Put the dough fotoaparata Canon A410

Pages: 1

07.02.2006 12:56:00
Finally, I put on public display and review test digital camera Canon A410. Please all comments, suggestions and comments to write here.
Since this is my first review - please do not strongly criticize.
Link to review:
http: // dmitry2010. jino-net. ru
 

07.02.2006 13:22:00
quote:
Smart Media card at 16MB,
error.
quote:
bit strange that the bundle includes a memory card Multi Media Card (MMC), and not the Secure Digital (SD).
Which in this case is the difference?

quote:
In the photo you can see that even the outbreak of the foreground are not worked very well, and about the background and not say anything.
flash can illuminate the objects are the same from it at different distances against the physicists do not trample, illumination decreases inversely proportional to the square of the distance.

07.02.2006 13:27:00

the photos when artificial lighting.
1. The feeling that the manual WB made correctly.
2. It would be worthwhile to check when photographing presets BB (Tungsten, Fluorescent, Fluorescent H...)
usually most users still prefer presets, rather than hand-metering BB

it seems to me, we should not be linked to the Photoshop as
1. it is still a test chamber and not further processed
2. Photoshop - a program very expensive (and recommend it to piracy of not good)

07.02.2006 13:35:00
1. The feeling that the manual WB made correctly.
2. It would be worthwhile to check when photographing presets BB (Tungsten, Fluorescent, Fluorescent H...)

And by the way there is unclear, meant it manually or setting preset WB.

07.02.2006 14:01:00


White Balance was set to "Bulb", t. E. Used preset.

quote:

Smart Media card at 16MB,


error.


fix.

A recommendation regarding the use of Photoshop for photo correction - can be removed, if this is critical. . .

quote:

bit strange that the bundle includes a memory card Multi Media Card (MMC), and not the Secure Digital (SD).


Which in this case is the difference?


For some reason I thought that MMC - older format. Also, I can fix it.

07.02.2006 14:14:00

flash can illuminate the objects are the same from it at different distances against the physicists do not trample, illumination decreases inversely proportional to the square of the distance.

And to me so it seems that the entry-level tsifromylnits Canan, such work pyhi - norm. Like, this feature. It is not worked out the background m it is quite possible to overexposure of foreground objects. On the cameras of some other companies is almost does not happen, especially if the background is not very far away, as in the reduced in the test photos.

07.02.2006 14:30:00
quote:
:


White Balance was set to "Bulb", t. E. Used preset.
And where shooting was mixed lighting "Chandelier + flash"?

Generally a proprietary feature Canon - Yellow.

Personally, I've never used presets even when shooting without cameras and RAW-
quote:
A recommendation regarding the use of Photoshop for photo correction - can be removed, if this is critical. . .
uncritically.
quote:
bit strange that the bundle includes a memory card Multi Media Card (MMC), and not the Secure Digital (SD).

Which in this case is the difference?


For some reason I thought that MMC - older format. Also, I can fix it.
obsolete, although still used, and producing, but in this case (16MB-I test card), it does not matter.

quote:
:

flash can illuminate the objects are the same from it at different distances against the physicists do not trample, illumination decreases inversely proportional to the square of the distance.

And to me so it seems that the entry-level tsifromylnits Canan, such work pyhi - norm. Like, this feature. ; ) It is not worked out the background m it is quite possible to overexposure of foreground objects.
This automation problems, not flash. . . . .

07.02.2006 15:08:00

And where shooting was mixed lighting "Chandelier + flash"?

There's definitely a BB stood on the machine.


way, corrected some "schools" in the review.

07.02.2006 15:40:00
still camera with you?
try different presets for WB.
Even pictures do not always - when you switch presets on the screen immediately change the picture and can immediately assess what preset a better choice. In any case, as happened in the A95 / A610 / A620.

It would be nice to try and manual mode exhibiting BB.

What I dug up the BB - use in artificial lighting is very common, and what I see on your pictures - it seems to me unsatisfactory.

