Nikon D80 vs. Sony Alpha A-100: pure pragmatism or compare without fanaticism


09.08.2006 14:09:00
Today, finally became known official specifications Nikon D80. About Sony Alpha A-100 is known even more.
problem sabzhevoy choice for many will be relevant.
I suggest in this thread to compare a set of technical characteristics of both chambers to discuss tests, reviews, testimonials and samples.

news about D80 on our website for those who are not friendly to the English.
 

09.08.2006 14:11:00
without fanaticism will come

09.08.2006 14:14:00
Clean water provokaTsyya. But as an outside observer - Sonia at the same price outright merges constructive, functional and a set of optics. If the difference in the 250-300 dollars - on a par.

09.08.2006 14:16:00

But Sony has one distinct advantage - the stabilizer. . .

09.08.2006 14:16:00

so what is there to discuss - the same story as with the cameras on 6 megapixel matrix Sony,
only this 10 megapixel matrix worse. . .
's all business. . .
major differences in quality housing, functional and viewfinder,
plus Nikon have a huge choice of optics and the carcass even where. . .
and the end result will be somewhere close. . .

09.08.2006 14:17:00

But the choice anyway is not that easy and unambiguous. . .

09.08.2006 14:18:00

functionality merges Nikon. ergonimika question.
constructive and cat - yes. and this will cause a drop in prices for Alpha
and force Sony to release S7D mark II )

09.08.2006 14:19:00

But Sony has one distinct advantage - the stabilizer. . .

not one and a half - from Nikon glass stabilized.

09.08.2006 14:19:00
Personally, I think that the lens AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 18-135mm f / 3. 5-5. 6G IF-ED in the whale - it is the right course of Nikon! But
price. . .
300 bucks for it to pay extra glass not much like it. . .

09.08.2006 14:19:00

functionality merges Nikon.
In what place?

09.08.2006 14:20:00

In what place?
in place stabilizer.

09.08.2006 14:21:00
Started.
Again, the battle begins, and the heart of anxiety in my chest, and SONY is so young and the young Nikon ahead ...
I've been waiting a similar theme ... About 20 / 30d triturated now here ...

09.08.2006 14:24:00

in place stabilizer.

Bullshit. Stabilized glass Nikon has not been canceled. At least Nikon battery grip is. 11 AF points with more than the Sony, pokytiem - really demanded thing when shooting dynamics.



I say - a provocation. But we've got somewhere pofludit.


09.08.2006 14:26:00

Stabilized glass Nikon has not been canceled.
for kilobaksov?

11 AF points with more than the Sony, pokytiem - really demanded thing when shooting dynamics.
not know. I have more than one - central - never used

09.08.2006 14:27:00
quote:
:

But Sony has one distinct advantage - the stabilizer. . .

not one and a half - from Nikon glass stabilized.

and Nikon, so expensive for Sony again behind
http: // onlinetrade. ru / cash / info / 31961. html? N8jMlh0 = r ... 5eXkSxb4Y6ArXtvoT
and our (also stabilized, however) is in the same online $ 550
http: // onlinetrade. ru / cash / info / 33995. html

09.08.2006 14:27:00


I except for extremely rare than good.

09.08.2006 14:28:00
I think I shall live in this thread.



Pro 20 / 30d triturated

This was to compare the incomparable (the ass with a finger), well in this thread Sony A-100 is not so much merges Nikon D80.

09.08.2006 14:28:00
If you look from the perspective of a simple amateur, selects the first SLR, someone will bite on universal kit lens Nikon, and someone on the stabilizer and anti-dust Sony. . .
those already podsazhen on the system much easier. . .

09.08.2006 14:30:00
People absolutely ceased to monitor their physical form. Or is there some starpёry and dystrophic gathered that everything is on the stabilizer pray?

09.08.2006 14:30:00

18-200 VR - 700, 24-120 - 500 ... Do not remind me, how many there 16-80 promise to roll out?
itself carcass A100 - well, frankly weak. With the D70 / 80 compare at all funny. With the D50 - still here and there ...

