FAQ: Canon EOS 450D / Digital Rebel XSi Volume III


05.03.2009 9:09:00
Red-eye reduction lamp and the truth is not necessary, and without it there is no red-eye (or rather if the eyes appear light could not cope).

by the way, tried to flash canon-580-2.
home the shot at the ceiling, at ISO 100 the power is not hvatatet (20m sq. M., Height 2, 7m)
 

05.03.2009 9:15:00

can you worth noise reduction at high shutter speeds,
yes, there is. . and earlier firmware 1. 0. 4 of these delays were not. . WMS-t and noise reduction while not really performed

off and forget it!
100%

05.03.2009 9:31:00
if there is "on", it is always shumodava if longer than 1 sec. speed does not depend on the firmware, the second time holds almost as much as it was during the shooting of seconds.

but in principle there is an inaccuracy:
eg denoising at high ISO. but it works, it always! so would call - denoising.

05.03.2009 9:31:00

by the way. . . canon-580-2. . . the shot at the ceiling, at ISO 100 the power is not hvatatet. . .
And why the ceiling to illuminate the photographer? 45 degrees and will be fine.

05.03.2009 9:38:00

basically there inaccuracy
a-ha, he clearly triggered and 100 ISO had no qualms. .

05.03.2009 9:40:00
45 degrees in the frame beam hits the flash verhznyuyu of the frame. at 60-75 you can still put - better. but so, too, is not enough. to ISO-200 already has considerable headroom. t. e to ISO-100 quite a bit lacking.

charged almost instantaneously to 2 seconds. on the new rechargeable battery.

general shikarnyya flash, but:
1. heavy
2. large.
these days will be a test at the event.

05.03.2009 9:43:00

the same as it was when shooting seconds
I understand correctly, it holds within itself and it handles, ie the camera at this time can be moved?

the way, yesterday I never waited for him to finish the formation of the so-called dark frame, and immediately pressed the preview button after the shooting mode, and therefore all the bugs are likely. . yet, now I hesitated when shooting with the old firmware on long exposures: - / likely denoising was not then included. . .

05.03.2009 9:53:00
Yes, after the shooting, the camera closes the curtain on the same time.

about shumodava: by default, they kind of were included. you mean they themselves had to shut down once on the old firmware.

05.03.2009 10:07:00
quote:
:
I read somewhere that the 1/30 shutter speed (close to the frame rate in a movie) is most naturally conveys the perception of sharpness human rights (and probably other objects eststvennoy nature).

Something very mysterious saying.
Although, come to think of and to clarify that the statement will be true "exposure such update time the visual image on the retina more accurately conveys the feeling of a moving object than the much smaller and much more."
mean it?

05.03.2009 10:07:00
Thank you for your answers! wanted, of course, a little book in his hands to hold - materiel to study in a spare moment! ! ! )))
nobody takes on not autofocus lenses? where to read the Old and where to get the adapter and Canon limpusa mechanics on the 450th?

05.03.2009 10:19:00

nobody takes on not autofocus lenses? where to read the Old and where to get the adapter and Canon limpusa mechanics on the 450th?
Neavtofokusnye lenses on the figure
For the first time should be enough disk imaging


I understand correctly, it holds within itself and it handles, ie the camera at this time can be moved?
It removes noises inside their own matrix with the same exposure, and then subtracts it from the original frame.
device can move - the shutter is closed. But hinder the process, eagerly pressing any buttons, not worth it.
better at this time to think about the next frame

05.03.2009 12:47:00

eagerly pressing any buttons, do not
not argue

05.03.2009 12:51:00

additional squelch does not always work, but only if it is included, called high ISO
it is easy to check, because when you turn significantly decreases the buffer capacity and speed series


seems that the camera has a turn of events, and when you press to obtain a view image, the apparatus performs an action to write a frame, and opens the previous


05.03.2009 12:56:00

camera has all the events and when you press the preview button to obtain a frame, the device performs this action before using the camera, and opens the previous
certainly true. .

