.2010 3:02:00

The instructions simply "Dioptric Adjustment Lens E". Well, maybe more, and value added diopters.
or look here Extension Eyepiece Canon EP-EX15 Eyepiece Extender and Dioptric Adjustment Lens E

03.01.2010 9:45:00

The instructions simply "Dioptric Adjustment Lens E". Well, maybe more, and value added diopters.
Oh, thank you so kind and it was

04.01.2010 5:11:00
I just found out that my EOS450 autofocus mode Lifeview.
Only it was necessary to include.

But the question is, who enjoys it:

What is the difference between Quick mode vs. Livemode?

04.01.2010 13:34:00

What is the difference between Quick mode vs. Livemode?

In fast mode, the mirror flips up and the focus is on the phase detector.
In another mode, the subject is focused on the contrast in soap dish - more slowly, but the front / back focus is excluded.
I take it by contrast when shooting static scenes.

05.01.2010 23:27:00
Who you clean the image sensor?

On a photo a smudge on a blue background - obviously dust or droplets. http: // radioextreme. ru / img / 008. jpg . The lens is changed or when the zoom they sohranyatyutsya - hence the matrix.

I wanted here is a kit to buy: http: // pleer. ru / _22580. html

06.01.2010 0:19:00

But the question is, who enjoys it:
I use. Conveniently
  • shoot static objects with a tripod
  • focus manually with an increase (again better than a tripod)
 

06.01.2010 0:40:00
Who
than pure matrix?

Never cleaned on any of their cameras
But friends recommend Shwab, or whatever it is they, "shvabrochki" cleaning matrices shorter.

06.01.2010 13:02:00
I would not clean, if not dust or some drops, which can be seen on the photo. Not always of course, but still.

06.01.2010 13:21:00

seen in the photo. Not always of course, but still.
fotogrushey blow away.
Remove the gray surface in Rasfokus (possible with hands) Av mode with an aperture 29, look at the computer output, faint, wake up, take 100 grams of the fridge and forgotten like a bad dream.
When taking care not to put the diaphragm above 11.

06.01.2010 13:25:00
Who
than pure matrix?

ttp: // forum. ixbt. com /? id = 20 & amp; name = clean

09.01.2010 19:07:00
Hello Dear participants of the forum!

This problem - his wife bought a Canon 450D DSLR with kit lens, soap dish that was before her, apparently not satisfied with When shooting in automatic mode everything seems to be fine. But in manual photo in JPEG hopelessly out into the blue. Read about the settings - such as white balance is to blame, but it neither changed from blue to get rid fails When shooting in RAW open the photo in Photoshop - too blue, but if you increase the "temperature", the picture looks quite normal. You can find out from you - the way it should be? In manual mode, a JPEG is not directly take pictures of Or is there some kind of setting you want to change? Example photo - http: // i1. fastpic. ru / big / 2010/0109 / 1b / 21b693b9f179b4 ... 9b1ae2fa55c1b. jpg , I shook it to pump less, but blue or gone anywhere.

09.01.2010 19:18:00

When shooting in RAW open the photo in Photoshop - too blue, but if you increase the "temperature", the picture looks quite normal

then the matter in the white balance uniquely


Or is there some kind of setting you want to change?
yes it is the white balance and the need to put in a cell for dzhipega - have both sets for different conditions. th and manual bb


09.01.2010 20:13:00
Thank you, really stood manual white balance translated it to "cloudy", the benefit that has a button on the camera WB, the color temperature is increased and now the pictures look natural.

09.01.2010 21:18:00

translated it to "cloudy",
Try to translate to AUTO, obtained good shots, especially with flash. The camera
good automatics.

wife bought Canon 450D DSLR with kit lens. . .
wife you - determined woman, congratulations on your purchase and good photos!

09.01.2010 21:25:00
Prompt please.
Now 450D stands memory card Transcend 16Gb 133x Class 6, bought with the apparatus of the year and a half ago.
My experience has shown that in traveling one card is missing (rented only equal).
now want to take a second card for 16 gigs, and a question - is it worth buying a card or even 150x faster or 450D and 133h through the roof? Thank U.

09.01.2010 22:39:00
and feels weak to solve? I do with any card brakes do not notice, even raw. IMHO, only for burst shooting.

