Software for cataloging photos

Pages: 1

19.07.2001 10:36:00
It is interesting to conduct a poll here: Who uses what programs to catalog, organize your photos, and for what reasons, one or the other, the program has been selected? I think that this information will be of interest not only to me.

Thanks in advance, Alex.

 

23.07.2001 13:51:00
I tried a few, but the "perfect" for himself until he found. Although some of the requirements can be formulated. The main problem starts when getting a lot of pictures. And start them flushed CDR. And these disks become too much and look what is necessary becomes difficult. So the program cataloger should create its database of small images with links to the original image. So far, nothing found, and I want already. . .
friend Alex
ready to discuss: asskarp @ orc. ru

23.07.2001 14:48:00
Hmm. . . . . though this subject more than once rose. . . . . nevertheless it is possible to speak in this aspect.
//// what programs for cataloging uses /////
Went through a bunch of these programs, but stopped at ACDsee v3. 1.

//// for any reason, one or the other, the program has been selected ////
Yes, many! All transfer will not, and will point out the main ones.
1. Multi-friendly interface and the baby makes a fumble on disks and view files (as in preview mode), at least on behalf of the sort, delete, and so on. N.
2. There is a window of metadata by which to judge the shooting conditions ( shutter speed, aperture, sensitivity). . . Actually, that sometimes it is important to work with the photo archive.
3. Allows you to edit and quite a good built-in editor - there are the needs of the instruments. It allows you to work with different (a whole bunch) formats.
4. Allows you to send directly from it by E-mail photos and desired to anyone.
5. Allows you to make a text comment to each file, without killing the metadata, which is also important if you want comments. And the comment text is placed directly into the file.
6. Well, a very useful thing - it's context search text comments to the entire database of multiple files (one pressing F3). Search by date, by name. . . . . . by author.
7. Allows you very easy to print from it.
8. There are plug-ins to interact with different cameras (including Olympus, Kodak, Epson.....), But I do not use them, as well - someone may be helpful.
9. There are a lot of different types of utilities generate web pages with photos (preview + Comment + full view mode), there konvertilki,. . . . . . . . By this I do not use.

What I do not like:
1. is the need to complete the installation on another computer, if a nomadic life.
It can not just carry on the same drive where the pictures and run with it
2. No such tools as a histogram channels (RGB),. . . . . . even just browsing. Another such
convenient combination of at least 7 points, I have not seen.
therefore use it for the second year.



23.07.2001 23:36:00

ACDsee v3. 1. - and where it can be "for free" to copy, I understand that free cheese only in a mousetrap, and it is certainly. . .

24.07.2001 2:38:00
PhotoBase or Ulead Album or Adobe ActiveShare. Last frivarnaya. It is best not to swing with adobe and with CNET Download or ZDNET Software. And ficham best Ulead Album. Bob trial with www. ulead. com . Crack the known Slovak address. And just smotrelka ACDsee. While it is good.

24.07.2001 4:16:00
:
quote:
5. Allows you to make a text comment to each file, without killing the metadata, which is also important if you want comments. And the comment text is placed directly into the file.

Teach me how to do, so she kept in the file comments. I have it in your comments stores base. Crashed base - kapets comments. I took pictures to another machine - kapets comments. Well, the other, consequent inconvenience. Thanks in advance.


24.07.2001 5:08:00

offtopic
Mozhayev the address and Slovak chat on the soap?

24.07.2001 10:33:00
SSA
Here is a 30 day.
http: // www. acdsystems. com / index. htm
A full freebies, you can search for transitions.

McSimm
Indeed, the main comments she keeps in the database and only Discription field in the file, that sometimes is enough small notes and the subsequent search, even with the transfer.


24.07.2001 13:36:00
Tip-off - "the famous Slovak address" web page address is very evil hacker. He hangs out at the Flame.

24.07.2001 14:02:00
Terrible Jenka Generator:
A ACDsee just smotrelka. While it is good.

And that Ulead Album have that is not in the ACDSee 3. 1 Powerpack?
PS Just Album I have not seen, but at the moment I think ACDSee 3. 1 the best for this purpose. I would be grateful for any information.

By the way, if anyone knows where I can get plug-ins ACDSee 3. 1 for Olympus S860 and 3040 will oochen appreciated!


24.07.2001 14:15:00
Ktstati ACDSee for me the choice was due to one - to view the metadata captured in the pictures (shutter speed, aperture, sensitivity). I know that there are some gadgets that let you watch it, but it is separate from Viera. A
know the parameters for shooting the photographer is important. For many people this may not be necessary.

Luck @
ACDSee 3. At 1 there is a plugin for the D-600L (C1400L) to work with the COM port. It may well it will work with other Olimpusovskimi cameras, but the COM port (protocol did not seem to me, and cable assembly). On USB I never met.


25.07.2001 2:47:00
:
quote:
Indeed, the main comments she keeps in the database and only Discription field in the file, that sometimes is enough small notes and the subsequent search, even with the transfer.

A deskripshn how to file stuff? I have it stores them in a hidden file DESCRIPT. ION directory with photos.


25.07.2001 9:49:00
McSimm
//// And deskripshn how to file stuff? I have it stores them in a hidden file DESCRIPT. ION directory with photos. /////
and I guess it is the same stores. On this somehow did not pay attention to this.
Thank you suggested, now I'll know.


