Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ1. Revolutionary megazum!

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

15.02.2006 21:55:00




lens Leica DC VARIO-ELMARIT

graphics processor Venus Engine III

Optical stabilization

ISO 800 (High Sensitivity)

VGA video 640 x 480 pixels and 840 x 480 at 30 / s.


2. 5-inch LCD screen 207 000 pixels.


 

15.02.2006 22:06:00
http: // panasonic. co. jp / pavc / global / lumix / tz1 / index. html

Here is a page on the official website

CD with a super zoom is interesting question is what happened, we will wait for test

15.02.2006 22:10:00
price?

15.02.2006 22:12:00


on the international website of Panasonic introductory price $ 350.

15.02.2006 22:21:00
http: // www. dpreview. com / news / 0602 / 06021405panasonictz1. asp

The TZ1 will be available in March with an MSRP of US $ 349. 95.

UPS. . . . . How do we respond together at the same time. .


15.02.2006 22:30:00
http: // www. ixbt. com / news / hard / index. shtml? 05/56/58
if I understood correctly - there is no priority mode, and so on. N.

15.02.2006 22:47:00


Spot is, DIMAR will be pleased. In general, in these cells priority mode nafig not needed - exposure compensation, manual ISO and WB quite enough.

Interestingly, before the show, you see, there is something more willing.

15.02.2006 22:59:00

Focal length (35mm equiv.): 35mm - 350mm
where is the wide angle? Is it possible to find a wide-angle converter lens for this

15.02.2006 23:07:00


nedotyagivaet malyas; )

15.02.2006 23:12:00
(sadly looks at his Sigma 70-300...)
This lens design we have been through with Minolta. I remember nothing revolutionary, it did not give. On the contrary - the quality was not so hot.

15.02.2006 23:15:00


Thanks for the link

2ALL

way samples! ! !

_http: // panasonic. co. jp / pavc / global / lumix / popup / gallery / models / tz1 / P1000048. JPG
_http: // panasonic. co. jp / pavc / global / lumix / popup / gallery / models / tz1 / P1000385. JPG
_http: // panasonic. co. jp / pavc / global / lumix / popup / gallery / models / tz1 / P1000158. JPG
_http: // panasonic. co. jp / pavc / global / lumix / popup / gallery / models / tz1 / P1000015. JPG

15.02.2006 23:17:00

What's revolutionary? Similar to the Nikon 4800 is only possible with ISO Stabia and more.

15.02.2006 23:25:00


example 10x optical zoom with the ability to 12. 5x the resolution of 3Mega. + Stabilizer course and shooting 250 shots on a single charge.

16.02.2006 0:55:00
and background blur, he can? and why he was deprived of the optical viewfinder

16.02.2006 7:41:00

a revolution hde?


If you know something antishake as stabilization system gives better results than the stabilization lenses. . .
If you do not know - read something informative.
camera only interested in price. and 10-fold zoom for fans of this fuck. . .
And it ISO800, okromya marketing is nothing. . .
you can shoot at ISO80, although there will be noise, like all Panasov. . .


16.02.2006 8:28:00

why there is only 8007 and ISO 1600 available. . .

16.02.2006 9:26:00

But this is not the first CD with ISO1600

16.02.2006 9:28:00

and background blur, he can?
et unlikely. matrix then, I suppose, tiddly. . .

16.02.2006 9:44:00

If you know something antishake as stabilization system gives better results than the stabilization lenses. . .
Where such infa?

16.02.2006 9:55:00
quote:
:
If you know something antishake as stabilization system gives better results than the stabilization lenses. . .

Nonsense. . . Depends on the final implementation, and the availability of the "right" additional intermediate lenses, and no clear patterns that better.

PS. Well, where I read about it? I'm interested in the real tests and Facts "luchshest" solutions to the stabilization of the matrix is, not the lens. . . Something I have never seen this, just marketing nonsense and performances of the producers themselves, that it is better, if not worse. . .

16.02.2006 10:31:00


teach Physics. . .

16.02.2006 10:35:00
quote:
:


teach Physics. . .

Well, one more "marketing". . .

PS: what have physics, if the result is the same in the final product? In this case, the end result of interest, rather than talking about "shnurkovschinu." . .