06.03.2009 5:20:00
KM-300
I meant that if the squelch is enabled, it pushes always, and not only at high ISO.

checked canon flash-580-2 at the event.
kindergarten, the ceiling of 3 meters, max. distance of 20 meters.

the ceiling, it makes sense to beat if ISO-400 and the distance of 5 meters. if 10 meters, it is already necessary to ISO-800.

forehead beats confidently across the hall to the ISO-200. but the shadows - Kick.
the ceiling is always on the beat max. power on the forehead put +2/3, +1 EV.

eventually (quite sensibly) was bright pictures. I hope in the DPP reduce exposure to normal and at the same time to reduce the noise from ISO-400. overbrights like was not on their faces. you get?

question:
as DPP in the dark places of the frame to make lighter and darker light?
example, the background is normal, and people in the foreground light. like not killing the background (reducing exposure DPP background darkens with persons) to get a balanced picture. Photo in RAV without overbrights.

06.03.2009 7:31:00

somehow very wisely. And whether it is necessary so to be perverted? I doubt that after such manipulations pictures delight.

06.03.2009 9:13:00

In DPP has ekspodiagramma curve, so that's at the bottom right and top left there I will say this stops (with triangles at the ends), grab them with the mouse and move to your taste and look for a compromise fear sometimes it can be found.

06.03.2009 9:36:00
And in my opinion DPP terribly awkward interface, so I use a mixture of Photoshop, Lightroom and silkypix, t. To. Only by using a combination of software pictures pleasing to the eye. Here's decided to learn Photoshop Elements, for a simple correction, we'll see what happens.

06.03.2009 9:40:00

And in my DPP terribly awkward interface

If you are shooting set all the parameters and want a quick look konvertnut all - DPP good option (+ free)


therefore use a mixture of Photoshop, Lightroom and silkypix

Try C1 Pro 4. 6

06.03.2009 10:39:00

postavte lightroom, there are individual sliders for light, shadow, bright light and deep shadows

06.03.2009 10:40:00
I have reason to Kepcha Ouen Pro (latest) neponyatki out if a DPP and Laytrumom result is predictable, then C1 pictures obtained with dark brown haze that. Selecting a profile does not Adob ​​RSL saves a little picture, with the screen can be seen at first seems to be OK, and it forms dzhpeg fic know how. If necessary, I can not be unfounded and make steam "development with" a different prog.

06.03.2009 12:13:00

then C1 pictures obtained with dark brown haze that.

in my gallery with all C1

06.03.2009 12:17:00
Well, it will dig into what's going on. .

06.03.2009 12:35:00

Try C1 Pro 4. 6
no less terrible than the DPP

06.03.2009 12:38:00

no less terrible than the DPP

What? I believe that he has no weaknesses. Comp №1 in info. :)

06.03.2009 12:44:00
quote:
:

somehow very wisely. And whether it is necessary so to be perverted? I doubt that after such manipulations pictures delight.
Monsieur theorist?


What?
interface.

 

06.03.2009 12:54:00

interface.

best interface in the world, everything is clear and handy

Even levels in 2 clicks you can edit

06.03.2009 13:05:00
raimon
not know about Nicholas and myself say this: Photoshop zanirmalsya, but these will handle your photos without photoshop.
know that Photoshop can only change the brightness of light or dark. and there's plenty of options, and the field can be identified,

but now I have to do it only in the DPP.
yes, sliders curve in the tab "RAW" to move, but somehow did not get akukuratno. if in no other way DPP not, I will try to make these polzunkai max. possible.

first darken the exposure -2/3 (ie. A. While shooting set +2/3), then try to pull the shade / person).
if I do not go in the storontsu, tell, I will not waste time on redaktirvoanie.
not a lot of pictures. 20-30 pieces. most only need to tweak the BB.

