FAQ: Canon EOS 450D / Digital Rebel XSi Volume III


16.03.2009 9:17:00

Who has any installation on the 450D with whale obyaktivom
I STANDARD style, and the rest, if necessary, in the shop. For the life of me fits in almost all cases.
professional portrait is not rented.
When taking pictures of flowers (well, I have a hobby ) - RAW + jpeg exclusively with the control histogram. There is often one of the channels, depending on the color of the flower is overloaded by more than to allow pull RAW. So it is necessary to introduce originally exposure compensation.
 

16.03.2009 9:26:00
quote:
:
I do not mean equal say! ! ! and about jpg. . . . Rav does not suit me for personal reasons
Why then if SLR equal to not use, so I pulled out the last picture, which was a pity to delete in dzhipeg of it would simply be one color noise, and hence the photo shopping cart at once without even trying to revive her .
And what such considerations, if not secret?

16.03.2009 9:42:00

Rav does not suit me for personal reasons
I also did not come for personal reasons (Pride and Prejudice (c)).
And then I tried again, and somehow he came so softly, like a fine cognac.

16.03.2009 9:45:00
quote:
:

repeat the question to you: you do not Convery in jpeg?
Usually TIFF to JPEG then, but as it applies to the original question?

quote:
:
prankster
I was in these settings once - after buying the camera ran through all menues for review. . . that there should of course I do not remember.

16.03.2009 10:02:00
for whatever your reasons, it is not suitable?

16.03.2009 10:06:00

for whatever your reasons, it is not suitable?
Duc, I wrote - Pride and Prejudice (c)
Pride - was too lazy to learn
Prejudice - that he does not need me nafig
Both - own stupidity, I confess

16.03.2009 10:09:00
Well it's good when you shoot little by little. . . . . and if you took about tyshi! ! ! ! ! and everyone in dzhepeg translate

16.03.2009 10:12:00

here yesterday I drew this picture, which was a pity to delete in dzhipeg of it would simply be one color noise
I often thought so too, and then it turns out that of the soap dish zhpeg able to pull more

16.03.2009 10:12:00
quote:
:
well, it's good when you shoot little by little. . . . . and if you took about tyshi! ! ! ! ! and everyone in dzhepeg translate
"Sunset manually" ©? You
them personally that the envelopes pixel by pixel?

16.03.2009 10:13:00

way in RAW noise is not beautiful. . . videmo because squelch does not work. . . then remove this noise is needed! ! ! which is not very gud

not understand you =))) What pix)) so you shutkuete? sunset and here?


16.03.2009 10:17:00
quote:
:
Question: Who has any installation on the 450D with whale obyaktivom:
1. Sharpness
2. Contrast
3.
4. Saturation Hue
? ? ?

normal and can only be removed in the raw. .

16.03.2009 10:18:00

about tyshi! ! ! ! ! and everyone in dzhepeg translate
And that all - masterpieces?
I, where necessary, shoot in RAW + jpeg. Most RAVov remain in the archive without conversion (for history). Converts only masterpieces worthy to be shown to future generations.

16.03.2009 10:21:00

of equal need only remove the chroma noise (blue-green stain)
luminance climbs only ISO 800-1600, and 800 can not remove

16.03.2009 10:21:00
you do not believe at all the masterpieces button masterpiece there =))))

16.03.2009 10:22:00

Rav does not suit me for personal reasons
my first identity Rav did not come from personal considerations but once tasted all its charms, clearly only equal! and personal reasons are converted to jpeg already as I like. .

16.03.2009 10:23:00

videmo because squelch does not work.
Are you able RAV without converting to consider?
A converter has a squelch settings as desired

16.03.2009 10:26:00

Are you able RAV without converting to consider?
what you want to say?

16.03.2009 10:27:00
quote:
:

way in RAW noise is not beautiful. . . videmo because squelch does not work. . . then remove this noise is needed! ! ! which is not very gud
Hmm. . . . This excuse can see for the first time - an original.
quote:
not understand you =)))
Poor.
quote:
any pix)) so you shutkuete? sunset and here?
I wanted to ask you convert RAW-s hand proschityvaya each pixel on the calculator using the algorithm Bayer or vsyotaki it for you makes a computer in batch mode? If the latter, then I do not understand the meaning of the exclamation "a thousand envelopes".

