FAQ: Canon EOS 450D / Digital Rebel XSi Volume III


08.02.2009 21:31:00

strange reasoning, very strange. . . .
probably worth considering that each of us lives in a strange world. . . And these worlds we may be very different. . .
and plot predpochteiya, and the ability to move, we are also different (mean hiking, travel and so on. N.)
therefore humbly believe that everyone ought to know, as it is more convenient to operate in a strange world.
Disputes on the subject hardly give birth to the truth. Rather, the child will suffer, splashed out with the bath water.
 

08.02.2009 21:36:00

everyone ought to know, as it is more convenient to operate in a strange world

08.02.2009 21:44:00
quote:
:

This slang names RAW converters. Look theme Capture One and other modern RAW converters Volume II.

thanks. .

08.02.2009 22:19:00

therefore humbly believe that everyone ought to know, as it is more convenient to operate in a strange world.
that this strange world we live and develop, it must be built on a solid foundation. This foundation is the knowledge that we on this forum exchange, and then each takes the right decision for your world. Is not this is the truth?

08.02.2009 22:38:00

This foundation is the knowledge that we have on this forum exchange, and then everyone takes the right decision for your peace


Is not this is the truth?
What is truth?
Filosofsie technical problems on board? ! Right now we have removed for moveton

08.02.2009 23:04:00
It would seem that where does the 450D?


Right now we removed for moveton

So like there is nothing. Normal conversation, no technical discussions do not interrupt. Here to remind about the magic tag off is worth it. And about (quote) Small and brief digression . I recall.

09.02.2009 7:04:00

When I edit Jpeg, then I just saved in the TIFF. If I had to then print again. I understand that from RAW is better, but I have to learn it.

zhipeg from the camera with the losses already editing it, you are making losses again - to save Tiff to save.

09.02.2009 9:13:00
yes fever also more Rabbi, why did he do

09.02.2009 9:27:00

zhipeg from the camera with the losses already editing it, you are making losses again - to save Tiff to save.
Yes, I already knew what to shoot in RAW. Although now places on the map, there is very little. I have a 4 gig card on. We must Pobol buy. I now just RAW converters from Canon mastering software. Digital Photo Professional I like, but there I get only a small icon to edit. Maybe I do wrong? A Zoom Browser not all settings. But in general, RAW, of course, is salvation. Yesterday two frames with an interesting plot were very dark (I was very wrong with the exposure), one was in Jpeg and gone forever, and the second was in RAW + Jpeg and I was able to recover it almost perfectly. And then I throw in Photoshop in Tiff.

09.02.2009 9:32:00

I have 4 gig card on.

Hmm, you little 270 shots? Wedding shoot?

09.02.2009 9:47:00

rats. They are restless.

09.02.2009 9:47:00
quote:
:

in my photo album also has two test image (album Test) look if you're interested. There is a difference, but for me is not critical in certain circumstances \\ stories.
If a picture with the packaging of coffee here questions arise:
1. In Ekzife specified in both the program ACD. From Where?
2. If + RAV zhpeg images should be identical in the arrangement and these are not identical. This IMHO 2 different frame.
For these tests is not entirely correct.
Yes, all just most likely the file is truncated to them. Size is not their 12MP. A snapshot of exactly do first in the PAB (mine in P mode), and then immediately another in JPEG, though exactly in the base area and the same place (the chair at the table). I will clarify a bit more about the shooting in JPEG, it can only be removed when I'm in the zone of the base by which the thread scene. If I'm in the creative area, there is only the RAV and any JPEG or even more (IMHO) PAB + jpeg. And you have 450 minutes? If there make a photo as you wrote above, and again as I did (one shot in the RAV in creative zone, the other at the base in jpeg) and place here will be interesting to see, and discuss in detail. Only envelopes RAV in DPP please. Thank U.

09.02.2009 9:49:00

rats. They are restless.