06.03.2009 13:11:00
quote:
:

interface.

best interface in the world, everything is clear and handy
Amazingly unfriendly, non-intuitive, cluttered, clumsy with an incomprehensible logic interface depressive ugly color. . .

Several times I tried to make myself understand - could not for the soul to the gate. . . .

Almost the same thing with me and with LR.

06.03.2009 13:11:00

e'll spend time redaktirvoanie.
not a lot of pictures. 20-30 pieces. most only need to tweak the BB.


I told glyatte C1. In your case:

1) If the pictures from one place - all dressed 20-30 gallery again.

2) on the first poke pipette BB + adjustable Expo levels, shadows, light / curves

3) click to copy settings

4) shift + click the button "make zhipeg"

After 5 minutes, get ready pictures


could not because of the soul with the gate. . . .

1. Are you sure the fourth version of the tried?

2. Type ACR + Photoshop better?


06.03.2009 13:15:00

but now I have to do it only in the DPP.
for fun? On a bet? Fealty?

in ACR have curves, sliders got some of the curves, there is a "Rekoveri" and "Phil Light" - I personally quite enough. . .

quote:
:

could not because of the soul with the gate. . . .

1. Are you sure the fourth version of the tried?
I have them since the second try from time to time. . .

quote:
2. Type ACR + Photoshop better?
course.

06.03.2009 13:23:00

course.

So there is still a curve interface - you first need to poke in the ACR, and then in the PN. and so with each file. Uzhos.

06.03.2009 13:28:00
quote:
:

course.

So there is still a curve interface
interface there is clear to me, convenient and logical
quote:
- you first need to poke in the ACR, and then in the PN. and so with each file. Uzhos.
If the file does not require editing after conversion of why his ship in Photoshop? ? ? ?

06.03.2009 13:29:00
I will do in the DPP because of extreme need. PC is that there is nothing.

I'll specifically ask:
in DPP:
1. return to the place of exposure (+2/3 EV was shot in a flash).
2. without touching the exposure to darken or lighten the foreground back.

that's all. please advise.
by the way, I noticed that the DPP can not rotate when cropping frame (to straighten the horizon). horror.

06.03.2009 13:32:00

If the file does not require editing after conversion of why his ship in Photoshop? ? ? ?

And if you need it?

06.03.2009 13:36:00
quote:
:

If the file does not require editing after conversion of why his ship in Photoshop? ? ? ?

And if you need it?
Then his ship and so in Photoshop that after C1, after the DPP, that after ACR, (ACR one of the buttons).

06.03.2009 13:39:00
you accidentally branch not mistaken?

06.03.2009 13:44:00

Then his ship and so in Photoshop that after C1

Not the fact is, the adjustment in the C1, which is not in the ACR, but there is in Photoshop - such as levels

06.03.2009 13:47:00
I asked a short question and if the answer here is clearly the case in two or three responses, then the off-topics would not be. Now of course went offtopic. answer my question and debated by ACR, LR, PS, DPP and compare them is not necessary.

06.03.2009 13:51:00
quote:
:

Then his ship and so in Photoshop that after C1

Not the fact is, the adjustment in the C1, which is not in the ACR, but there is in Photoshop - such as levels
This particular .

06.03.2009 13:57:00

as DPP in the dark places of the frame to make lighter and darker light?
example, the background is normal, and people in the foreground light. like not killing the background (reducing exposure DPP background darkens with persons) to get a balanced picture. Photo in RAV without overbrights.


When shooting with the flash enough to put ISO400 or ISO800. Then worked brighter background. This will reduce the contrast of the image.

Software you can try to save a snapshot using:
a) reduce the contrast in RAW conversion, followed by reduction of the local contrast in Adobe Photoshop (or other software);
b) Operation Shadow / Highlight in Adobe Photoshop (or other software);
c) the imposition of a copy of the layer mode to Screen with masking bright parts of an image in Adobe Photoshop (or other software).

upd.