25.07.2001 11:07:00
ACDSee not able to save albums in separate files, the contents of which can be seen then, and very quickly. Of course, there is no features for editing, but for cataloging photos, especially when a lot of them, nothing better than Ulead Album no. By the way, Album integrates well with PhotoImpact, and is a professional editing.

25.07.2001 18:07:00
Thank you for the information!

PS Yes, I think Ulead Album worth seeing (though at Ulead. Com I have not found ().


26.07.2001 10:27:00
PS Yes, I think Ulead Album worth seeing (though at Ulead. Com I have not found ().

He now called Ulead Photo Explorer 7 Pro.


07.08.2006 22:40:00
have users PicaJet? Share a little key pliz. . .

====
who will advise what prog except ASDS?

07.08.2006 22:47:00
what topic surfaced. . .
apertura already yard

07.08.2006 22:58:00

about the aperture in the court did not understand. . is a program?

07.08.2006 23:29:00
Photo Station - a very worthy program with lots of features. About the free versions do not know. . .
 

07.08.2006 23:36:00
PicaJet FX. For the first time I bought a license truth, and costs only 190 rubles. While it is better not found. You can, of course, popridiratsya; but judging by the speed of the responses support, it is hoped that in the 3rd version will add whatever you want.

08.08.2006 0:15:00
fx-forum
you advise? or simply as an option. .


here I also liked the program, really now worth 190r? ? I can not believe medlennovataya true, but very comfortable.

08.08.2006 0:37:00
quote:
:
fx-forum
advise? or simply as an option. .
advise as an option)

Prog, however, very fancy. Professional photographing and cataloging the images in the media. So take your pick.

08.08.2006 13:46:00
Discussion has been here:
Organization Archives of digital photography

For more than 4 years use IMatch ( www. Photools. Com) . At the time, I tried all of the above, but stopped at IMatch.

08.08.2006 13:55:00

hmm. . . will the city look


saw and put it softinu seemed dull, terrible, uncomfortable and difficult, from what I've seen for a standard picajet fx, even iview mediapro look and this is what the above advised

08.08.2006 14:14:00

saw and put it softinu seemed dull, terrible, uncomfortable and difficult, from what I've seen for a standard picajet fx, even iview mediapro look and this is what the above advised
Interesting assessment criteria
there any specific the benefits of these prog before IMatch?

08.08.2006 15:58:00

uncomfortable, vague, ugly

detail was not looking, I would say if you run details

08.08.2006 16:23:00

uncomfortable, vague, ugly
very subjective. But I will not argue, everyone has their tastes and objectives.

IMatch one of the most powerful and customizable catalogers. Where else is there, for example, the ability to write their own scripts to perform custom actions on the catalog (and sooner or later there is such a need).

My opinion and a comparison with other prog IMatch have on this link.

08.08.2006 16:39:00
Half an hour later I look again. reference only to native women, there to see?

08.08.2006 17:17:00
I'm talking about the discussion at this forum:
Archives Organization of digital photos

08.08.2006 17:23:00

can not find where to download cFosSpeed. . . photo station


can not find where to download cFosSpeed. . . photo station


read the topic and realized that it is difficult to obtain bemplatno. . . but is expensive, or there vprianty


15.08.2006 9:58:00

iMatch looked like anything, it will be necessary to look in detail
iView mediapro 3 debility, and did not understand how to categorize + need to search for it when Sasa create categories of folders, where are the pictures


PhotoStation some zamorochennye similar iView I do not understand how to break into categories and not to copy pictures to another folder

15.08.2006 11:08:00
and no one did not use picassa? I've downloaded and installed - like a good idea, though details pokane understood.

17.08.2006 11:42:00
People, and how to cure the problem of display folders with Cyrillic? I kryakozyabi. . . .

08.09.2006 11:11:00
quote:
:

about the aperture in the court did not understand. . is a program?

Yeah.
Apple Aperture (OS X)
their competitors
Adobe LightRoom (OS X / Win) - IMHO adobovskaya carbon paper is much more inconvenient, but under Windows it is. . .

30.09.2006 19:09:00
In PicaJet has a useful function: record descriptions in XMP fields for DNG files. On site PicaJet has a small program called RoboImport.

get good automation when working with RAW files: RoboImport download RAW files from the camera, convert them to DNG, DNG registers in my comments and copyrights. Then run PicaJet, add descriptions, which are then written to the files.

30.07.2008 0:53:00
PicaJet supports Unicode?


just looking for a program to create comments in the metadata that would be read in most browsers.



ZoomBrowser refuses to keep the comments in Cyrillic or Latin Extended (Ä, & # 214
 

23.06.2012 16:17:00
Since it's already 2012, it will raise the topic

Please advise on such cataloger's parameters:

1. Tags, in Vol. H. Filter by date
2. Ability poznachat people (preferably outline in as VKontakte)
3. Ability to make notes to photos
4. Offline!
5. It is advisable to good engine to see the slideshow
6. A wide range of back-up functionality
7. Easy migration between systems

For good prog and do not mind to pay!
Pages: 1

Software for cataloging photos

info@www.about-digital-photo.com