Well, you're shooting the same house - filmed 270 frames, 2 minutes leaked to the computer through the reader again to take a picture

09.02.2009 12:20:00

throw in Photoshop in Tiff.
And what you do not like the RAW converter in Photoshop? It features more than DPP, and they are more visible, IMHO.

09.02.2009 12:48:00

And what you do not like the RAW converter in Photoshop? It features more than DPP, and they are more visible, IMHO.
Well, I believe the native currency safer.

09.02.2009 12:51:00
The available

Maybe someone will be interested: Evaluation of different size DSLRs Canan

09.02.2009 12:59:00

Well, I believe the native currency reliable
In what sense?

09.02.2009 15:23:00

I can assume that in terms of the reliability of colors and everything. After divays and softina from one office. . .

09.02.2009 15:47:00
And how to print photos yourself? There was a canon A610 + printer canon selphy (exact model later say, but I do not think that it is important), and he only printed photos from the camera (although maybe I'm wrong but did not want the other pictures to print). Now there 450D, shoot in RAW, JPG envelope Well it turns out that the pictures are not from the camera down directly, and through the conversion of a program and it does not print them too. . . . does anyone know how to make?

09.02.2009 15:56:00
Maybe the forum PERIPHERALS ask?
Peripherals

09.02.2009 15:58:00
and from Rabbi does not print? (It is clear that converting)
can then be equal to + zhpeg shoot

09.02.2009 15:59:00

I can assume that in terms of the reliability of colors and everything. After divays and softina from one office. . .
Yes, exactly. Because those who have done this utility, knew the stuffing chamber.

09.02.2009 17:02:00

dzhipegi can pour back into the camera and try to print?

09.02.2009 17:22:00

and from Rabbi does not print? (It is clear that converting)
can then be equal to + zhpeg shoot

From RAW + JPEG also does not print, even it is not clear why.

09.02.2009 17:32:00

And you have 450 minutes?
I now 400. In principle, I thought to buy now even cho thread probably the same 450 but today I say the following. Unfortunately, there is all the polls, including sellers trade bucks on the stock exchange. Carry some cameras they broke. So buy Canan - Today the problem. Shelves even from wholesale suppliers. Promised new uznatpo the end of the week. If the forecasts of the stabilization of the currency market are met (and I think it will be so, at least until April) then begin again quietly fotoprodavtsy haggling cameras. But as soon as my hands will get 450 D I'll do a comparative conversion. You can even add a third-party converters will.

09.02.2009 17:33:00
interesting review. just another translation would be. . . . and so even on the submitted images and photos look was inetersno
 

09.02.2009 20:04:00
I understand that it is still not the right forum, but no one in The provinces of them not responding.


way, yes, a good option - it is necessary to try, that is. To. If you remove a JPG JPG easily print directly from the camera. But tell me then how to fill in the files from a computer to the camera down? Normal explorer does not, EOS Utility and ZoomBrowser sort contrary from the camera to the computer, but as back then?

09.02.2009 20:06:00

but like back then?
card reader

09.02.2009 20:29:00

Google translation of the review here


Gut.


09.02.2009 21:19:00

card reader no. More precisely it is, but it does not support such large amounts as a flash drive. What is strange - in Zoombrowser if zakonnektitsya to A610, then there is a menu to fill in the pictures the camera down, but when I choose a photo from the 450D, it says that the sizes are not the + jpg been altered after photographing and therefore will not be possible to view on the camera down and cancels the operation. . . . but for the 450D does not have such a menu to try to fill in pictures. . . Come on already offtopic in this topic, I'll try to find a cable to connect the printer to a computer, it may happen. . . but still wondering how you can still pour pictures on 450D

09.02.2009 21:27:00

native software will not work
reader 100r worth but solves all problems, it is necessary to spend

09.02.2009 23:15:00
quote:
: & gt; . . . Bought a Voltage protection Hot Shoe PC Adapter for Canon Nikon from KONOVA (Korea). . . . waiting for delivery. .
quote:
: & gt; . . . immediately tell where he bought it and that thing with reference, you never know who is useful
think together upon arrival, but just wondering now, from here:
http: // cgi. ebay. com / ws / eBayISAPI. dll? ViewItem & amp; item = 190282030126
Delivery finally occurred. Tried in practice and that is especially pleased camera is not burned.
seems not deceived Koreans. Ancient blaze works took off with it, and there may be a normal and ruined.
Model SM-512 :

10.02.2009 2:26:00
quote:

When I edit Jpeg, then I just saved in the TIFF. If I had to then print again. I understand that from RAW is better, but I have to learn it.

