FAQ: Canon EOS 450D / Digital Rebel XSi Volume III


27.10.2009 17:50:00
Image Sensor Cleaning / viewfinder at the service center for warranty paid?
 

27.10.2009 18:33:00

yes

27.10.2009 18:56:00
I read a lot of horror stories about the dirt on the sensor, and also thought that this is a problem. It turned out that all is not so bad. Matrix cleaned once lenspenom matrices in June. Summer is over, the lenses on the street I am often in different weather, in the end at the moment matrix net. With regard to the viewfinder, just tried to clean it with a brush. When looked - was horrified, so much dust there inflicted. All is fine blown away pear and also clean the viewfinder. What image sensor cleaning is unsustainable for the novice task - not true. Matrix is ​​not so delicate detail, so it can be easily damaged.

27.10.2009 18:59:00
Thank U. All clear. I thought that for free. Wrong.

27.10.2009 21:07:00
quote:
:
Image Sensor Cleaning / viewfinder at the service center for warranty paid?
dirt on the sensor is not covered by warranty.

30.10.2009 10:50:00
All the good days.
Say AMPs, anyone used to sabzh magnifier eyepiece, that's a - EP-EX15 Eye-piece Extender ( http: // fotosale. Com. Ua / product_N6351. Htm) ? If yes, then say, it really increases the distortion / shading and shows all the same area as the viewfinder without him? Not like magnifying eyecups that show less space and at the same angles darker?
Thanks in advance.

30.10.2009 11:08:00

Took somehow Chinese counterpart - the 450 th normally not compromised because of the shape of the body (at 350-400-40 posed). Picture this thing is reduced.

30.10.2009 11:56:00
Prompt - there 450D + 18-55 IS whale whether to buy or sell 55-250 whales and buy one, but better quality lens of average quality instead of two? And in the second case bought within $ 500?

30.10.2009 12:22:00
Logically
- better than 1 class than 2 so-so. (But I have the same kit + 50 1 8).
And I now buy only became something of a series of zoom (or Shirikov, everything depends on the tasks) L USM, and they suspect that there are at least 500. e.
Theoretically, if the throw kit and add, then come 28-135 mm f / 3. 5-5. 6 IS USM, or we should really big zoom?

30.10.2009 12:23:00

lens of higher quality instead of two with a range of ~ 18-250 DF? I do not know this. Two better pick up is possible, but rather each will cost & gt; $ 500. Camera Lenses Canon EOS-mount EF-S and EF. Crop x1. 6, APS-C sensor. (Part 5), best staff Zuma cropped Canon (Canon).

30.10.2009 12:27:00
the question is not the subject. . . . .
500 buy Tamra 17-50 / 2. 8

Camera Lenses Canon EOS-mount EF-S and EF. Crop x1. 6, APS-C sensor. (Part 5)

30.10.2009 12:28:00
quote:
:
Prompt - there 450D + 18-55 IS whale whether to buy or sell 55-250 whales and buy one, but better quality lens of average quality instead of two? And in the second case bought within $ 500?
And where do you find 18-250 higher quality, but still just $ 500? ? ? ? Tell me and I will immediately change their escape Sigma 18-200 OS.


but soon everyone will be & gt; $ 500.
. . . much more. . .


30.10.2009 12:40:00
Yes, of course I mean not a imell diapazaon focus, sorry, that does not have this momet. The need for a degree of magnification, yet not experienced, just look in the direction of 55-250, as he was praised (including its cost).

30.10.2009 12:43:00

need for such a degree of magnification has not yet experienced

So think about it at all, and you need something? How often and in what situations will be using telephoto, whether it is necessary at all?
Maybe better to take a fix? Shirikov type or 10-22? Or flash? Or a set of light (umbrellas, softboxes, stands)?

Sit down and think, write on paper.

30.10.2009 12:49:00

I suppose to buy based solely on price and reviews, not including the list of criteria for their needs, not quite right. You also probably have some preferences in the pictures and you know approximately where you are missing a whale? Or maybe you do not need to change it to something else? Take a look at topics lenses, there is a lot of useful information.

30.10.2009 13:13:00

Trite write what it is you need to

30.10.2009 13:15:00

I EX15. Of course with the glasses is more convenient to view all angles and image soootvetstvenno less.

30.10.2009 13:42:00

Say AMPs, anyone used to sabzh magnifying eyepiece, that's a - EP-EX15 Eye-piece Extender ( http: // fotosale. Com. Ua / product_N6351. Htm) ? If yes, then say, it really increases the distortion / shading and shows all the same area as the viewfinder without him? Not like magnifying eyecups that show less space and at the same angles darker?