10.01.2010 12:50:00

- If you shoot lots and lots - preferably Sandisk Extreme III or new Class10.
In other cases, any Class6 go. Canon cameras have full compatibility speed is not all Flaschka.
In addition, many manufacturers flashek write only the speed of reading, writing can be a lot nedlenneeeee.

10.01.2010 14:02:00
I own this (Canon EOS 450 D) camera for about a year. He took it with "whale" lens, so with him and shoot. Not happy with a focus on pictures. Settings: RAW. sharpness (style) 6, when processing DPP sharpness add almost all the "coil". When viewed in Windows XP (An image viewer for) is not a good focus. Question to those who switched from "whale" of the lens to the other at least a class above, the focus becomes clearer or it balezn this model? See to what spasobna this camera and to aspire to. A link to the JPEG without any processing. Knechno the easiest way to take a different lens but just compare. But this is not possible, the city does not offer large to Moscow 1000 km.

10.01.2010 14:53:00

sharpness (style) 6, when processing DPP sharpness add almost all the "coil".
focus becomes clearer or it balezn this model?
I think it is not a disease and the camera or lens case in your perception of this approach (probably after the soap dish)

whale is not the sharpest lens, even among zooms. If you need it Sharpen - use the fixes, it is desirable to close - they sharpen one of the important characteristics.

or I did not understand, and the problem is not in the field namely miss the focus? (Focus may not be enough)

10.01.2010 17:10:00
as for me Canon EF-S 18-55mm f / 3. 5-5. 6 IS "dark" and soaps - that is what the budget.
but the EF-S 55-250mm f / 4-5. 6 IS - at times better (though he no longer telephoto). As for me sharper and misses him a fraction was (and maybe prilovchilis ) though too dark.

10.01.2010 17:27:00
Shots by focusing not. Just the image itself turns soap. So you have to add it all available sposabomi. That hchetsya understand where crap. Perception is all different, I agree. But idial picture this approximation to what you see. I would like to posmatret pictures without treatment was capable 450D.

10.01.2010 17:32:00

just the image itself turns soap
give an example

But idial picture this approximation to what you see
example I see less sharply than in the pictures

Want to posmatret pictures without treatment was capable 450D.
here plays the role no longer camera and lens

10.01.2010 17:39:00
I would like to
posmatret pictures without treatment was capable 450D.

green mode and a tripod, fixed object contrast and delayed shooting - in order to eliminate jitter.
think then we will see what and how.

10.01.2010 18:08:00
I took it. There shtatif, have remote control, a lot of experimentation. All that is capable squeezed my camera- naturally with "whale" pritenzii to focus. Once again I ask who has the JPEG photos taken with Canon EOS 450 D, and said, "like this should shoot this camera", of course it is only about focus.

10.01.2010 18:12:00

like this should shoot this camera
I repeat - lens gives a sharp or blurred image and the camera is not
Well example http: // www. photosight. ru / photos / 3549751 /

10.01.2010 18:29:00
quote:
:
whale is not the sharpest lens, even among zooms. If you need it Sharpen - use the fixes, it is desirable to close - they sharpen one of the important characteristics.

remember what a shock I experienced when, instead of China set the cheapest fifty dollars 50 1 8, which is more like a plastic toy and is 3 thousand in all.
Sharpness become, dare I say it, like a soap dish

afraid to even imagine what the picture 50 1. 2..

10.01.2010 18:32:00

afraid to even imagine what the picture 50 1. 2..
well field there is no more, and in the general picture is of course a very worthy

10.01.2010 18:38:00

Choate I do not understand what happens - the quality inferior to fifty dollars a whale? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? so I will not believe.
Maybe then some fifty dollars left.

10.01.2010 18:43:00

let not seem contrary to mention Sharpness become, dare I say it, like a soap dish
praised the sharpness poltosu
 

10.01.2010 19:05:00
So I wanted to see the sharpness even with 50/1. 8. Once all the settings focus on zero contrast, JPEG, and without treatment. It is desirable table and it subjects boxes, pens, mouse. . . Landscape is not suitable for assessing very colorful picture. And can I just fluttering.

FAQ: Canon EOS 450D / Digital Rebel XSi Volume III

info@www.about-digital-photo.com