Diskussion des Artikels: " Lens Review Fujinon XF 23mm F1, 4 R "

Seiten: 1

06.10.2016 13:17:00
I propose to discuss the objective review of Fujinon XF 23mm F1, 4 R
Haha do reviews on technology, which is already a couple of years?
 

06.10.2016 13:22:00

Haha do reviews on technology, which is already a couple of years?

To shirnarmass able to once again enjoy the works of photographer Alexandra Manovtseva. It is obvious!

06.10.2016 13:41:00
About the examples I say nothing at all. The first picture, & quot; anvil & quot ;, the dawn of F1. 4 ISO 6400, Nuqui? If we want to check out bokeshku, and here the landscape, as in terrible if we want the details, what for here 1. 4 and ISO 6400? I can not think how and what to show? Bokeshku should be removed in the same spirit, detalizitsiyu in another. There simply trash.

& quot; You have tried to take pictures of the pre-dawn early hour with a tripod? No? We do not recommend: lost a minute or two - and a very different light, not to mention the color. & Quot;
author - a technique to sell or hand (head) straightening. And what's with the photo quality, even at Fuji Cams. dzhpeg not so bad, especially with regard to the fixation F8 and ISO 200. This negative publicity right Fudge. I'd sue

p. s & quot; some & quot; and in truth the third message. . .

06.10.2016 18:47:00


quote:
& quot; You have tried to take pictures of the pre-dawn early hour with a tripod? No? We do not recommend: lost a minute or two - and a very different light, not to mention the color. & Quot;

had priperetsya earlier and with a tripod, as well - really strange occupation - f / 1. 4, ISO 6400

18.10.2016 2:38:00
quote:
:


quote:
& quot; You have tried to take pictures of the pre-dawn early hour with a tripod? No? We do not recommend: lost a minute or two - and a very different light, not to mention the color. & Quot;
had priperetsya earlier and with a tripod, as well - really strange occupation - f / 1. 4, ISO 6400

Do not you think that the tips in these terms - is ordinary rudeness?

18.10.2016 2:49:00


No of course - let's say in the year before the weekend I myself got up long before dawn, with a tripod and so forth.
ISO 100.

is the result obtained from the author [beep], our duty to honestly explain to all readers of the author's why the result is [beep].

18.10.2016 4:51:00

Mantsev somebody's daughter or what? For viewing level somewhere below the plinth: smirk:

18.10.2016 11:25:00
Regarding the system of Fuji and this lens, 23/1. 4 - that, for example, is now a full-frame Canon 6D in conjunction with 35/2 USM IS is cheaper than, for example, kropnutyh XT2 + 23/1. 4R.

do not understand. . .

18.10.2016 11:29:00

do not understand. . .

Canon - cheap shit, and Fuji - the choice of professionals (photographer Alexander Manovtseva warrants it) .
But best of all, judging by the price, Sony RX1RM2 .
 

18.10.2016 12:27:00
Well, some photos to illustrate articles need anyway, and to Alexander and photos for this format is quite appropriate. The text is easy to read, pictures look the same - what else is needed for PR?


Canon - cheap shit

Taki yes
Seiten: 1

Diskussion des Artikels: " Lens Review Fujinon XF 23mm F1, 4 R "

info@www.about-digital-photo.com