FAQ: Canon EOS 450D / Digital Rebel XSi Volume III


08.09.2009 20:58:00
quote:
:
friend asked, how much cleaning obetiva because there nabilas dust and now all the photographs I had spots matrix clean
Yet elementary imagination should be enough for people to understand that the lens creates a picture that is not theirs innards (which is usually clear-empty), and something else.
 

08.09.2009 23:41:00

well, maybe she thought that the dust on the lens creates spots
and, by the way, this may very well be, if not the most recent lenses

09.09.2009 7:03:00
Tell me why there is no color in photos, why everything turns out badly faded?

FA produces here a dzhpeg:


when in fact it looked like this:

even a little brighter.

removable end PAB + zhpg, but rabbis such as pale and had to kill a lot of time to pull colors in each photo. What to do?

09.09.2009 7:36:00

What to do?
Discover the polarizing filters

09.09.2009 7:59:00
quote:
:

What to do?
Discover the polarizing filters
Photos indoors too pale obtained.

09.09.2009 9:45:00

What to do?
A style which stands in the chamber?

rabbis same pale
As it is, how?
What Envelopes something?
Default converter (in Vol. H. And intracameral) takes the style of the camera.

Monique calibrated? It makes sense to look at the other samples Monica.

09.09.2009 11:14:00
: Rava try not to open native software. I have a palpable difference, look ACDSEE. Zhdipegi noticeably paler than Rava, and generally better color in Rawa, although I think they are all yellow.

you think it will be easier to learn Picture Style than pulling pictures every time.

09.09.2009 12:11:00

why everything turns out badly faded?
About the Picture Style you have suggested. I'd add, you, according to the Exif, standing style Neutral, which involves low-contrast and malonasyschennye images for further processing in the editor. If you do not want to bother much with the treatment, try to put in a cell style Standart, the output will be more saturated and contrast of the image. But, in my opinion, once you shoot in Raw, all settings can be set in the converter, regardless of what is in the chamber. Personally, I use Capture One Pro, which is compared with the native DPP gives more opportunities, but he, unlike the DPP, not "caught" by the camera settings, they need to be set in accordance with their preferences. But is this a problem?

09.09.2009 12:24:00
How to set styles on the list is constantly DPP, so no need to press the Browse and search in folders desired style?


But is this a problem?
Yes, the problem. Edit bunch RAWov and then make these settings in the files themselves have not survived - it's a huge problem.


09.09.2009 17:51:00
quote:
:
Hello! I here bought goods subject. Whales. And immediately the problem. Well, probably because the goods. . In the viewfinder, a pair of black points somewhat to the left and above the left point of focus. One point is barely visible, the other size is comparable to the focus point. In the photo they are not obtained. If you remove the lens - a point not disappear. How would their order. . That clean and pure at all?
himself recently was puzzled when he saw in the viewfinder and his 40 point. Began to purge the matrix. . . then began to analyze: the photograph - not, at present changing lenses. . . . conclusion - the mirror or focusing screen. . . . . . . . Then - at your own risk. . . . - T. To. Fotogrushi was not, use a regular syringe. . . (But not new). Knowing that in a few years it has passed through the body of water - about the talc is not worried. . . . . Ideally you should certainly buy a photo pear. . . . . Removed the lens and, marveling at his courage brought the end of the syringe into the carcass. . . gave him the finger, so it does not jerk, and some vigorous contractions blew. . . . . . . The result - a speck of dust was to focus. screen. and. . . splyl. . . . Benefits - removed it and at the same time convinced of the purity of the matrix. . . . .

10.09.2009 14:35:00
Acquired 450D KIT, which filter is best advised to take and whether it is worth taking?

10.09.2009 14:43:00
quote:
:
Acquired 450D KIT, which filter is best advised to take and whether it is worth taking?
Which filter you are interested in?
Yellow. oranevy, green, blue, red?
polarizing?
Conversion, skylight?
stellate? Misty? Soft?
Neutral? Gradient? Tobacco?
Ultraviolet? Security?

10.09.2009 15:45:00
UV protection and is simultaneously?
nuzhe filter for everyday use, te
Neutral UV Protective?

10.09.2009 16:10:00

and whether it is worth taking?