PS. During the test thanks, before I do believe that the cheapest model from Canon - A510 is. ; o)

07.02.2006 15:58:00


camera I will have until Saturday. Then go away as a gift, as was intended. . .
As for sorting presets - at minimum zoom - everything is fine, no problems with white balance under most lighting conditions. But it is necessary to set the zoom to the maximum, then the lack of light the camera starts to make mistakes in the big blind.

07.02.2006 16:19:00

before I even thought that the cheapest model from Canon - A510 is
The cheapest of those that you can buy in stores this new A400, the truth is far from everywhere. . . .

07.02.2006 18:25:00

This automation problems, not flash. . . . .
That's it, can not handle the unit when shooting with pyhoy and hands here will not help already.

07.02.2006 18:27:00

saw a portrait shot on A410 in natural light (cloudy day) - BB accurate, pleasant, soft colors are (as far as possible to assess for small screen).
It would be interesting to see an example of a portrait in natural light (eg., By the window).

08.02.2006 8:50:00


It would be interesting to see an example of a portrait in natural light (eg., By the window).

No problem, on Thursday, or tyapnitsu do. In an extreme case, on Saturday.

08.02.2006 9:36:00

Type I, this, in ryussky byukf not strong, but some obvious blunders can be seen immediately.

More recently, Canon has released a new, 3, 2-megapixel camera on the entry-level PowerShot A410.
Why comma after the word "new"?

Unlike its predecessor PowerShot A400 PowerShot A410 camera has a modern design and is equipped with a processor, DIGIC II, improves the speed and performance of the camera and lens with 3, 2 x optical zoom and a maximum aperture of f / 2. 8 - f / 5. 1. In this case, the camera body has become more compact and durable.
Zhuzhas. . .
a) at this time comma omitted. Exactly after the "PowerShot A400" ;
b) "Camera PowerShot A410" --- in the preceding sentence has already been said, there sho tse. I'm not stupid, I do not need to remind every sentence, that it was a "camera PowerShot A410";
c) "the camera has a more modern examination" --- here I'm not sure, but do not have a design imho. With a design that makes something else;
g) "improves the speed and performance" --- interesting turn , I was intrigued by the most chests.

Well hereinafter.

PS Please do not greatly offended, just briskly getting tired of these "reviews". On the content seems to be all right, but we have to work on the language.

08.02.2006 9:45:00

On the content seems to be all right, but we have to work on the language.
Well, difficult and at the same time thoroughly understand the technical side of the issue, and the literary. In every article needs a good literary editor, but you must admit, this is another level. A review entry-level cameras are not so many, especially more or less decent, so the author deserves, at least, commendable.

08.02.2006 10:02:00


Yeah, I do not deny that the text in the semantic and grammatical (and maybe even spelling) plan can be mistakes. But I no longer have the strength to change them. A little later I will try once again to re-read everything carefully and correct their own mistakes. But this review is not done for commercial gain, but just for the information of the people.

But the phrase "camera has a more modern examination" I'm at in the text is not found. . . Where did you find?

08.02.2006 10:06:00

finally put on public display and review test digital camera Canon A410. Please all comments, suggestions and comments to write here

Super found the same place where, well done. . .


A review entry-level cameras are not so many, especially more or less decent, so the author deserves, at least, commendable.
key point. . . often asked about this camera is level (up to 5000r with a memory card and, God forbid, with the batteries...) And when they say that the alternative is foggy start Rovers, rivers, practice lower price range, and so on. d.. .
 

08.02.2006 10:08:00

quote:
in a beautiful box with a camera have been found: 2 alkaline batteries
"Alkaline" more harmonious.

But this review is not done for commercial gain, but just for the information of the people.
Maybe for the benefit of start writing ever, the experience will not be superfluous.