16.03.2009 10:27:00
You them personally that the envelopes pixel by pixel?
+1


of zhpeg soap dish managed to pull much
do not argue, it is possible, but Rav even simpler and more. . correct-that is, the result. .


came as gently as good cognac
very finely observed and most importantly - correctly. .


16.03.2009 10:33:00

Are you able RAV without converting to consider?
I know how! and you do not?

you too much shooting? or just say what they say is not much. . .


16.03.2009 10:35:00

shoot in RAW + jpeg
I'd rather wait then the extra 10 minutes at a conversion than scoring stick debris jpeg-ohm. .

16.03.2009 10:35:00
Why then SLR equal if not to use
Well, as it is easier than soap SLR to shoot some scenes. For example, young children.

But personally, I shoot in RAW yet. Recently .
And now I have a problem with the free space on the HDD

16.03.2009 10:37:00

me to the fact that many people believe that from zhpega nothing can be done
yes, bb of Rabbi general elementary
done but everything else from zhpega, albeit with poorer quality, but you can
I'm not saying there - pull on 3 foot

And now I have a problem with the free space on the HDD
erase junk did not try? or all of the masterpieces of the rod


16.03.2009 10:39:00

have a problem with the free space on the HDD
better to buy a screw on the 320GB, they are now at very reasonable prices and offers a couple of boxes of DVD-ROM drive, than to bite his elbow on what you've done in his youth. .

16.03.2009 10:45:00
yes I say to you that all masterpieces sposhnye

from jpg everything is fine, you can pull! lizhby head with Photoshop work!

16.03.2009 10:46:00
erase junk did not try? or all of the masterpieces of the rod
you're so vain: - / I personally feel sorry that's so easy to wash. . except that any series of the same. . and a couple of screws and DVD discs do not ask to eat. .
 

16.03.2009 10:47:00

better to buy a screw on the 320GB, they are now at very reasonable prices and offers a couple of boxes of DVD-ROM drive, than to bite his elbow on what you've done in his youth. .
agree. Therefore became RAW use. First RAW + JPG tried it, but places on the flash drive felt sorry

16.03.2009 10:50:00

duck it is a pity, but then I still will not watch and do not even remember what was on the photos
soapbox so I took off, nothing would erase
think and regularly reviewed?

16.03.2009 10:51:00

jpg can be pulled out!
can, of course, who would argue, but not as elegantly as of Rav. .

16.03.2009 10:55:00
means a lot you shedevrav was. . . . and perhaps to you mylnetse button masterpiece nebilo

16.03.2009 10:56:00
think and regularly reviewed?
I obsessed with beautiful pictures. . I have a program - it every 3 minutes. I wallpaper changes, and from time to time taking pictures of the folders with photos taken a few years ago, you have no idea how interesting and impressive recall some and when I have time, and is the original from which it is possible to play mmmm. . .

16.03.2009 10:57:00
such a program has also =)

16.03.2009 10:58:00

raimon you too much shooting? or just say what they say is not much. . .
I just know how to convert RAW-s packet.

16.03.2009 11:00:00
where does the packet. . . skazhdym need to work individually! and if not then why Rabbi!

16.03.2009 11:11:00
quote:
: drew this picture, which was a pity to delete in dzhipeg of it would simply be one color noise, and hence the photo to Trash
Why get photos in which no particular mode of converting a noise? Why can not immediately take a picture with the correct settings?

16.03.2009 11:15:00
But there is a topic - RAW vs JPEG

16.03.2009 11:28:00

Are you able RAV without converting to consider?
what you want to say?

I would like to say that even to see some prog converts. And it may not be the most successful, hence the noise.


Are you able RAV without converting to consider?
I know how! and you do not?

Alas, woe is me. . .


think and regularly reviewed?
spices like Lapshin recommend that from time to time to deal with. . .
From personal experience, sometimes suddenly shydevr gets out.


Why can not immediately take a picture with the correct settings?
I do not have a vehicle, for example, ISO 3200 or 6400. .


16.03.2009 11:37:00
quote:
:
where does the packet. . . skazhdym need to work individually!
Then why did you shoot in JPEG if you need to work individually with each?