This will explain just in case. As far as I understood from the description of the problem, you have done a very contrasting picture and you want to "pull" the shadows, without damaging the local contrast. Mojo is a very strong and single RAW converter means it does not.

If you do not want to use for image processing tone mapping software or by means of local adjustments Adobe Photoshop, then you need to reduce the contrast of the scene when shooting.


06.03.2009 14:13:00
quote:
:
going to do in the DPP because of extreme need. PC is that there is nothing.

I'll specifically ask:
in DPP:
1. return to the place of exposure (+2/3 EV was shot in a flash).
2. without touching the exposure to darken or lighten the foreground back.

that's all. please advise.
by the way, I noticed that the DPP can not rotate when cropping frame (to straighten the horizon). horror.
I would have to start back exposure to 0 and has to play it. And only then can move slightly and in one way or another. With your approach is consistent try. The future poyuzat C1 is really cool prog. Use or DPP or her. Very rarely Photoshop, this is when it is necessary to work with layers or delicately shumodava.
Yes, I can still recommend surpass all problematic photos in jpeg and then fix the light in the shadows \\ ACDSee Pro 2. 5, where it has the advanced mode and it \\ Shading lights in it as three tabs I use the middle Light EQ ( on the first tab there is a button auto). The easiest and fastest way to vivid with the best result.


And what version you have installed? And be sure to check the settings \\ Properties monitor what color space you should (color management). C1 works well with sRGB. . . . . . .

quote:
:
quote:
:

interface.

best interface in the world, everything is clear and handy
Amazingly unfriendly, non-intuitive, cluttered, clumsy with an incomprehensible logic interface depressive ugly color. . .

Several times I tried to make myself understand - could not for the soul to the gate. . . .

Almost the same thing with me and with LR.
As written as described then. . . zhzhosh!

06.03.2009 21:22:00
Dear I have more than once pointed out about the incorrect display of colors in Lightroom, in response to that you said to me more than once to put the profiles from Adobe, the existence of which I know better than you. . . I've tested all of the Lightroom software is the most convenient. . . I have repeatedly raised the topic of color correction in this topic and the topic for LR. People themselves create profiles, but under 40D and 50Di result surpassed profiles from Adobe, moreover, they offered their help in creating a profile for 450D. . . If, however, someone care about this topic, please help. . . Thank U

06.03.2009 21:35:00
on Raw and konyektorah can ever say. . . . but that's what everyone thinks. . . . and how this can be. . . .
F11 sharper than the F22. . . . . generally is heard but even so does not fit with the theory

06.03.2009 21:40:00

F11 sharper than the F22. . . . . generally is heard but even so does not fit with the theory
Why does not fit? After about F16 sharpness (not to be confused with the depth of field) begins to fall.

06.03.2009 21:54:00

sharpness for the camera with a pixel size as in 450d, starts to fall already at f / 9, and 16 already is natural soaps
- diffraction
here for 5d with this better

though not very sharp lens, not so much

06.03.2009 23:13:00

problem of incorrect display of color in laytrum latest versions do not. There is a problem of incorrect setup and monitors. And this one will not help if the person is sure that he has everything set up correctly. Personally, I have the color in laytrum, FN and the DPP is transmitted the same way. In laytrume, the DPP and the camera profile exhibited camera standard. Color space everywhere sRGB.

07.03.2009 8:33:00
I photographed the snow and the snow turned bought three colors pink, green, and pink. . . . . . (Directly and is not visible unless you look closely) and well manifested in Photoshop! ! it's what's the matter be? ? ? Other photographs were not not that similar. . . . .
 

07.03.2009 8:55:00

In the open field shot, or were close objects, buildings and so on. N., Painted in any color?

FAQ: Canon EOS 450D / Digital Rebel XSi Volume III

info@www.about-digital-photo.com