I have any. Shows the entire area of ​​the viewfinder. Vignetting (darkening of the corners) in the eye is not evident, measured not measured. Hardly noticeable (live, however, does not prevent) a barrel. Significantly reduces the image.

For the latter reason I did not go to this thing, and lies idle.

One great thing EP-EX15 makes - nose to the screen no longer poke and his right thumb in the eye is not so brazenly climbs.

upd. With respect to EP-EX15 agree with overview on the famous site - EP-EX15 is inexpensive, if not go much to lose, and go to be a very good buy.


30.10.2009 14:05:00
Thanks to all responded!
,, and little can explain how it reduces the image? Its purpose is to increase since. . .
write in the description as follows: "The eyepiece magnifier, makes a point of focus eyepiece 15mm, which improves the user experience, especially for photographers working in glasses (from a distance of 15mm from the eyepiece see the full frame)."

30.10.2009 14:28:00
quote:
:
Thanks to all responded!
,, and little can explain how it reduces the image? Its purpose is to increase since. . .
write in the description as follows: "The eyepiece magnifier, makes a point of focus eyepiece 15mm, which improves the user experience, especially for photographers working in glasses (from a distance of 15mm from the eyepiece see the full frame)."
And where it says that it should zoom in? ? Its function "makes a point of focus eyepiece 15mm."

30.10.2009 14:31:00
That I do not understand something as physically looks . . . Excuse Me. .
Buy perhaps it's not really very expensive, and I will learn

30.10.2009 14:35:00
quote:
:
, and here I do not understand something, as it physically looks . . . Excuse Me. .

Due to the negative lens built into this device is the focal point of the eyepiece is shifted back to 15 mm, the angular size of the image in the viewfinder is reduced accordingly. . .

Incidentally, it is not the correct translation, "Extender" is not a "magnifier", but rather in this case the "Extension".

30.10.2009 14:37:00
Thanks

31.10.2009 6:33:00
More
here such things are. .
http: // cgi. ebay. com / TENPA-1. 36x-ViewFinder-Magnifier-Eyecup-Eyepiece-4 -
DSLR_W0QQitemZ280407459857QQcmdZViewItemQQimsxZ20091009? IMSfp = TL091009167008r20694

31.10.2009 19:21:00
This
I have not gone too, is in the closet. My review of it is in this branch.

31.10.2009 23:51:00
.
Unfortunately, links to e-bay do not always work. If it
about angular, then I also did not go too is in the closet.
IMHO, these extenders are only needed if there are problems with vision or, in the case of corner, features specific subjects. Personally, I acquired uglovik not to bow down when taking pictures of flowers from a low point. Really did not help - went to the closet.
Cases with manual focus decides to replace the screen. But I believe that the topic was not ready for this.
 

01.11.2009
Tell me that it is better to buy for the same price:
b / y Sigma AF 18-200mm F3. 5-6. 3 DC OS (in ex. Comp., 5 months.)
or
new Canon 55-250?

first if normal quality - you can hardly be removed from the carcass. Or am I wrong?

01.11.2009 0:58:00

first if normal quality - you can hardly be removed from the carcass. Or am I wrong?
wrong. Well worth assess which focus really needed for most personal preference?
understand that hotsa have a universe "on a sudden." What if the alien from behind a bush pops or yeti away imagined?
But it should be hard to understand that the more zoom, the lower the quality.
really have 55-250. Excellent lens, but is needed in 10% of cases. And they are predictable, ie. E. I take it with you when you need it.
The rest, 18-55 IS more than satisfied.
18-200 - this is so. Called. Travel zoom and shoot it only makes sense in a sightseeing trip when the shooting conditions, indeed, are not predictable. I emphasize, not on vacation, namely excursions, rigidly tied to the tour group, t. E. "Crossing Europe".
not replace it a bunch of 18-55 IS + 55-250 IS, t. To. The quality is worse.

01.11.2009 13:25:00

And there is also the new Canan 15-85 (~ 800ue) and 18-135 (~ 450ue). Tests can look here http: // www. photozone. de / canon-eos . Another note on the Sigma 18-125OS (~ 350y). Price \\ \\ quality versatility in his favor. Imho.

01.11.2009 14:48:00

And there is also the new Canan 15-85 (~ 800ue) and 18-135 (~ 450ue).
Sorry, not EF -135 mm f / 3. 5-5. 6 IS USM you mean?

Yeah, found 18-135, sorry.

02.11.2009 6:04:00

Happy!

02.11.2009 10:33:00
Happy Birthday!

02.11.2009 10:56:00


Thank you.

02.11.2009 12:04:00
Happy Birthday! ! ! ! !