16.03.2009 11:55:00

But there is a topic - RAW vs JPEG
I believe that the ultimate truth is creatively captured, treated as creatively and imaginatively same photo printed on paper.
Many photographers past and present with it, seems to agree.
Everything else - is nothing more than the kitchen, where each family own recipe borscht that others are unlikely to be repeated.
We appreciate result

16.03.2009 11:57:00
that's all right man said! ! ! Komuto RAW is essential for good ending! and who is and jpg enough! you need to look individually!
It began then what? remember all together! ! ! here's how:
Question: Who has any installation on the 450D with whale obyaktivom:
1. Sharpness
2. Contrast
3.
4. Saturation Hue
? ? ?

16.03.2009 12:01:00
quote:
:
I often thought so too, but then it turns out that both of zhpeg soap dish managed to pull much
agree, if it Rav not, do so myself, t. To. Picture sorry

quote:
:
Why get photos in which no particular mode of converting a noise? Why can not immediately take a picture with the correct settings?
Well, it's a separate issue, the causes of weight: a little experience (do not take into account all the features), and there was little time shooting without flash to the child's eyes as not to spoil (but I only have built-in), and the light in the room only a little luster, and even in backlit, shutter speed is not set, the hole will not open for another max DOF small and a lot of soap, so it was a lot of pictures, you can say all of the same type and "neponravivshiesya to cart", and it is not important, that is. a. all at home I think shooting gallery in 90% of the basket, this is a plus and figures, and of t. e. can talk about it endlessly, but the main thing is not to say sovershensvovatsya having this knowledge!

16.03.2009 12:10:00

Who has any installation on the 450D
By the way, the latest version of ACR (5. 2), in the lower right pane, in the third tab where fotik drawn, open the drop-down list of all the styles of the camera (not only said what). Simple buckling can see how the image changes and the histogram depending on the selected style.
Perhaps this chip was in earlier versions, simply did not notice.

16.03.2009 12:13:00
about such heard. . . . we can not attentive

16.03.2009 12:20:00
quote:
:
in the third tab where fotik drawn, open the drop-down list of all the styles of the camera (not only said what).
I was puzzled by this question over the weekend and found that the profiles are all I have, but not Photoshop CS3 or laytrum 2. 3R does not offer them to choose, I think he takes from the Old eksif and immediately selects the desired profile and adjusts your camera, because downloaded me with adobe profiles were older, this beta 1 and 2 of August and October, and I stand December, and another about these profiles in the internet I could not find anything, can anyone knows!

16.03.2009 12:28:00

in lightroom can choose profile

16.03.2009 12:31:00
the latest version of ACR (5. 2)

about such heard.
This converter RAV for Photoshop and Elements.
http: // www. adobe. com / products / photoshop / cameraraw. html
turns out, is already available version 5. 3

16.03.2009 12:41:00
quote:
:
in lightroom, you can select the profile
yes, there also is a drop down menu where the exposure slider

quote:
:
turns out, is already available version 5. 3
only for AL 2, 3 and AP CS4

16.03.2009 14:15:00

By the way, the latest version of ACR (5. 2)
5. 3

open the drop-down list of all the styles of the camera (not only said what)
That which belongs RAW

Perhaps this chip was in earlier versions, simply did not notice.
was only profiles cameras were not.


16.03.2009 15:00:00
Usually TIFF to JPEG then, but as it applies to the original question?
But you must specify the settings listed? What kind of setting such a "do not know"? Default?
 

16.03.2009 16:32:00
quote:
:
Usually TIFF to JPEG then, but as it applies to the original question?
But you must specify the settings listed? What kind of setting such a "do not know"? Default?
Hmm. . . Well, if so put the question
quote:
1. Sharpness
Amount 25
Radius 1
Detail 25

usually. . .

quote:
2. Contrast
+25 - +35 Usually

quote:
3. Saturation
Saturation 0
Vibrance +8 - +12

quote:
4 . Hue
Depends on BB, of course.

But I still do not understand how my settings AdobeCameraRAW are settings of the camera?

FAQ: Canon EOS 450D / Digital Rebel XSi Volume III

info@www.about-digital-photo.com