09.08.2006 14:30:00

yes no provocation, and meal choices. . .

09.08.2006 14:30:00

Nikon, so expensive for Sony again behind

optical quality compared to. The mere fact that Sonia aka Tamron on polstopa darker on the long end.

09.08.2006 14:32:00
quote:
:

itself carcass A100 - well, frankly weak. With the D70 / 80 compare at all funny. With the D50 - still here and there ...
Well, why frankly weak?
+/- IMHO

09.08.2006 14:35:00
Nikon's viewfinder and focusing system is clearly a plus. . . with regard. . . Well, do not talk about outsiders

09.08.2006 14:36:00
I think Nikon is more confident for the most part due to the greater number of previous owners cameras (compared to the number minoltistov)

much sense to compare the functional
Although no antishake, automatic start focusing when looking through the viewfinder display with anti-reflective coating - it speaks in favor of Sony. . Remind them at the Nikon-confirmation and manual focus is?
Well, Sony is a big plus is that it is already being sold in full

in favor of Nikon-a said greater range bracketing and better viewfinder (though increasing numbers say little about what you need to compare the live, since the viewfinder with high magnification can be darker, or have worse focusing screen that will make it less attractive as a whole)

But in general it is important to wait for the first test shots with the D80, to compare the really serious. . Since the full functionality of cameras does not mean anything if the image quality is worse. .

09.08.2006 14:36:00

Well, we construct the question differently. Than the functional A100 better than D50?
 

09.08.2006 14:37:00

Sony has not only sold, but has been around for less than the price announced by Nikon. . .

quote:
:

Well, we construct the question differently. Than the functional A100 better than D50?
Yes, even the notorious megapixels and no less notorious stabilizer. . .

09.08.2006 14:39:00

Sony has not only sold, but has been around for less than the price announced by Nikon. . .

well, Sony announced a couple of months ago, too, at prices higher. . So Nikon will probably fall in price

09.08.2006 14:40:00
quote:
:

Well, we construct the question differently. Than the functional A100 better than D50?

stabilizer
HSS Nikon have added or not?
Well, like a series of long - something there for dpreview nameryanno.

In fact, we must always take into account the price - much more expensive Nikon.

09.08.2006 14:40:00
Only the rich can afford to buy cheap things

09.08.2006 14:41:00

People absolutely ceased to monitor their physical form. Or is there some starpёry and dystrophic gathered that everything is on the stabilizer pray?

And what side here, "physical fitness"?

09.08.2006 14:41:00

Sony has not only sold, but has been around for less than the price announced by Nikon. . . - anecdote:
70s. Question from VOA Armenian Radio:
- How much do you receive on average engineer? After a long silence
Armenian radio responds:
- And you but blacks lynched!

09.08.2006 14:43:00
quote:
:
Only the rich can afford to buy cheap things

This motto owners D50?

09.08.2006 14:43:00
Well I do not know, I shoot without a stub with no problems, others complain about here, they say without bad. . .
What else a man can influence the outcome?

09.08.2006 14:44:00

HSS Nikon have added or not? in D80 - like yes. But
functional for me - not only the speed and Mn. 350D and faster, and megapixel than 10D. However, the last hand is pleasant to take. Unlike ...

09.08.2006 14:45:00

And what side here, "physical fitness"?
solid hands = free stub


Well, like a series of long
6RAW buffer 3 / sec so it would seem.

ran for popcorn people missed in the war. . .

09.08.2006 14:46:00

Well, we construct the question differently. Than the functional A100 better than D50?

not including megapixel and stabilizer

out:
have antidast
eats Compact Flash
have a white balance adjustment for degrees Kelvin
2. 5-inch screen and significantly higher quality at all
viewfinder better
9 focus points
start automatically when the focus look through the viewfinder focus confirmation
with manual focus depth of field preview


all pretty serious advantages, in my opinion

09.08.2006 14:47:00
confirmation of focus there and D50.
CF - an advantage? What?