Basically, you're doing well.
If you do not want to delve into the Digital Photo Professional, you can learn just a couple of functions:
1. Konveritirovanie RAW directly into TIFF, and not as a JPEG.
2. As I understand it, you are shooting at home or in the same conditions.
To do this, you can use a regular sheet of white paper when shooting.
You can remove it once, and poke a pipette white balance and remember.

looked and found this: color image and black-and-white. Top
mode "Normal" at the bottom of "Black and White".
winter-summer. Part 1: Winter.

http: // fotograf-alexandr-1. w777w. ru / image / 2239/18216

10.02.2009 6:59:00
I have a question about Aggregate lens 18-55is China.

Like idafragma - is an element of creativity (blur, wasps tavit sharp) background, focus on the ear, to the eye, an element of the landscape, and so on. N.

But China (I specifically) are very narrow operating range with normal diaphragms sharpness.
such as FR = 18mm is 5. 6-8. 0,
on 55mm 7. 1-9. 0

As a result, almost the All shots are taken dia = 7. 1.
and how well it works?

Of course, you can buy 17-55, but not during the "crisis" because prices go up Dolar.

as you shoot (if you are shooting a whale)?

fact that 3 5 4 11 simply not suitable for use. sharpness is terrible.

10.02.2009 8:48:00

a whale is not creative, it is firstly
second range a bit more - with the most open to 11 and then a little mylnovato, but you can use
if not treated in 100% scale, and to print or view the entire picture on the monitor

and you thought on, we prove, fifty dollars f / 1, 4 - 2 8 is suitable for your own measure?


10.02.2009 10:22:00
yes, if you do not look 100% can not see anything, well, we're not monitor SLR buy.

to print on 15x20 already seen. I have even more to say.

on the DF = 50 mm, at 5. 6 hole field nastoleko no, it seems that the focus is missed, ie. E.
the portrait facial eyelashes are blurred, and 7. . 8 quite clearly.

or questions that was my general. just wondering on CIT others also put a narrow range?

10.02.2009 10:51:00

I put on open until 11 and Nitsche
can you really with a focus that is

naturally nambolshaya sharpness 6, 3-9


10.02.2009 11:32:00
quote:
:
fact that 3. 5, 4, 11, is simply not suitable for use. sharpness is terrible.
Victor! Tell pozh What made this strange conclusion?

10.02.2009 11:33:00

sharpness terrible.
stabilizer works? Use a tripod try?

And anyway, I'm happy with the sharpness of a whale more than 50 EF 1. 8, which is generally scared to use.


10.02.2009 11:42:00

Basically, you are doing it right.
If you do not want to delve into the Digital Photo Professional, you can learn just a couple of functions:

There is not delve into that. It's very simple. But it is not always convenient.

2. As I understand it, you are shooting at home or in the same conditions.
To do this, you can use a regular sheet of white paper when shooting.
You can remove it once, and poke a pipette white balance and remember.

If I shoot in the same conditions, it does not mean that I have all the pictures with the same exposure and WB.

I still here on the advice passed on Photoshop - at least it's more convenient.

10.02.2009 11:48:00

lightroom try
brake, but I like the result

10.02.2009 11:51:00
Yes
in general and how you have written. The working range of the diaphragm for poppies. field, really about 5. 6-8. Here take a look here (15Mp) and here (8MP). Someone pays attention to it, some do not. I can recommend when shooting wide open to sharpen up 4-5 in the DPP upon conversion of the RAV or immediately in styles on the camera. The difference is noticeable. Try even on the same "hole" to shoot with a different value of field (0 to 5). Only shooting conditions should be good, otherwise all bjaka povylazet immediately, especially when increasing the value to 6-7.