03.11.2009 9:58:00

proposes to add an article in the FAQ (Eng.) About fill flash - http: // www. usa. canon. com / dlc / controller? act = GetArtic ... p; articleTypeID = 5 lucidly, succinctly and with pictures.

03.11.2009 10:17:00
And besides Phottix still kakienit batruchki buy?
Just look at ebee are $ 50 have to look at the terrible purely China.

And there is quite a price for toyzhe (visually) neatly made.

worth taking?

05.11.2009 13:14:00

I Travor. Made in China. I am pleased

05.11.2009 16:30:00
Canon DPP 3. 7. 2 like Russian version, the direct link (to the archive).
======= Changes from Digital Photo Professional 3. 7. 0 ====================
Supports additional models
The EOS 7D, PowerShot G11, and PowerShot S90 are now supported.
Adds an NR Preview screen (NR: Noise Reduction)
You can now adjust the NR level while checking the image status on the Preview screen. & # 88 122;
Maintains the [Collection] window
Before, when quitting Digital Photo Professional, all images in the [Collection] window were removed from the [Collection] window;
however, this has been improved so that the images in the [Collection] window can now be maintained.
Addition of new lenses that support the aberration correction function.
Newly supports the EF 100mm f / 2. 8L Macro IS USM, EF-S15-85mm f / 3. 5-5. 6 IS USM, and EF-S18-135mm f / 3. 5-5. 6 IS.

Cautions on Use
If you use the Digital Photo Professional 3. 7. 2 remote capture function, it is also necessary to download the latest version of EOS Utility.

05.11.2009 23:52:00
aratj

quote:
:
Besides Phottix still kakienit batruchki buy?
Just look at ebee are $ 50 have to look at the terrible purely China.

And there is quite a price for toyzhe (visually) neatly made.

worth taking?
^^^ I still took the $ 54 from Linkdelight c ebay (on the site they have a little more expensive, sort of). . . I liked the pen. . . however, not held until the other ...

08.11.2009 15:14:00
leaned against the outbreak of a piece of construction paper and take a picture. warped paint on paper, where there was a flash, and the smell of burnt question - Is it bad for the flash?

08.11.2009 15:37:00

bad it for flash?
I think you are easy to answer the question "is it good to flash"?

08.11.2009 15:42:00
Of course bad that apparently overheated. Although such a dense same paper was. I use a plastic reflector. Once the paper is not desirable.

08.11.2009 18:43:00

and what is bad, that the heat is not dissipated? I do not see other reasons. you light up a light bulb several thousand lumens, it is from this burn or crumble?

08.11.2009 20:15:00

fact that overheating will darken the glass itself and then go pyhi progression

08.11.2009 20:39:00

you can not wait to visit service for replacement of burnt flash?

09.11.2009 11:25:00

bad it for flash

bad due to overheating glass pyhi and deterioration of its properties
several such experiments and turn yellow glass,
cracked, it can swim evaporation burnt paper with paint. . .
then - on the rise. . .

09.11.2009 12:11:00

still new Canan 15-85 (~ 800ue) and 18-135 (~ 450ue)

first - with a huge barrel and very expensive for a dark zoom. EPIC FAIL!
second - decent, but Sigma 18-125 OS on quality even a little better.

both general - not a fountain. Or good old Sigma 18-200 OS, Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon 18-200 IS. Or
new Tamron 17-50 VC.

Generally there are several popular ligaments:
- Brigde + desired fixes
- Brigde + sverhshirik (fisheye)
- good staff telephoto zoom + cheap occasionally
-? ? ? ?

all depends on frequent shooting conditions.
We often shoot in the corridors, houses, underground and in a confined space? Without sverhshirika way.
often shoot in the dark and movement? Hello fixes.
Day turekskursiya? Brigde.

09.11.2009 12:14:00
quote:
:
course bad that apparently overheated. Although such a dense same paper was. I use a plastic reflector. Once the paper is not desirable.
reflector or diffuser? In my flash (but it is not a native Canon) plastic reflector is simply impossible to lean against the diffuser flash.

Generally speaking, flash, like any other device, it is better to use a proven manufacturer for her conditions. And suppose that if a manufacturer believes promising any other modes, somehow would check them and advertised. If it does not, then at least the stability of these modes is questionable - at least for developers.

09.11.2009 16:55:00

course diffuser. Constantly confuse the two words =)
 

09.11.2009 21:04:00

Day turekskursiya? Brigde.

I would even say "day", "tour" and "outdoors" (read - in bright sunlight).
Indoors Brigde really very sad (well, dark).

FAQ: Canon EOS 450D / Digital Rebel XSi Volume III

info@www.about-digital-photo.com