Well here opinions diverge (about a security).
strongly depends on the person with whom you live (children, wife) that you are going to shoot (extreme, rain and snow) in the desert (the Taliban, camels, pyramids), and so on. D., And so on. N.
I think better You will not be able to assess the need for everyday protection.
Protective Filter, even very good (at a price equal to the lens) - two extra optical surface. And therefore, more likely to catch rabbits.
Personally, I normally do not apply a filter, but it is always in your bag in case of a threat. Screw it - a snap.
Even spitting camel does not have time to fly. Although such situations can be predicted in advance.

10.09.2009 21:06:00
quote:
:
UV protection and is simultaneously?
UV is UV protective shield it. . .
quote:
nuzhe filter for everyday use, te
Neutral UV Protective?
neutral gray filter is different densities. It you want?

Why do you Ultraviolet digital camera?

e. It turns out you need protection. . . .

10.09.2009 21:56:00

I would Kit would not put a filter, but when the new lens - set, just understand what you need filter.

11.09.2009 9:46:00

which filter is better to take and whether it is worth taking?

The logic is simple:
cheap filter - danger degrade the picture is not worth taking, or take, but just putting on corporate
booze and expensive filter - at a price comparable to the whale, meaning, again, take no

I use whale without the protective glass, but with a blend

the other side of the road on the filter thread of 58mm can then be rearranged
to telephoto 55-250 fifty dollars or 1, 4, if their plans to buy

but in general, if you have money - buy circular polyarik, use a lot of summer and in the mountains, and so on. d.

11.09.2009 9:56:00


Why do you Ultraviolet digital camera?
e. It turns out you need protection. . . .

- For digital camera that UV, the protective - no difference. But UV is more common, more choice. So it is better to take as a UV protective.



I use a whale without a protective glass, but with a blend
- I also think it's optimum.

11.09.2009 10:23:00

I also think this is the optimum
depends on the conditions
if there are no preconditions dirtied the front lens - the filter is not particularly needed

11.09.2009 11:13:00
low-high: - /
let's get to specifics. . Marumi Super DHG Lens Protect 58mm / http: // pleer. ru / _16463. html is worth taking or not? if not strangle the toad and then what? ask the last question to answer specifically indicating the model and the advantages over Marumi Super DHG Lens Protect 58mm


whale without a protective glass, but with a blend
blend whales as disclosed. . . you know that: - / what with her a lot about the sense of protection?


11.09.2009 11:35:00

Hoya HD . Search Forums.

11.09.2009 11:42:00
I put the Uv filters Marum and Hoey all its lenses
not see deterioration, though filters and not expensive at 120 USD ($ 20 there)

11.09.2009 11:53:00

UV But more common, more choice. So it is better to take as a UV protective.
countries of the Council. . . . To perform certain functions take logical tool specially designed for this function, is not it?

If needed security, and then take the necessary protective, multiprosvetlёnny, antistatic and DROP coating.

11.09.2009 12:31:00
tell me what to 450D threshold run, offering camera with the number of shots for 40-50 thousand., Is it possible to face the problem of failure mechanics?
chamber year, still under warranty.

11.09.2009 12:46:00

chamber year, still under warranty. If
official guarantee, then another 1 year can shoot without worrying about the run as a free repair. The main thing that the camera did not fail at the crucial moment, but this possibility can not be ruled out for a run in the thousands of frames. Someone as lucky. . .

11.09.2009 12:46:00

Marumi Super DHG Lens Protect 58mm - I like that. Impairments do not see. Quite harmoniously work with the whale.


judging by the reviews / comments (Canon itself does not regulate the resiliency for xxxD) 50k - a threshold value for the shutter 450d.
 

11.09.2009 13:35:00

much for 450d
need to kill the gate for the year to free changed

11.09.2009 17:09:00

offer camera with the number of shots for 40-50 thousand.,
It is not always running shutter. The frame counter is easily cleared (see. Manual).
true mileage is determined by spec. program (link here somewhere given, I do not have).

11.09.2009 17:13:00

frame counter easily reset (see. Manual).
Here detail can be? ? ? ?

11.09.2009 20:20:00

110-111ye page paper Operating Instructions (included)

11.09.2009 20:37:00

you probably do not understand. . . need real kicker frame and not just zeroing tsiferek. . .
because the program without problems 450D_ShutterCount shows the current mileage

11.09.2009 20:37:00

Thank You and I in the country, there is no manual with it.