10.02.2009 11:54:00

if you raise more than 4 styles (on camera) is already at the edges of the squares of contrasting transitions climb, although if the print can not see them. . .

10.02.2009 12:02:00
thank you! ! ! original translation , but are common sense can understand

10.02.2009 12:07:00

Squares it's the little things. I personally do not put more than 4 (on the standard cost). But I think 5 more you can still apply on some subjects. By the way I then compared the pictures taken 450 m and 1000 m. Damn think of. . . why pictures of these 450 are not sharp? Found the same benefit Rava both, and compared to you think? If here and there to set the sharpness of 4, all identical or nearly identical, the eye can no longer distinguish the differences. Here we go. It seems testoviki why then at the 450-m putting style neutral (where the sharpness 0) and the 1000 Standard.

10.02.2009 12:25:00

well, like, 450d is advanced for further processing
1000d immediately must return a result

way, like w in the new version that dpp 0 0 in the chamber and in the converter are not the same


10.02.2009 12:29:00

testoviki seems, for some reason on the 450th put style neutral (where the sharpness 0), and by 1000 most likely standard.
Well, then it's unfortunate testoviki.
Even in the manual says that the styles neutral and accurate - this is for those who then also handle pictures on your computer. Initially they look presentable.
me in most cases satisfied the standard style.


Still, it seems that you have something with the lens. Check the front / back. And if you find something really recommend align in service. I after adjusting sharpness significantly increased - AF was hit where necessary.
In my tests (test on a flat picture) working aperture whale - 18 mm 5, 6-11, 8-11 to 55 mm.

10.02.2009 13:03:00

easier to check the focus by removing the same frame mode with autofocus lv contrast

11.02.2009 0:11:00
Today, completed the editing of his review as compared CANON 450D and CANON 40D

CANON 450D compare and contrast CANON40D .

And found an error in the instructions to the Russian CANON 450D. Then I
few hours I spent on the verification of this information on the Internet, however,
not met the review will tell us about this error.
I'm afraid to write about sensations, but in fact, I believe that this is a serious omission!
After I acquired the camera, being sure that
at CANON 450D pentaprism, like CANON 40D, NIKON D90, but it was not so, it was pentamirror!
Moreover, sellers shop also say that in the CANON 450D pentaprism and pentamirror not. Here

instructions for CANON 450D:
http: // fotograf-alexandr-1. w777w. ru / file / index

On page 179 we read:
"Viewfinder: eye-level." And, in fact, it turns out that not pentaprism (it is better, lighter and more expensive), and pentamirror! ! !
In any case, bring your link and text on foreign resources: (I apologize for his designation, but it ofitsmalny products webpage):
clarify the link, a new address:

http: // www. canon-europe. com / for_home / compare_product ... eras / digital_slr /

VIEWFINDER
CANON 450D: Pentamirror
CANON 50D: Pentaprism
check your printed instructions, it appears in black and white:
"PETAPRIZMA"! A MUST BE pentamirror!
owners CANON 450D respond!
What is written in your manual?

PS Do not rush immediately to write, it's all nonsense. In fact, the class of the camera is determined by various parameters, including such important, what should the viewfinder: pentaprism or pentamirror . The differences between them can be read by typing in the Google search.
 

11.02.2009 0:15:00

Today, completed the editing of his review as compared CANON 450D and CANON 40D
CANON 450D compare and contrast CANON40D.

Link wrongly inserted, quotes should be removed.


Just in case, bring your link and text on foreign resources: (I apologize for his designation, but it ofitsmalny products webpage):

http: // www. canon-europe. com / for_home. . . s / digital_slr /


And this link is also incorrect.

FAQ: Canon EOS 450D / Digital Rebel XSi Volume III

info@www.about-digital-photo.com