16.02.2006 10:38:00


Looks like Nikon 4800

I understand the cause for example Fujifilm FinePix Z2 or Sony DSC-T. . . series, but where does the Nikon 4800? ? ?


. . . antishake as stabilization system gives better results than the stabilization lenses. . .

And you guys (Canon, Nikon), DO NOT KNOW. . . (a)


But seriously, then there was some kind of canoe with heating matrix (stabilized). Did not understand.
Yes, and Minolta which is not all right with the photo business. . .
With that camera with this system win the title of the model year. . .
WMS will bring it (the system) to the mind, and then there will be grace. . .


16.02.2006 11:05:00
quote:
:


example 10x optical zoom with the ability to 12. 5x the resolution of 3Mega.
Yeah, and if later on the computer to make a crop of 640x480, the 40s will do! Indeed, long live the revolution!

16.02.2006 11:16:00



may call a single CD with 10x?
 

16.02.2006 11:23:00

If you know something antishake as stabilization system gives better results than the stabilization lenses. . .
If you do not know - read something informative.

pleasure. Have a reference?
teach Physics. . .
Now, if taught, may have believed. . . Well, as taught - I think that is nonsense. . .


may call a single CD with 10x?
And Olympus 760, 765, 770 is not a ride?


16.02.2006 11:53:00


Olympus almost 2 times as thick as the compactness is already here.

16.02.2006 12:01:00

actually compacts called here everything that does not mirror
And so. . . 112h58h40? Well, if a Pentax body thickness of 27mm 5x sticks, I think, nothing special that Panasonic stuck in 40mm 10X, especially since he has such-like off more and lens sticks out a little bit. . .

16.02.2006 12:04:00

Olympus almost 2 times as thick as the compactness is already here.
Oh. . . just did in two. . .
Olympus
Dimensions: 104, 5 mm (W) x 60 mm (H) x 68, 5 (T) mm
Weight: 280 g Panasonic
:
Dimensions: 112, 0h58, 1h2h40 2 mm
Weight: 234 g
No, well, of course Olympus thicker but not 2 times, and slightly smaller in length. However, I would have still called compact. . . 68. A 5 - is on the lens - where it increases the thickness of the well, and by the design of the Panasonic - yes, hiding. . .

PS This is so, in fairness. Well I myself like Panasonic. . . I FZ5

16.02.2006 12:07:00


The idea was that the cameras of this size and no zoom. Agree that between 5x and 10x is some difference

16.02.2006 12:10:00

especially since it seems-like off more and lens sticks out a little bit. . .
it sticks out at the level of the handle, which is held over, and 40mm, as I understand it, just the exposed portion

16.02.2006 12:18:00
See macro made in separate treatment on the wheel as my FZ-5 . E. To combine manual shutter speed and aperture and macro mode again nelya . A.. . . so he do not have the manual modes . But still interesting device. I wonder how they are such a scheme wide angle (35 mm equivalent, 5. 2 mm in real life!!) Managed to implement it?

16.02.2006 12:19:00
quote:
:

If you know something antishake as stabilization system gives better results than the stabilization lenses. . .
If you do not know - read something informative.

pleasure. Have a reference?
teach Physics. . .
Now, if taught, may have believed. . . Well, as taught - I think that is nonsense. . .
Apparently he was referring to the result in terms of image quality. But from the point of view of pretotvrascheniya blurring stabilization lens, such as preferred.


wide angle (35 mm equivalent, 5. 2 mm in real life!!) Managed to implement it?
Since when is considered 35mm wide angle?


16.02.2006 12:26:00

If you know something antishake as stabilization system gives better results than the stabilization lenses. . .
How many stops are guaranteed to give antishake?

16.02.2006 12:34:00

Since when is considered 35mm wide angle? can stop the flood? "Wide" = "short end" = "Wide"

16.02.2006 12:38:00

Apparently he was referring to the result in terms of image quality.
Well, in terms of picture quality - the best on the shutter speed and without stabilizer. It is a pity that this is not always possible.
But from the point of view of pretotvrascheniya blurring stabilization lens, such as preferred.
Here. . . I just always thought that the optical stabilizer just for this

And what is silent. No links, no arguments, but the bare words. . .