11.09.2009 20:41:00
quote:
:

110-111ye page paper Operating Instructions (included)
We're not talking about resetting the numbering of pictures speak. . . .

11.09.2009 20:45:00


kroshka_enot
offer camera with the number of shots for 40-50 thousand.,


We are here, in my opinion, was about the number of pictures. What I warned that this is not the equivalent mileage gate.
But for the name of a program, showing it running shutter thank you, I did not remember. As I understand it, ShutterCount, unlike the frame counter (t. E. Is the numbering of pictures in my mind), it just can not be reset.
Perhaps we parted in the terminology

11.09.2009 20:59:00

If needed security, and then take the necessary protective, multiprosvetlёnny, antistatic and DROP coating.
- to explain what is different from the protective filter UV, despite the fact that both with multi-coated. And why k-in UV filters a lot more than just protection? For example
:
http: // www. hoyafilter. com / products / hoya / gf-01. html
http: // www. hoyafilter. com / products / hoya / gf-03. html

11.09.2009 21:04:00

Put pliz 450D_ShutterCount

11.09.2009 21:31:00
Put pliz 450D_ShutterCount
and faq scroll? FAQ: Canon EOS 450D / Digital Rebel XSi Volume III - there is much more useful. .

utility for determining the amount of the shutter is released on Canon's Digic III processor and IV! ! !

11.09.2009 21:39:00

I put Uv filters Marum and Hoey all its lenses
not see deterioration, though filters and not expensive at 120 USD ($ 20 was)


I also initially put the cheapest Hoya, and so on for a long telephoto end of the range with the filter there is a noticeable deterioration in the picture - falls sharpness and blur doubles. At least 70-200 f / 4L so. Perhaps on a whale picture degradation almost unnoticed, although with a bad filter hares probably caught more and worse kept backlight. So I would not recommend cheap filters decent lenses. I am your cheap filters meanly gave away .

11.09.2009 21:43:00

speech here, I think, was about the number of pictures.

50,000 images? What numbering images can pass for 9999? But how?

11.09.2009 22:02:00

. . . not recommended cheap filters decent lenses.
well, it's about 20 dollars. . and what would you recommend, or even on another, you basely gave away cheap, and what was left of yourself? ?

11.09.2009 22:15:00

What numbering images can pass for 9999?
numbering within the same folder - no. But these folders can be 999.

11.09.2009 22:31:00

and what to leave yourself? ?

yet nothing lenses without a filter, but I try to use a lens hood. In the future I plan to still buy Hoya HMC or Hoya HMC Super - the only thing that has a decent stock of our village. And, of course, there are other options in terms of other firms. Important to notice the presence of the characteristics of the antireflective coating - more layers, the better.

11.09.2009 22:38:00

numbering within the same folder - no. But these folders can be 999.

And as the filename to understand what was otschelkano 50,000 frames?

11.09.2009 22:41:00

Why do you Ultraviolet digital camera?
Evidently, in order to cut off the ultraviolet part of the light flux. Or
ultraviolet, for whatever reason, avoid contact with obetivy CTF?


for digital cameras that UV, the protective - no matter
And why? Because protective filters include anti-UV coating or for some other reason?

11.09.2009 23:11:00

Because UV filter made sense on film, on the figure of a conventional protective enough. UV also amiss, but why pay more?

11.09.2009 23:16:00

ultraviolet rays, for whatever reason, avoid contact with obetivy CTF?

Because protective filters include anti-UV coating or for some other reason?

Unlike the "silver" films maximum sensitivity matrices lies in the infrared, ultraviolet, they malochustvitelny (from "silver" strictly vice versa).

11.09.2009 23:46:00

And as the name of the file to understand what was otschelkano 50,000 frames?
any way. Only from the words of the owner of the camera.
Asker, do not have a source of information.
I believe that when you buy it will be interesting to the true mileage of the shutter.

12.09.2009 0:47:00

any way. Only from the words of the owner of the camera.

So I think that only ShutterCount.

12.09.2009 3:00:00

for digital cameras that UV, the protective - no matter
And why?

- Because before the matrix are UV and IR filters.
 

12.09.2009 12:42:00

- Because before the matrix are UV and IR filters.
Never heard of UV before the matrix.

FAQ: Canon EOS 450D / Digital Rebel XSi Volume III

info@www.about-digital-photo.com