DSLR for a beginner: the subtleties of choice, tips for buying,. . .

Pages: 1

13.08.2008 18:57:00
I want to buy a SLR camera, but it's hard to decide.

I want to control was manual. Rings with a bunch of modes such as "portrait" is not needed. Possibility of the most convenient expansion chamber (that is not very expensive components). Ease of use and consistency of attitudes.

What will take pictures: landscapes, city streets, in short, the photo on the go.

Can I take Pentax, or is it completely useless?

Waiting for advice!
 

13.08.2008 19:37:00
There are a bunch of information and so on, sorry for the taffeta. It is not necessary to produce that. Use search.
PS. My advice is take-450D and do not worry. To begin with a good camera, if the arm will fall. If not
-40ket. Pile-optics-create do not want to!

13.08.2008 19:54:00
If well appear the words "not very expensive components," then surely for the adequacy councils should indicate the estimated budget For the word and relatively inexpensively provide a very tangible wishbone prices

13.08.2008 21:15:00

Can I take Pentax, or is it completely useless? Who whispered to you the STE? Like the Pentax (Samsung) just positioned to capture peyzazheportretov thoughtful. . . And so difficult to say what is better and what is worse. Right now all byudzhetki differ more in religion than in quality. . . First you need to hold the camera in a shop in the hands, and then make the first conclusions. . .

13.08.2008 21:28:00

Rings with a bunch of modes such as "portrait"

nikon D200 - a professional camera without such conditions on the ring, and stands today is not expensive
+ 12-24 / 4 - landscapes, city streets, in short, photo travel

1
2

b / y in the new state will cost you 42-44tysyachi if the lens of tokin and 10-12 more expensive, if Nikon. The quality is almost the same if

write in the mail or private, where to take your finger tknu

13.08.2008 23:09:00
quote:
:
I want to control was manual. Rings with a bunch of modes such as "portrait" is not needed. Possibility of the most convenient expansion chamber (that is not very expensive components). Ease of use and consistency of attitudes.
What will take pictures: landscapes, city streets, in short, a photo on the go. Can I take
Pentax, or is it completely useless?
Waiting for advice!
all SLRs have a manual mode. Some have an additional scene modes, handy when you have to let it use the kettle. Worse than the availability of DSC plots are not.
Usability - a relative term. You're big and heavy to lay in his hand and did not twitch, or a small and light to carry all day?
not very expensive components do not give very good quality. And in general, SLR - very expensive. Tripod expensive, more expensive bag, large file - card must take more lenses not cheap.
can take and PENTAX. How can you claim any SLR better soap dish. But if you put a cheap glass - quality will be moderate. You can put the fix - the quality is excellent, comfort will suffer.
LiveView need? Then look at the new models canon 450D is optimal from cheap, its advantages - a good whale are low value sd, Olympus double whale - inexpensive and two lens cover most of the needs of the traveler, its disadvantage - relatively more noise from the small matrix.
not necessary - you can look at the old models.

In general - and take the probe.
 

13.08.2008 23:27:00

Rings with a bunch of modes such as "portrait" is not needed.

And what's so terrible about them? When it is necessary in the second act, it is possible kerf "plot." They prescribe more or less tolerated in modern cameras. And even more so if there is a daily practice of playing the "accordion" on the buttons pro-carcasses, it is the only way for an amateur to extreme operating personnel. Athletes won many workouts in the week? And You? When the last run made?

14.08.2008 0:10:00

have kenona then cuts off equal, and we have to think about installing the correct bb. ultimately saving time turns negative.

14.08.2008 0:22:00

its minus - relatively more noise from the small matrix This statement is obsolete since the models of the E-420. Matrix less Kenonovskoy only 10% if Kenononovskuyu kropnutyh on the long side with 3: 2 to 4: 3 is another matter ratio of 3: 2 is better for pyzazhey and 4: 3 for portraits. . .

14.08.2008 0:59:00

Matrix less Kenonovskoy only 10%
original arithmetic.
E420:
17. 3 x 13. 0 mm
11. 8 million total pixels
10. 0 million effective pixels
total 225mm ^ 2 of which are used by 85% - 191mm ^ 2

1000D:
10. 1 million effective pixels
10. 5 million total pixels
22. 2 x 14. 8 mm CMOS sensor
total 328mm ^ 2 of which are used by 96% - 315mm ^ 2

315/191 = 1. 65/1. 125 ("if kropnutyh to 4: 3") = 1. 10 47. Interest%
 

14.08.2008 1:15:00

have kenona then cuts off equal, and we have to think about installing the correct bb. ultimately saving time turns negative.

Yeah, are no back-up. .
(What there is a real problem with korretsiey Auto WB?? Dzhpeg in. Maybe the problem somewhat flimsy, taking into account the value of the captured frame quickly - it was originally a valuable plot, and secondarily in other categories)
Pages: 1

DSLR for a beginner: the subtleties of choice, tips for buying,. . .

info@www.about-digital-photo.com