08.02.2006 10:11:00

yes, forgot to say, much more interested in the capacity memory cards t. E. The degree of compression of pictures and a few words about what the video functions are limited, what resolution. . . although without this is already quite competent review turned

08.02.2006 10:42:00

But the phrase "the camera has a more modern examination" I'm at in the text is not found. . . Where did you find?
LOL course "camera has a more modern design." Ogovrochka fucking Freud morning native Forum MMF NSU walked a little. I read what is there about writing session LOL

08.02.2006 10:58:00
quote:
:

This automation problems, not flash. . . . .
That's it, can not handle the unit when shooting with pyhoy and hands here will not help already. : Down:
hands just possible, provided that the device will allow to put everything manually (including power blaze).


Yeah, I do not deny that the text in the semantic and grammatical (and maybe even spelling) plan can be mistakes. But I no longer have the strength to change them.
Spell checker in Word is very helpful, by the way, I recently even your e-soaps began to check.


08.02.2006 11:06:00


hands just possible, provided that the device will allow to put everything manually (including power blaze).

This device allows you to enter just the light intensity adjustment .

08.02.2006 11:51:00

hands just possible, provided that the device will allow to put everything manually (including power blaze).
And, let me ask? Increase the capacity to a maximum pyhi - guaranteed overexposure near objects let overexposure - the background is still not developed. Pro mode pyhi long exposure will not speak, it is suitable for extremely small number of subjects, even if this cell is such a regime. No, I still had the persistent view that the Canons A series of flash is a little too much "point."

08.02.2006 12:30:00

in Canons A series of flash is a little too much "point." disease all shoot cameras.

08.02.2006 12:51:00

what can I say, get a decent shot on this camera is not realistic. . .
I would not recommend it to buy ever.

08.02.2006 13:33:00


what can I say, get a decent shot on this camera is not realistic. . .

well for you, or for me - yes. But for many of the quality of the photos that this camera provides enough "for the eyes."
Most people, unfortunately, do not want to shoot, and "take a picture". And at the level of "point - Press - I removed." I tried to explain to his girlfriend: what shutter speed, aperture, the best way to build the track frame, metering methods. . . and so on. It was enough for 3 minutes, and then she said that she did not need to become a photographer, she does not want, and wants, unfortunately, only "take a picture".

08.02.2006 13:40:00

what can I say, get a decent shot on this camera is not realistic. . .
It is real, but the conditions for this survey should also be decent. On a sunny day in the street - all the beam.
Very often expensive devices differ from cheaper than the quality of images, and the range of possibilities.

in straitened financial circumstances or say as a gift to a child such a camera is still better than any Rovers, the rivers, the prime minister, and other shnyaga Genius. . . . .

08.02.2006 14:41:00

08.02.2006 15:02:00
quote:
:

disease all shoot cameras.
Nu-nu. . . ; )
http: // www. pbase. com / image / 54884381 - Canon PowerShot A610
http: // www. pbase. com / kmnorton / image / 37269386 - Olympus C-765 UZ
http: // www. pbase. com / kmnorton / image / 37269392 - Nikon D70
: gigi:
And what does that prove?

08.02.2006 15:16:00

agree, but. . .
I shot with this camera a year on a regular basis - it's a camera of my friends,
one soap. . . have hundreds of photos with this soap dish. . . otherwise he would not open his mouth and
print 10 * 15 more or less , but that's it - just for kids or in cramped fin. circumstances. . .

08.02.2006 15:48:00

And what does that prove?
What megazumah Olympus flash behaves more decently than some other brands of devices. . . I know it by its exactly correction hardly ever have to do, to work out on the built-in 100%.

08.02.2006 17:59:00

not only megazumah - all more or less, even the oldest. Perhaps except for the cheapest. In ultrazoom puff just very powerful.
 

17.11.2008 23:56:00
the machine is good, and at the expense shy Fin. circumstances - this way you are wrong. For example someone (me) do not care about the endless and sverhhedozhestvennost pixels, I use this bar of soap to documentary and office. . more than justified
Pages: 1

Put the dough fotoaparata Canon A410

info@www.about-digital-photo.com