What Shirikov choose: Tokina 12-24 mm F / 4 or Tamron SP AF 17-50 F / 2. 8

Pages: 1

18.11.2008 17:05:00
For carcass Canon 40D need glass with wide angle. Aperture is of fundamental importance, but at the moment there is already a complete 28-70 / 2. 8 L, therefore Range 12-24 vygljadet preferable. Are the glass about the same - about 550 $
are primarily interested in the opinion of the owners. Alternatives can be offered, but without fanaticism - the budget is short.
 

18.11.2008 17:36:00
Frankly it is not clear how to choose between them, the windows of different ranges.

18.11.2008 17:54:00
Sigma 10-20mm f / 4-5. 6 EX DC HSM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras

For all the tests Shirikov is unique among the other competitors. I am going to take it.

18.11.2008 18:02:00

That suffer Shooting in osnomnom, reportage. 28-70 / 2. 8 L arranges for speed, luminosity and drawing, but desperately need a wide angle, even from 17mm.
now the main criteria focus speed and quality. Choose one of the glass like a 5 sigma is not desirable.


This lens 18 thousand. Rubles is about us, that is. E. At 3, 5 thousand more expensive than Tamron and Tokin. + Aperture less. + This sigma, I'm afraid I can not normally check when buying.


18.11.2008 20:36:00
Tokin 11-16 / 2. 8
rented at the Sigma 10-20 range and the quality is good, but temnotaaaaa. . .

18.11.2008 20:41:00
I tokinovsky 11-16, no complaints, except that a little too heavy and zoom. . . but I do not range, I need to 11mm:)

If English friends, look here:

http: // www. kenrockwell. com / tech / digital-wide-zooms / comparison. htm


18.11.2008 21:20:00
Probably I put one (until absentia) for Tokin 11-16. In absentia, because I can not find alive, poshupat. . . But F2. 8 - hard. If overt stocks will not - it will be my next objective.

18.11.2008 21:23:00
And here is a visual comparison with the Nikon 12-24:

http: // www. kenrockwell. com / tokina / 11-16mm. htm

18.11.2008 21:52:00
That's all fine, but Tokina 11-16 / 2. 8 250-300 bucks more. Thanks for the link. It is aimed at 12-24.
 

18.11.2008 22:03:00
Hmm, yes, there is a problem. . .

18.11.2008 22:25:00

I feel, pretty, yes. . . but expensive infection. . .
at this angle and the aperture ratio can be no motion blur to shoot almost always .

18.11.2008 22:35:00

Yes, with hands on 1/5 seconds almost all of the frames are obtained sharply.

19.11.2008 6:56:00
Native 10-22 in the budget laid? It will be better Tokin 12-24 and Sigma 10-20.

19.11.2008 8:15:00
Belial_68: What Shirikov choose: Tokina 12-24 mm F / 4 or Tamron SP AF 17-50 F / 2. 8

take immediately sigma 12-24 HSM, then to quietly rearrange 5D

19.11.2008 10:39:00
quote:
:
take immediately sigma 12-24 HSM
sprinkled on the Sigma totally meaningless - a healthy, honey, dark.
 

19.11.2008 11:21:00
quote:
:
quote:
:
take immediately sigma 12-24 HSM
sprinkled on the Sigma totally meaningless - a healthy, honey, dark.

+1
Pages: 1

What Shirikov choose: Tokina 12-24 mm F / 4 or Tamron SP AF 17-50 F / 2. 8

info@www.about-digital-photo.com