09.08.2006 14:48:00

And what is your camera and glass?

09.08.2006 14:50:00

preview depth of field
somebody enjoys it here? !

2. 5-inch screen and significantly higher quality at all
and battery eating infection

eats Compact Flash
SD cheaper though I for CF two hands

09.08.2006 14:51:00

CF - an advantage? What?

well, if a person bought a few CF cards on 1-2Gb, this is clearly an advantage))
and then they just cheaper per megabyte (and faster on average)

09.08.2006 14:51:00

18-200 VR - 700, 24-120 - 500 ... Do not remind me, how many there 16-80 promise to roll out?
itself carcass A100 - well, frankly weak. With the D70 / 80 compare at all funny. With the D50 - still here and there ...


18-200 VR 700 in Russia. By the way if I had stayed Nikon marketers with brains in the whale for $ 1,200 he would have been, not 18-125. overall impression of the D80 - Nikon again wants two hundred bucks for a second wheel and LED backlit. On the A100 really funny to compare.

09.08.2006 14:52:00

And how much "2. 5 inch" more than 2. 5-inch (D80) or "9 focus points" more than 11-area AF system?
"there antidast" - this is just ridiculous

09.08.2006 14:55:00


It's about comparison with D50

09.08.2006 14:55:00
quote:
:

And what is your camera and glass?
Minolta Dynax 7; Dynax 7xi
Minolta AF 16/2. 8 FishEye, 28/2, 35/2, 50/2. 8 macro, 50/3. 5 macro 85/1. 4, 28-105 / 3. 5-4. 5xi, 100-300 / 4. 5-5. 6 APO,
Sigma EX 105/2. 8 DG macro, 17-35 / 2. 8-4, 24-70 / 2. 8 DF

09.08.2006 14:56:00

solid hands = free stub

Interesting logic. A "hard hand + stub almost free" - is nothing like?

Does not understand why Stabu constantly oppose it, "tripod", the "hard hand"? Here at me and shaking hands, and stand there, and stabilizer. And how would one another not even interfere.



Well I do not know, I shoot without a stub with no problems, others complain about here, they say without bad. . .

Ok, show acceptable photo from hand to 400-500 mm EGF delayed 1 / 10-1 / 13.

09.08.2006 14:56:00
if a person already has a card, it is the lack of human, not the camera. Buy the one with CF.
SD - do not break off contacts, talk about the speed is not necessary, the camera writes slower than we would like. About
cost:
http: // www. ultracomp. ru / common / good_ex. php? site_id = 1 ... ll = 1 & amp; id = 66210
http: // www. ultracomp. ru / common / good_ex. php? site_id = 1 ... ll = 1 & amp; id = 75749
SD cheaper
Well, about the size we can say, especially if a lot of cards

quote:
:

Well I do not know, I shoot without a stub with no problems, others complain about here, say no it is bad. . .

Ok, show acceptable photo from hand to 400-500 mm EGF delayed 1 / 10-1 / 13.

Do you personally have this?

09.08.2006 14:56:00

And how much "2. 5 inch" more than 2. 5-inch (D80) or "9 focus points" more than 11-area AF system?

question was about D50, the answer was about D50
regard D80, then
his small screen without glare and to twist in the hands of the camera have spoken about it negatively
9 or 11 focus points - the difference is really tiny
unlike comparison 9/11 points and 5 points - where the difference can be noticeable

09.08.2006 14:56:00
Everything started ... Soon will move 450 (or whatever) color metering zone in Nikon ... as well as auto-rotation disk imaging on the screen at the A100 ...
 

09.08.2006 15:01:00
quote:
:
1. 2. 5-inch screen and significantly higher quality at all
and battery eating infection

2. eats Compact Flash
SD cheaper though I for CF two hands

1. No, it cuts off automatic
2. False, CF cheaper but reliable SD

Nikon D80 vs. Sony Alpha A-100: pure pragmatism or compare without fanaticism

info@www.about-digital-photo.com