16.02.2006 12:41:00

And you guys (Canon, Nikon), DO NOT KNOW. . .
they have no development, no patents, since the company had never been fotoinzhenernymi in the truest sense of the word
. . .
here therefore also go the other way. . .
you would learn some history fotokompany. . .
http: // photoweb. ru / shorthistory. htm

who and what came up. . . and then laugh. . .


about antishake?
system shift matrix giroustroystvah effective system stabilized lenses for better picture quality?
I even do not want to look, know about it long ago. . .
why prove the obvious?
you need it?


16.02.2006 12:45:00

about antishake?
system shift matrix giroustroystvah effective system stabilized lenses?
you need it?

yeah. That's why I do not believe something and everything! .
And that can convince - throw in FIGS your Panas and take some realties Minolta. . . .

16.02.2006 12:45:00
But endorsing the screen at maximum focal length IMHO it is not convenient to take. Eh quality electronic viewfinder would so completely sweetie would.

16.02.2006 12:48:00

corrected the post. . .
so if you need to - I will find and accomplish your goal. . . Do not
Panas DSLRs, and compact and prosumer antishake interesting than optical stabilization in terms of the final result. A sense of something in general, is one.

16.02.2006 12:52:00

you would learn some history fotokompany. . .
http: // photoweb. ru / shorthistory. htm


Well, in some places there about stabilization. . .

can give a direct link. . . whether or not such?

16.02.2006 12:56:00
if I were opnichesky viewfinder -hotel would such a toy - and there have curtains or cover needed?

16.02.2006 12:59:00


Apparently cover as a model LX1.

16.02.2006 13:01:00

why prove the obvious?
Well, I'm not obvious. . . And not only me.
so if you need to - I will find and accomplish your goal. . .
not refuse. But it is desirable in Russian. English I do not know enough to understand all the subtleties

and on compact and prosumer antishake interesting than optical stabilization in terms of the final result.
Well really difficult to add a few words? Such as "interesting, because..."
Or "... The end result, which is expressed in the fact of in such and such conditions"
And somehow all around, and around. . .
Maybe I would not ask for references if you are in your own words arguments given to understand that you mean. Maybe, when I said that taught physics to explain your words wrong partition tried to apply

16.02.2006 13:09:00

Until the end is not yet finished reading, but the phrase teach Physics. . . - plunged into hysterical laughter
Open any textbook on physics, not sure that the school curriculum, but the initial uni courses and read, but forgot to write - choose a couple of problems (now is the time that reshebnik almost everything, so even strain will not have - in fact only solutions will be examined ))))), it was then already and write. . .
And for fun - list of mirrors in which the image stabilization occurs via lenses and one with the matrix

16.02.2006 13:20:00

teach Physics. . .
Maybe you and me to learn? And in this matter physicotechnical education is clearly not enough . Waiting for an answer academics!

16.02.2006 15:23:00

And for fun - list of mirrors in which the image stabilization occurs via lenses and one with the matrix
the point?
Nikon, Canon - lenses
KM - matrix (think Sony will maintain continuity), and Pentax have to catch up soon.
And so what?

16.02.2006 15:44:00

must - it does not mean that tighten and give a reference to - is that "must". . . Or so, with a lantern? ? ?
KM - already rests. And Sony has officially not anansirovala whether it will deal with DSLRs

And so what?
And with that development in this direction is not - and those who develop this area - are dead, or rather croaked
 

16.02.2006 15:54:00

Patents KM have not disappeared, she owns it and can sell licenses,
if it deems it necessary. CM left the photo business, and not out of business altogether.


Pentax have 30 patents antishake, including there are 20-year-old, as well as patents for motors in the lenses and stabilized optics, only the implementation has not happened. A living area.
you are ill-informed.

Some aggressive you - "dead", inspired by East Germany. .

a reference -
pliz - straight from the tin. . .
http: // www. pentax. ru / press / articlehtml / pr_optio_a10
http: // www. pentax. ru / press / articlehtml / pr_antishake


An old wish - An old will. .

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ1. Revolutionary megazum!

info@www.about-digital-photo.com